IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiy2018ispecial3p227-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brand Promise and Reputation Against the Campaign of a Political Party

Author

Listed:
  • Janfry Sihite
  • Sofjan Assauri
  • Rizal Edy Halim

Abstract

The term “exchange” represents the core concept of marketing. Exchange occurs not only in commercial markets but also in political markets, such as electoral and government markets. Political marketing research typically focuses on electoral markets; therefore, this research integrates exchanges in electoral and government markets, which together form the permanent campaign. This model proposes that the realization of a promise affects the party’s brand reputation and permanent campaign, ultimately influencing the voter’s decision confidence and intent to support the political party. The brand promise indicator was developed from an exploratory factor analysis of Indonesian political party Twitter accounts. Tweets extracted from the 2014 electoral campaign were further analyzed using Provalis Research’s QDA Miner software. The indicators for brand reputation, permanent campaign, decision confidence, and intent to support the political party were adapted from political marketing and commercial marketing indicators. A questionnaire was created and delivered to students of three universities in Jakarta, with a total of 150 participants. The findings show that the permanent campaign variable as the process of promise realization during the term after the election has a significant influence on the voter’s intent to support a political party. The theoretical contribution of this research includes broadening the empirical results of social exchange theory studies on exchange in the government market, beyond existing research on the electoral market. The managerial implication of this research is the importance of the permanent campaign in increasing the intent to vote for a political party.

Suggested Citation

  • Janfry Sihite & Sofjan Assauri & Rizal Edy Halim, 2018. "Brand Promise and Reputation Against the Campaign of a Political Party," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 227-240.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxi:y:2018:i:special3:p:227-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1398/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burmann, Christoph & Jost-Benz, Marc & Riley, Nicola, 2009. "Towards an identity-based brand equity model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 390-397, March.
    2. Bennett, Peter D & Harrell, Gilbert D, 1975. "The Role of Confidence in Understanding and Predicting Buyers' Attitudes and Purchase Intentions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(2), pages 110-117, Se.
    3. Anthony Downs, 1957. "An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(2), pages 135-135.
    4. Newman, Bruce I & Sheth, Jagdish N, 1985. "A Model of Primary Voter Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(2), pages 178-187, September.
    5. Young Mee Chung & Jae Yun Lee, 2001. "A corpus‐based approach to comparative evaluation of statistical term association measures," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(4), pages 283-296.
    6. Winchester, Tiffany M. & Hall, John & Binney, Wayne, 2014. "Young adult voting decision-making: Studying the effect of usage from a consumer behaviour perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 144-154.
    7. Laroche, Michel & Kim, Chankon & Zhou, Lianxi, 1996. "Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An empirical test in a multiple brand context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 115-120, October.
    8. He, Hongwei & Li, Yan & Harris, Lloyd, 2012. "Social identity perspective on brand loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 648-657.
    9. Miller, Arthur H. & Wattenberg, Martin P. & Malanchuk, Oksana, 1986. "Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 80(2), pages 521-540, June.
    10. Robert Stine, 1989. "An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 18(2-3), pages 243-291, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caiwei Ma & Norman Au & Lianping Ren, 2020. "Biased minds experience improved decision-making speed and confidence on social media: a heuristic approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 593-624, December.
    2. Hui-Hsin HUANG, 2014. "Explorative Study on the Concept of Mind Shares: Confidence, Resistance and Loyalty," Expert Journal of Marketing, Sprint Investify, vol. 2(1), pages 15-27.
    3. Caiwei Ma & Norman Au & Lianping Ren, 0. "Biased minds experience improved decision-making speed and confidence on social media: a heuristic approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-32.
    4. Han, Jie & Wang, Desheng & Yang, Zhihao, 2023. "Acting like an interpersonal relationship: Cobrand anthropomorphism increases product evaluation and purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Laroche, Michel & Takahashi, Ikuo & Kalamas, Maria & Teng, Lefa, 2005. "Modeling the selection of fast-food franchises among Japanese consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(8), pages 1121-1131, August.
    6. Andreas Schedler, 1998. "The Normative Force of Electoral Promises," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 10(2), pages 191-214, April.
    7. Teng, Lefa & Laroche, Michel, 2007. "Building and testing models of consumer purchase intention in competitive and multicultural environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 260-268, March.
    8. Winchester, Tiffany M. & Hall, John & Binney, Wayne, 2014. "Young adult voting decision-making: Studying the effect of usage from a consumer behaviour perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 144-154.
    9. Lunardo, Renaud & Guerinet, Richard, 2007. "The influence of label on wine consumption: its effects on young consumers' perception of authenticity and purchasing behavior," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7847, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Peter Grand & Guido Tiemann, 2013. "Projection effects and specification bias in spatial models of European Parliament elections," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(4), pages 497-521, December.
    11. M.L. Nores & M.P. Díaz, 2016. "Bootstrap hypothesis testing in generalized additive models for comparing curves of treatments in longitudinal studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 810-826, April.
    12. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    13. Kaivan Munshi & Mark Rosenzweig, 2008. "The Efficacy of Parochial Politics: Caste, Commitment, and Competence in Indian Local Governments," NBER Working Papers 14335, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Burkhard Schipper & Hee Yeul Woo, 2012. "Political Awareness and Microtargeting of Voters in Electoral Competition," Working Papers 124, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    15. Bastian Popp & Herbert Woratschek, 2017. "Consumer–brand identification revisited: An integrative framework of brand identification, customer satisfaction, and price image and their role for brand loyalty and word of mouth," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 250-270, May.
    16. Marco Faravelli & Randall Walsh, 2011. "Smooth Politicians And Paternalistic Voters: A Theory Of Large Elections," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000250, David K. Levine.
    17. Eric Kaufmann & Henry Patterson, 2006. "Intra‐Party Support for the Good Friday Agreement in the Ulster Unionist Party," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(3), pages 509-532, October.
    18. Micael Castanheira, 2003. "Why Vote For Losers?," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(5), pages 1207-1238, September.
    19. Mihir Bhattacharya, 2019. "Constitutionally consistent voting rules over single-peaked domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 225-246, February.
    20. Sven Banisch & Eckehard Olbrich, 2021. "An Argument Communication Model of Polarization and Ideological Alignment," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 24(1), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxi:y:2018:i:special3:p:227-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.