IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v146y2024icp295-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of benefits due to adoption of enablers of unimodal road to intermodal railroad freight transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Gandhi, Nevil
  • Kant, Ravi
  • Thakkar, Jitesh J.

Abstract

The adverse environmental consequences arising from road-based logistics operations have prompted stakeholders, including transport service providers, logistics managers, and shippers, to initiate a modal shift from unimodal road to intermodal railroad (IRR) freight transportation. However, the adoption pace of IRR in developing nations is slow. Modal shift enablers (MSEs) facilitate IRR adoption, while modal shift benefits (MSBs) signify favorable performance outcomes from MSEs' application. The main objective of this study is to rank the MSBs resulting from the adoption of MSEs in IRR freight transportation. This study proposes an integrated multi-criteria decision-making framework utilizing the spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (SF-AHP) to evaluate MSEs' weights and the spherical fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (SF-TOPSIS) to rank the MSBs. The case study performed in the Indian logistics sector reveals that ‘government policies and legislation enablers’, ‘infrastructural enablers’ and ‘strategic and management enablers’ are the most significant MSEs, whereas reduction in vehicular pollution and related negative externalities as well as reduction of the freight transport costs including storage and handling charges are most crucial MSBs realized due to adoption of MSEs. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the stability of the ranking. The results help decision-makers in implementing MSEs for MSBs and develop effective IRR adoption strategies. This study also promotes sustainable freight transportation and provides logistics practitioners, researchers, and policymakers with a precise, systematic, and practical decision-support tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Gandhi, Nevil & Kant, Ravi & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2024. "Evaluation of benefits due to adoption of enablers of unimodal road to intermodal railroad freight transportation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 295-311.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:146:y:2024:i:c:p:295-311
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.12.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X23003311
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.12.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyun Chan Kim & Diana Kusumastuti & Alan Nicholson, 2018. "Modal shift for New Zealand shippers for various policy scenarios," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 304-322, September.
    2. Marta Gonzalez-Aregall & Kevin Cullinane & Inge Vierth, 2021. "A Review of Port Initiatives to Promote Freight Modal Shifts in Europe: Evidence from Port Governance Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Violetta Giada Cannas & Federica Ciccullo & Margherita Pero & Roberto Cigolini, 2020. "Sustainable innovation in the dairy supply chain: enabling factors for intermodal transportation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7314-7333, December.
    4. Gupta, Dipti & Dhar, Subash, 2022. "Exploring the freight transportation transitions for mitigation and development pathways of India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 156-175.
    5. Gandhi, Nevil & Kant, Ravi & Thakkar, Jitesh, 2022. "Sustainable performance assessment of rail freight transportation using triple bottom line approach: An application to Indian Railways," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 254-273.
    6. Shankar, Ravi & Pathak, Devendra Kumar & Choudhary, Devendra, 2019. "Decarbonizing freight transportation: An integrated EFA-TISM approach to model enablers of dedicated freight corridors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 85-100.
    7. Tao, Xuezong & Wu, Qin & Zhu, Lichao, 2017. "Mitigation potential of CO2 emissions from modal shift induced by subsidy in hinterland container transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 265-273.
    8. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    9. Kurtuluş, Ercan & Çetin, İsmail Bilge, 2020. "Analysis of modal shift potential towards intermodal transportation in short-distance inland container transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 24-37.
    10. Marzena Kramarz & Edyta Przybylska, 2021. "Multimodal Transport in the Context of Sustainable Development of a City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-29, February.
    11. Daniel Ruben Pinchasik & Inger Beate Hovi & Christian Svendsen Mjøsund & Stein Erik Grønland & Erik Fridell & Martin Jerksjö, 2020. "Crossing Borders and Expanding Modal Shift Measures: Effects on Mode Choice and Emissions from Freight Transport in the Nordics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Salvucci, Raffaele & Gargiulo, Maurizio & Karlsson, Kenneth, 2019. "The role of modal shift in decarbonising the Scandinavian transport sector: Applying substitution elasticities in TIMES-Nordic," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasani Goodarzi, Asefeh & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Paquet, Marc, 2024. "Evaluating the sustainability and resilience of an intermodal transport network leveraging consolidation strategies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Francisco Javier López-Acevedo & María Josefa Herrero & José Ignacio Escavy Fernández & José González Bravo, 2024. "Potential Reduction in Carbon Emissions in the Transport of Aggregates by Switching from Road-Only Transport to an Intermodal Rail/Road System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Rogerson & Vendela Santén & Uni Sallnäs, 2021. "The Influence of Power and Trust on the Initiation and Duration of Modal Shift Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Aalok Kumar & Ramesh Anbanandam, 2020. "A Flexible Policy Framework for Analysing Multimodal Freight Transportation System in India: SAP–LAP and Efficient IRP Method," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 35-52, March.
    3. Damian Bonk & Sylwia Kowalska, 2020. "Modal Choice Preferences in Inland Container Transport in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 99-109.
    4. Daniel Ruben Pinchasik & Inger Beate Hovi & Christian Svendsen Mjøsund & Stein Erik Grønland & Erik Fridell & Martin Jerksjö, 2020. "Crossing Borders and Expanding Modal Shift Measures: Effects on Mode Choice and Emissions from Freight Transport in the Nordics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Jiang, Xiaodan & Fan, Houming & Luo, Meifeng & Xu, Zhenlin, 2020. "Strategic port competition in multimodal network development considering shippers’ choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 68-89.
    6. Tao, Xuezong & Zhu, Lichao, 2020. "Meta-analysis of value of time in freight transportation: A comprehensive review based on discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 213-233.
    7. Jiang, Yonglei & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Peng, Zixuan & Yu, Bin, 2018. "Hinterland patterns of China Railway (CR) express in China under the Belt and Road Initiative: A preliminary analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 189-201.
    8. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Yanming Sun & Shixian Liu & Lei Li, 2022. "Grey Correlation Analysis of Transportation Carbon Emissions under the Background of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Ercan Kurtulus & Ismail Bilge Cetin, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Benefits of Dry Port Usage: A Case of Inland Container Transport in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Chaisri Tarasawatpipat & Thammarak Srimarut & Witthaya Mekhum, 2020. "Seeing Domestic and Industrial Logistic in Context of CO2 Emission: Role of Container Port Traffic, Railway Transport, and Air Transport Intensity in Thailand," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 570-576.
    12. Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Huang, Shuangfa & Vazquez-Brust, Diego, 2020. "Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Olaf Jonkeren & Klaas Friso & Lourentz Hek, 2023. "Changes in external costs and infrastructure costs due to modal shift in freight transport in North-western Europe," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-40, December.
    14. Steffen Jaap Skotvoll Bakker & Jonas Martin & E. Ruben van Beesten & Ingvild Synn{o}ve Brynildsen & Anette Sandvig & Marit Siqveland & Antonia Golab, 2023. "STraM: A strategic network design model for national freight transport decarbonization," Papers 2304.14001, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    15. Shankar, Ravi & Pathak, Devendra Kumar & Choudhary, Devendra, 2019. "Decarbonizing freight transportation: An integrated EFA-TISM approach to model enablers of dedicated freight corridors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 85-100.
    16. Elżbieta Szaruga & Elżbieta Załoga & Arkadiusz Drewnowski & Sylwia Kowalska & Paulina Dąbrosz-Drewnowska, 2024. "The Role of EU Transport Market Liberalization in Shaping Directions of Rail Energy Consumption Rationalization in Relation to the Export of Goods: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-33, June.
    17. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2020. "Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 559-581.
    18. Suchi Kapoor Malhotra & Howard White & Nina Ashley O. Dela Cruz & Ashrita Saran & John Eyers & Denny John & Ella Beveridge & Nina Blöndal, 2021. "Studies of the effectiveness of transport sector interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    19. Zhu, Lichao, 2023. "Comparative evaluation of CO2 emissions from transportation in countries around the world," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Nepal, Rabindra & Yadav, Miklesh Prasad & Katoch, Rupinder & Gupta, Himani & Kumar, Atul, 2024. "Co-movement between carbon emissions and forex market: A tale of COVID-19 outbreak and Russia-Ukraine invasion," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:146:y:2024:i:c:p:295-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.