IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i1p215-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating Change: Assessing Organizational Agility in Higher Education Management, Examining the Implementation of Educational Processes, and Understanding Student Expectations for Program Characteristics and Principles

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Kwasek
  • Maria Kocot
  • Hubert Gasinski
  • Janusz Sobon

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to assess how organizational agility affects the management of universities, especially in the context of the implementation of teaching processes and students' expectations regarding the features and principles of educational programs. The article aims to explore how educational institutions can effectively adapt to rapidly changing educational, social, and economic conditions. Design/Methodology/Approach: A survey method was used. Between October and November 2023, a questionnaire was sent online to respondents. During the study, the standards of the CAWI technique were applied. The results of the surveys were prepared with the help of SPSS Statistic software. Findings: Higher education institutions that have implemented agile management practices showed a greater ability to adapt to new challenges like changing student needs, technological advancements, and labor market shifts. Agile practices in higher education positively impact the effectiveness of educational processes and meet student expectations. Practical Implications: Emphasizing the need for continuous evaluation and adjustment of teaching and management approaches in universities to meet students' expectations. Highlighting the importance of individualized agility principles tailored to each institution's unique environment and needs. Originality/Value: The article stands out by exploring the role of organizational agility in the context of the adaptive challenges faced by higher education institutions, highlighting its impact on the management dynamics and competitiveness of these institutions. This work brings new insights into how agility can contribute to better change management, innovation, and university efficiency, making important contributions to the educational management literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Hubert Gasinski & Janusz Sobon, 2024. "Navigating Change: Assessing Organizational Agility in Higher Education Management, Examining the Implementation of Educational Processes, and Understanding Student Expectations for Program Characteri," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 215-227.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:1:p:215-227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3357/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul C. Godfrey & Nile W. Hatch, 2007. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 87-98, January.
    2. Thanh Hung Pham & Thi Thanh Hang Hoang & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos & Hoang Anh Le, 2022. "The Impact of Quality of Public Administration on Local Economic Growth in Vietnam," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Zhen, Jie & Xie, Zongxiao & Dong, Kunxiang, 2021. "Impact of IT governance mechanisms on organizational agility and the role of top management support and IT ambidexterity," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    4. Hana Stverkova & Michal Pohludka, 2018. "Business Organisational Structures of Global Companies: Use of the Territorial Model to Ensure Long-Term Growth," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-9, June.
    5. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    6. Agota Giedre RAIŠIENE & , Svitlana BILAN & Vainius SMALSKYS & Jolita GECIENE, 2019. "Emerging Changes In Attitudes To Inter-Institutional Collaboration: The Case Of Organizations Providing Social Services In Communities," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 34-56, December.
    7. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    8. Russell Tatenda Munodawafa & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Damian Kocot & Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Joanna Rogozinska-Mitrut, 2024. "The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Agile Organization Management," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 118-130.
    2. Maria Kocot & Artur Kwasek & Grzegorz Mathea & Krzysztof Kandefer & Dariusz Soboń, 2024. "Students’ Expectations Regarding the Achievement of Educational Outcomes in Terms of Knowledge, Practical Skills, and Social Competencies as Determinants of Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Artur Kwasek & Damian Kocot & Izabela Gontarek & Jacek Oleksiejuk & Joanna Rogozinska-Mitrut & Malgorzata Golinska-Pieszynska, 2024. "Human Resource Management Practices in an Agile Organization in the Aspect of Own Research," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 383-399.
    4. Yanica P. Dimitrova, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation – the Meaningful Connection," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 89-108.
    5. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Qaiser Rafique Yasser & Abdullah Al Mamun & Irfan Ahmed, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 210-221, May.
    7. Meng‐Feng Yen & Yung‐Ming Shiu & Chi‐Feng Wang, 2019. "Socially responsible investment returns and news: Evidence from Asia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1565-1578, November.
    8. Mark Panton, 2012. "Football and Corporate Social Responsibility," Birkbeck Sports Business Centre Working Papers 5, Birkbeck College, Department of Management.
    9. Seungyeon Moon & Heesang Lee, 2021. "Shaping a Circular Economy in the Digital TV Industry: Focusing on Ecopreneurship through the Lens of Dynamic Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-41, April.
    10. Nazari, Mohsen, 2022. "The journey from Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Innovation: The Whys and the Hows," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 2(2), pages 27-39.
    11. Inoue, Yuhei & Lee, Seoki, 2011. "Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism-related industries," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 790-804.
    12. Carolyn Dunn & Michelle Eble, 2015. "Giving Voice to the Silenced: Using Critical Discourse Analysis to Inform Crisis Communication Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 717-735, December.
    13. Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Elva Alicia Ramos-Escobar, 2021. "Entrepreneurial orientation and CSR: a dynamic capability in the corporate performance of Mexican SMEs," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 654-680, March.
    14. Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Hubert Gasinski & Krzysztof Nowakowski, 2024. "The Role and Use of ICT in Agile Organizations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 568-582.
    15. Wang, Qi & Wu, Chong & Sun, Yang, 2015. "Evaluating corporate social responsibility of airlines using entropy weight and grey relation analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 55-62.
    16. Jinhwan Kim & Hyeob Kim & HyukJun Kwon, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Activity Combinations for Sustainability: A Fuzzy Set Analysis of Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Malgorzata Golinska - Pieszynska & Artur Fiks & Krzysztof Kandefer, 2024. "Attributes of the Agile University Education Program in the Conditions of Knowledge-Based Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 500-516.
    18. Claude Francoeur & Réal Labelle & Souha Balti & Saloua EL Bouzaidi, 2019. "To What Extent Do Gender Diverse Boards Enhance Corporate Social Performance?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 343-357, March.
    19. Habtie Alemnew Belay & Fentaye Kasaa Hailu & Gedif Tessema Sinshaw, 2024. "Linking employees' work orientation and corporate social responsibility practices: Multilevel and multistakeholder cross‐sectional study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 676-696, January.
    20. Lan Li & Gang Li & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Hsiu-Yu Lee & Chien-Hsing Lee, 2019. "The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Service Innovation Performance: The Role of Dynamic Capability for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agility; university; students; management; curriculum.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:1:p:215-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.