IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiy2018i4p493-501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Literature Review of Altruism: Challenges, Outcomes and Future Research Directions

Author

Listed:
  • A. Yuniawan
  • U. Udin
  • A. Abdurrahman
  • R. Puji Suci

Abstract

This study aims to provide a complete reference and guidance for future research on the topic of altruism by exploring its challenges, outcomes, and practices. The systematic literature review is applied to integrate the study in an organized, transparent and reproducible form. It is known that the construct of altruism has been defined to be better in the context of both organizational behavior and organizational development. Research findings referring to altruism concepts and theories have been published by several authors which provides a reference for the development of altruism concepts and theories in the context of marketing communication. For now, the study shows that altruism emerges as a management paradigm that is significant and has various outcomes and implications for individual and organizational contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Yuniawan & U. Udin & A. Abdurrahman & R. Puji Suci, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review of Altruism: Challenges, Outcomes and Future Research Directions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 493-501.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxi:y:2018:i:4:p:493-501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2018_XXI_4_39.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David K. Levine, 1998. "Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiment," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 1(3), pages 593-622, July.
    2. Bettman, James R & Luce, Mary Frances & Payne, John W, 1998. "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(3), pages 187-217, December.
    3. Dody Hapsoro & Tulus Suryanto, 2017. "Consequences of Going Concern Opinion for Financial Reports of Business Firms and Capital Markets with Auditor Reputation as a Moderation Variable - An Experimental Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2A), pages 197-223.
    4. Simon Grima & Sharon Seychell & Frank H. Bezzina, 2017. "Investigating Factors Predicting Derivative Mishandling: A Sociological Perspective," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 3-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Euis Soliha & Suzy Widyasari, 2018. "Message Framing and Source Credibility in Product Advertisements with High Consumer Involvement," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 413-422.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:493-501 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rina Yuliastuty Asmara and Rini Situanti, 2018. "The Effect of Audit Tenure and Firm Size on Financial Reporting Delays," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 115-126.
    3. Jacobs Martin, 2016. "Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 121-183, August.
    4. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:459-469 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Cooper, David J. & Stockman, Carol Kraker, 2002. "Fairness and learning: an experimental examination," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 26-45, October.
    6. Wier Ritonga, 2018. "How to Enhance Society\'s Income through Entrepreneurship, Information and Legislation Policy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 459-469.
    7. repec:ers:journl:v:vi:y:2018:i:3:p:115-126 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Agnes Bäker & Werner Güth & Kerstin Pull & Manfred Stadler, 2012. "On the Context-Dependency of Inequality Aversion - Experimental Evidence and a Stylized Model -," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-023, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    9. Maria Gabriella Graziano & Vincenzo Platino, 2024. "A measure of social loss for production economies with externalities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(2), pages 443-474, September.
    10. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Hyowon Kim & Dong Soo Kim & Greg M. Allenby, 2020. "Benefit Formation and Enhancement," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 419-468, December.
    12. Decker, Torsten & Stiehler, Andreas & Strobel, Martin, 2002. "A Comparison of Punishment Rules in Repeated Public Good Games - An Experimental Study," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    13. Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2019. "The many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1025-1069.
    14. Emin Karagözoğlu & Elif Tosun, 2022. "Endogenous Game Choice and Giving Behavior in Distribution Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-32, November.
    15. R. M. Harstad & R. Selten, 2014. "Bounded-rationality models:tasks to become intellectually competitive," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 5.
    16. Carpenter, Jeffrey P. & Bowles, Samuel & Gintis, Herbert, 2006. "Mutual Monitoring in Teams: Theory and Experimental Evidence on the Importance of Reciprocity," IZA Discussion Papers 2106, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Ghidoni, Riccardo & Suetens, Sigrid, 2019. "Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games," Other publications TiSEM ff3a441f-e196-4e45-ba59-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Ambrus, Attila & Pathak, Parag A., 2011. "Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 500-512.
    19. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. James Agarwal & Wayne DeSarbo & Naresh K. Malhotra & Vithala Rao, 2015. "An Interdisciplinary Review of Research in Conjoint Analysis: Recent Developments and Directions for Future Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(1), pages 19-40, March.
    21. John A. List, 2007. "On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(3), pages 482-493.
    22. Yoshifumi Hino & Yusuke Zennyo, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and strategic relationships," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 64(3), pages 231-244, September.
    23. Greenacre, Luke & Martin, James & Patrick, Sarah & Jaeger, Victoria, 2016. "Boundaries of the centrality effect during product choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 32-38.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxi:y:2018:i:4:p:493-501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.