IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i4p141-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Specificity of the Activity of Educational Farms in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Zawadka
  • Krystyna Krzyzanowska
  • Piotr Gabryjonczyk

Abstract

Purpose: The study's subject was a poorly recognized and relatively new initiative in the Polish countryside, the educational farms. The purpose of the work is to present the essence of educational farms and the idea of their creation and familiarize the functioning of farms associated with the National Network of Educational Farms. Design/Methodology/Approach: We used the survey technique in the research. We sent the questionnaire to the owners of all educational farms in Poland. We received a return from 79 farms. Findings: The main motive for establishing an educational homestead was the desire to arouse interest in the specificity of living and working in the countryside and rural folklore and traditions. The most important benefit was the income and the pleasure of working with children. The difficulties mainly were the lack of funds for establishing and developing an educational farm. The most frequently implemented goal was an education in the field of environmental and consumer awareness as well as the cultural heritage of villages. The participants of the classes were mainly children of pre-school and school-age. Classes on the cultural heritage of the countryside and arts and crafts enjoyed the greatest interest. Practical Implications: The presented results may be an inspiration and a valuable hint for farm owners who are considering or are at the stage of creating/modifying an educational farm as an undertaking to diversify their agricultural activity. Originality/value: The presented issues are very rarely undertaken in research. Existing studies were very general and not very detailed or were undertaken on a small research sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Zawadka & Krystyna Krzyzanowska & Piotr Gabryjonczyk, 2021. "The Specificity of the Activity of Educational Farms in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 141-156.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:141-156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2568/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sikorska-Wolak, Izabella & Zawadka, Jan, 2016. "Educational Functions Of Agricultural Farms," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 9(2), April.
    2. Wąs, Adam & Malak-Rawlikowska, Agata & Zavalloni, Matteo & Viaggi, Davide & Kobus, Paweł & Sulewski, Piotr, 2021. "In search of factors determining the participation of farmers in agri-environmental schemes – Does only money matter in Poland?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Somayeh Tohidyan Far & Kurosh Rezaei-Moghaddam, 2019. "Multifunctional agriculture: an approach for entrepreneurship development of agricultural sector," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Nagler, Paula & Naudé, Wim, 2017. "Non-farm entrepreneurship in rural sub-Saharan Africa: New empirical evidence," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 175-191.
    5. Abler, David, 2004. "Multifunctionality, Agricultural Policy, and Environmental Policy," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 8-17, April.
    6. Yasuo Ohe, 2018. "Educational tourism in agriculture and identity of farm successors," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(2), pages 167-184, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeeshan & Geetilaxmi Mohapatra & Arun Kumar Giri, 2022. "How Farm Household Spends Their Non-farm Incomes in Rural India? Evidence from Longitudinal Data," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(4), pages 1967-1996, August.
    2. Simplice A. Asongu & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2023. "Female unemployment, mobile money innovations and doing business by females," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    4. Domínguez-Torreiro, Marcos & Soliño, Mario, 2011. "Provided and perceived status quo in choice experiments: Implications for valuing the outputs of multifunctional rural areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2523-2531.
    5. Janssens, C. & Van Den Broeck, G. & Maertens, M. & Lambrecht, I., 2018. "Mother s Non-Farm Entrepreneurship and Child Secondary Education in Rural Ghana," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277038, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Adrian Sadłowski & Wioletta Wrzaszcz & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Anna Matras-Bolibok & Anna Budzyńska & Marek Angowski & Stefan Mann, 2021. "Direct Payments and Sustainable Agricultural Development—The Example of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Katrina Kosec & Hosaena Ghebru & Brian Holtemeyer & Valerie Mueller & Emily Schmidt, 2018. "The Effect of Land Access on Youth Employment and Migration Decisions: Evidence from Rural Ethiopia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(3), pages 931-954.
    8. Laura Barasa & Bethuel K. Kinuthia & Abdelkrim Araar & Stephene Maende & Faith Mariera, 2023. "Nonfarm entrepreneurship, crop output, and household welfare in Tanzania: An exploration of transmission channels," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 762-792, July.
    9. Radulescu, Iuliana Denisa & Iorgovan, Daniela, 2020. "A Short Survey on EU Agriculture Developments: Cropping Patterns, Prices and Policy," Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 2(1), January.
    10. Hassan Shahraki & Ebrahim Heydari, 2019. "Rethinking rural entrepreneurship in the era of globalization: some observations from Iran," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Shengnan Huang & Ehsan Elahi, 2022. "Farmers’ Preferences for Recycling Pesticide Packaging Waste: An Implication of a Discrete Choice Experiment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Simplice A. Asongu, 2023. "Mobile Phone Innovation and Doing Business in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 9(2), pages 238-269, July.
    13. Wang, Jing & Lyu, Kaiyu & Lv, Xinye & Feil, Jan-Henning, 2021. "Rainfall Risk and Nonfarm Self-Employment in Rural China: Does Digital Finance Have a Role to Play?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315326, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Tracy Stobbe & Geerte Cotteleer & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2008. "Hobby Farms and Protection of Farmland in British Columbia," Working Papers 2008-01, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    15. Joshua D. Merfeld & Peter Brummund, 2022. "The importance of specification choices when analyzing sectoral productivity gaps," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 605-616, July.
    16. Lily Kiminami & Shinichi Furuzawa & Akira Kiminami, 2019. "Impacts of multi-functionality of urban agriculture on the creative classes in global mega city: focusing on Shanghai in China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 487-515, June.
    17. De Ayala Bilbao, Amaya & Hoyos Ramos, David & Mariel Chladkova, Petr, 2012. "Landscape valuation through discrete choice experiments: Current practice and future research reflections," BILTOKI 1134-8984, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística).
    18. Ghebru, Hosaena & Amare, Mulubrhan & Mavrotas, George & Ogunniyi, Adebayo, 2018. "Role of land access in youth migration and youth employment decisions: Empirical evidence from rural Nigeria," NSSP working papers 58, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Delprato, Marcos & Chudgar, Amita & Frola, Alessia, 2024. "Spatial education inequality for attainment indicators in sub-saharan Africa and spillovers effects," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina, 2021. "Economic performance of agritourism: an analysis of farms located in a less favoured area in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Educational farm; village; agriculture; farm; innovations; multifunctional development.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:141-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.