IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial3p853-861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Networks in Emerging Work Models

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Andrzejak
  • Grzegorz Belz

Abstract

Purpose: The outbreak of the COVID-19 forced companies to transform from the on-site work model to the remote or hybrid ones. This paper analyzes threats and challenges resulting from changes in the network structures before and during the pandemic-driven emergence of new work models. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study compares the structure of the social networks in three different work models, (a) office work model before COVID-19, (b) remote work model after the outbreak of coronavirus, and (c) hybrid work model during some of the pandemic restrictions loosening. Research is based on series of experiments conducted in the frame of strategic business simulations. In our approach, the primary source of information where people with their knowledge, behaviors, and points of view. Findings: Our findings confirm the early stage of remote and hybrid work model proficiency among managers and shed light on emerging threats for organizational transformation and innovation capability in such distributed work models. Practical Implications: New work models need to be deeply verified and improved. In the reality of distributed work models, we believe that analyzing social networks will become a critical approach used in organizations to understand weak ties forming their innovation and transformation capabilities. Originality/Value: We used the opportunity of ongoing longitudinal research during which the COVID-19 outbreak occurred. We recorded and analyzed disruptive changes in the social networks of competing teams during pandemic-caused transformations. We found the importance and threats of fragile social ties for organizations operating under distributed work models for innovation and transformation capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Andrzejak & Grzegorz Belz, 2021. "Social Networks in Emerging Work Models," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 853-861.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:853-861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2527/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen P. Borgatti & Daniel S. Halgin, 2011. "On Network Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1168-1181, October.
    2. Erik Brynjolfsson & John J. Horton & Adam Ozimek & Daniel Rock & Garima Sharma & Hong-Yi TuYe, 2020. "COVID-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at US Data," NBER Working Papers 27344, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Daniel Z. Levin & Rob Cross, 2004. "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1477-1490, November.
    4. Martin Ruef, 2002. "Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 427-449, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gareth D. Leeves, 2014. "Increasing returns to education and the impact on social capital," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 449-470, October.
    2. Leif Brandes & Marc Brechot & Egon Franck, 2011. "The Temptation of Social Ties: When Interpersonal Network Transactions Hurt Firm Performance," Working Papers 00159, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU), revised 2012.
    3. Jordi Molas-Gallart & Pablo D’Este & Oscar Llopis & Ismael Rafols, 2016. "Towards an alternative framework for the evaluation of translational research initiatives," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 235-243.
    4. Díez-Vial, Isabel & Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles, 2016. "How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 41-52.
    5. Riccardo Crescenzi & Luisa Gagliardi & Marco Percoco, 2013. "Social Capital and the Innovative Performance of Italian Provinces," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(4), pages 908-929, April.
    6. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Nathan, Max & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2016. "Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 177-194.
    7. de Vaan, Mathijs, 2014. "Interfirm networks in periods of technological turbulence and stability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1666-1680.
    8. Céline Flipo & Pier Vittorio Mannucci & Kevyn Yong, 2023. "The impact of cultural tightness on the relationship between structural holes, tie strength, and creativity," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(2), pages 332-343, March.
    9. Biswas, Shreya & Kumar, Rajnish, 2022. "Bank board network and financial stability in emerging markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PB).
    10. Li, Zhenhua & Gao, Xuan, 2021. "Makers’ relationship network, knowledge acquisition and innovation performance: An empirical analysis from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Peter Li, 2007. "Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 227-246, June.
    12. Ricardo Buettner, 2017. "Getting a job via career-oriented social networking markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 371-385, November.
    13. Tarek Bel Hadj & Adel Ghodbane, 2019. "What Matters Most For Innovation Capability Of Smes: Structural Or Cognitive Features Of Networking?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(07), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Liang, Liang & Alam, Ashraful & Sorwar, Ghulam & Yazdifar, Hassan & Eskandari, Rasol, 2021. "The combined network effect of sparse and interlocked connections in SMEs’ innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Erik Ernesto Vazquez, 2021. "Effect of an e-retailer’s product category and social media platform selection on perceived quality of e-retail products," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 139-157, March.
    16. Ozlem Ozkok & Simon J. Bell & Jagdip Singh & Kwanghui Lim, 2019. "Frontline knowledge networks in open collaboration models for service innovations," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 268-288, December.
    17. Leeves, Gareth.D. & Herbert, Ric., 2014. "Gender differences in social capital investment: Theory and evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 377-385.
    18. Shenggang Ren & Rui Shu & Yongchuan Bao & Xiaohong Chen, 2016. "Linking network ties to entrepreneurial opportunity discovery and exploitation: the role of affective and cognitive trust," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 465-485, June.
    19. Fliaster, Alexander & Golly, Tanja, 2014. "Innovation in small and medium-sized companies: Knowledge integration mechanisms and the role of top managers’ networks," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 25(2), pages 125-147.
    20. Jill E. Perry-Smith & Christina E. Shalley, 2014. "A Social Composition View of Team Creativity: The Role of Member Nationality-Heterogeneous Ties Outside of the Team," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1434-1452, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social networks; distributed work models; simulation experiment.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:853-861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.