IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v132y2020icp559-581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar, Aalok
  • Anbanandam, Ramesh

Abstract

Intermodal railroad (IRR) mode of freight transport has been considered as a sustainable and efficient solution for ensuring the sustainability of the freight transport industry, but the IRR transport adoption faces many challenges in real cases. However, so far, studies considered inhibitors of IRR transport under logistics shippers or forwarders' perspectives. Unfortunately, no existing research has evaluated the interrelationships of IRR freight transport inhibitors in emerging economies, nor in Indian Context. This study aims to give a structural model of IRR freight transport inhibitors interrelationships with a case of the Indian freight industry. The considered stakeholders in the present research are academic researchers, freight shippers, and Indian Railways officials’. The considered research framework presents twenty-two inhibitors, that were selected from the previous literature and experts' input. Then, a blend of grey theory and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method (Grey-DEMATEL) was used to identify the causal relationships between the selected inhibitors and the strength of their interrelationships. A Euclidian distance analysis was used to highlight the similarities and differences between stakeholders’ views. All the stakeholders find some common inhibitors such as poor rail freight transport infrastructure, low frequency of freight trains, the poor delivery reliability of rail mode, lack of competition between transport modes, and lack of holistic transportation business model. The unique contribution of present work relies on the fact that no past studies were found, to consider the impact of multiple stakeholders in the intermodal freight business. Moreover, policymakers may take proactive actions to improve the inhibitors of IRR into practices for improving modal balance in emerging economies. Finally, the conclusion and limitations of the present work are highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2020. "Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 559-581.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:132:y:2020:i:c:p:559-581
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856418313995
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elbert, R. & Seikowsky, L., 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 85074, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Woxenius, Johan, 2012. "Directness as a key performance indicator for freight transport chains," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 63-72.
    3. Bergantino, Angela S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Catalano, Mario & Migliore, Marco & Amoroso, Salvatore, 2013. "Taste heterogeneity and latent preferences in the choice behaviour of freight transport operators," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 77-91.
    4. Woxenius, Johan & Bergqvist, Rickard, 2011. "Comparing maritime containers and semi-trailers in the context of hinterland transport by rail," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 680-688.
    5. Masiero, Lorenzo & Hensher, David A., 2010. "Analyzing loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity in a freight transport stated choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 349-358, June.
    6. Amir Samimi & Kazuya Kawamura & Abolfazl Mohammadian, 2011. "A behavioral analysis of freight mode choice decisions," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 857-869, June.
    7. Arnold, Pierre & Peeters, Dominique & Thomas, Isabelle, 2004. "Modelling a rail/road intermodal transportation system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 255-270, May.
    8. Tsamboulas, Dimitrios A. & Kapros, Seraphim, 2003. "Freight village evaluation under uncertainty with public and private financing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 141-156, April.
    9. Verma, Manish & Verter, Vedat, 2010. "A lead-time based approach for planning rail-truck intermodal transportation of dangerous goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 696-706, May.
    10. Macharis, Cathy & Pekin, Ethem, 2009. "Assessing policy measures for the stimulation of intermodal transport: a GIS-based policy analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 500-508.
    11. Fredrik Bärthel & Johan Woxenius, 2004. "Developing intermodal transport for small flows over short distances," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 403-424, October.
    12. Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María & García-Menéndez, Leandro & Román, Concepción, 2015. "Modelling mode choice for freight transport using advanced choice experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 252-267.
    13. Arunotayanun, Kriangkrai & Polak, John W., 2011. "Taste heterogeneity and market segmentation in freight shippers' mode choice behaviour," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 138-148, March.
    14. Woxenius, Johan, 2007. "Alternative transport network designs and their implications for intermodal transhipment technologies," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 35, pages 27-45.
    15. Janic, Milan, 2008. "An assessment of the performance of the European long intermodal freight trains (LIFTS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1326-1339, December.
    16. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason & Lambert, Bruce, 2011. "The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1379-1386.
    17. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    18. Shinghal, Nalin & Fowkes, Tony, 2002. "Freight mode choice and adaptive stated preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 367-378, September.
    19. Yvonne Bontekoning & Hugo Priemus, 2004. "Breakthrough innovations in intermodal freight transport," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 335-345, October.
    20. Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2013. "A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 281-292.
    21. Tsamboulas, Dimitrios & Vrenken, Huub & Lekka, Anna-Maria, 2007. "Assessment of a transport policy potential for intermodal mode shift on a European scale," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 715-733, October.
    22. Lindholm, Maria & Behrends, Sönke, 2012. "Challenges in urban freight transport planning – a review in the Baltic Sea Region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 129-136.
    23. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    24. Behrends, Sönke, 2017. "Burden or opportunity for modal shift? – Embracing the urban dimension of intermodal road-rail transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 10-16.
    25. Truschkin, Eugen & Elbert, Ralf, 2013. "Horizontal transshipment technologies as enablers of combined transport: Impact of transport policies on the modal split," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 91-109.
    26. Baindur, Deepak & Viegas, José Manuel, 2011. "An agent based model concept for assessing modal share in inter-regional freight transport markets," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1093-1105.
    27. Jason Monios, 2015. "Integrating intermodal transport with logistics: a case study of the UK retail sector," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 347-374, April.
    28. Verma, Manish & Verter, Vedat & Zufferey, Nicolas, 2012. "A bi-objective model for planning and managing rail-truck intermodal transportation of hazardous materials," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 132-149.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fulzele, Vijayta & Shankar, Ravi, 2022. "Improving freight transportation performance through sustainability best practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 285-299.
    2. Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2021. "The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Feng, Xuehao & Song, Rui & Yin, Wenwei & Yin, Xiaowei & Zhang, Ruiyou, 2023. "Multimodal transportation network with cargo containerization technology: Advantages and challenges," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 128-143.
    4. Agata Marcysiak, 2020. "Analysis of the Rail Transport Market in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 819-832.
    5. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Thompson, Russell, 2022. "Designing sustainable intermodal freight transportation networks using a controlled rail tariff discounting policy – The Iranian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 59-77.
    6. Halina Brdulak & Anna Brdulak, 2021. "Challenges and Threats Faced in 2020 by International Logistics Companies Operating on the Polish Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Vishal Kashav & Chandra Prakash Garg & Rupesh Kumar, 2023. "Ranking the strategies to overcome the barriers of the maritime supply chain (MSC) of containerized freight under fuzzy environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1223-1268, May.
    8. Gupta, Dipti & Dhar, Subash, 2022. "Exploring the freight transportation transitions for mitigation and development pathways of India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 156-175.
    9. Marzena Kramarz & Katarzyna Dohn & Edyta Przybylska & Lilla Knop, 2020. "Scenarios for the Development of Multimodal Transport in the TRITIA Cross-Border Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-41, August.
    10. Nisha Mary Thomas, 2023. "Modeling key enablers influencing FinTechs offering SME credit services: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Benjamin Nitsche, 2021. "Embracing the Potentials of Intermodal Transport in Ethiopia: Strategies to Facilitate Export-Led Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Vladimir Simić & Radovan Soušek & Stefan Jovčić, 2020. "Picture Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Risk Assessment of Railway Infrastructure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Emilia Teresa Skupień, 2024. "Assessment of Factors Influencing the Development of Inland Navigation in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Jia, Xiaohui & Cui, Yongmei, 2021. "Examining interrelationships of barriers in the evolution of maritime port smartification from a systematic perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 49-58.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    2. Verena Maria Stockhammer & Sarah Pfoser & Karin Markvica & Jürgen Zajicek & Matthias Prandtstetter, 2021. "Behavioural Biases Distorting the Demand for Environmentally Friendly Freight Transport Modes: An Overview and Potential Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    3. Aalok Kumar & Ramesh Anbanandam, 2020. "A Flexible Policy Framework for Analysing Multimodal Freight Transportation System in India: SAP–LAP and Efficient IRP Method," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 35-52, March.
    4. Tao, Xuezong & Zhu, Lichao, 2020. "Meta-analysis of value of time in freight transportation: A comprehensive review based on discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 213-233.
    5. Kim, Nam Seok & Van Wee, Bert, 2011. "The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 859-875.
    6. Feo-Valero, María & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Román, Concepción, 2016. "Analyzing discrepancies between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for freight transport attributes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 151-164.
    7. Jawaher Binsuwadan & Gerard De Jong & Richard Batley & Phill Wheat, 2022. "The value of travel time savings in freight transport: a meta-analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1183-1209, August.
    8. Khakdaman, Masoud & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2020. "Shippers’ willingness to delegate modal control in freight transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Zhang, Rong & Zhu, Lichao, 2019. "Threshold incorporating freight choice modeling for hinterland leg transportation chain of export containers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 858-872.
    10. Chen, Hong & Cullinane, Kevin & Liu, Nan, 2017. "Developing a model for measuring the resilience of a port-hinterland container transportation network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 282-301.
    11. Zhuo Zhang & Dezhi Zhang & Lóránt A. Tavasszy & Qinglin Li, 2020. "Multicriteria Intermodal Freight Network Optimal Problem with Heterogeneous Preferences under Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Woodburn, Allan, 2013. "Effects of rail network enhancement on port hinterland container activity: a United Kingdom case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 162-169.
    13. Monios, Jason & Bergqvist, Rickard, 2019. "The transport geography of electric and autonomous vehicles in road freight networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Behrends, Sönke, 2017. "Burden or opportunity for modal shift? – Embracing the urban dimension of intermodal road-rail transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 10-16.
    15. Elifcan Göçmen & Rızvan Erol, 2018. "The Problem of Sustainable Intermodal Transportation: A Case Study of an International Logistics Company, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Román, Concepción & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María, 2017. "A latent class model with attribute cut-offs to analyze modal choice for freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 212-227.
    17. Konstantinus, Abisai & Zuidgeest, Mark & Hess, Stephane & de Jong, Gerard, 2020. "Assessing inter-urban freight mode choice preference for short-sea shipping in the Southern African Development Community region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    19. Kurtuluş, Ercan & Çetin, İsmail Bilge, 2020. "Analysis of modal shift potential towards intermodal transportation in short-distance inland container transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 24-37.
    20. Truschkin, Eugen & Elbert, Ralf, 2013. "Horizontal transshipment technologies as enablers of combined transport: Impact of transport policies on the modal split," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 91-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:132:y:2020:i:c:p:559-581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.