IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v184y2024ics1366554524000474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explainable train delay propagation: A graph attention network approach

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Ping
  • Guo, Jingwei
  • Liu, Shu
  • Corman, Francesco

Abstract

Explaining train delay propagation using influence factors (to find the determinants) is essential for transport planning and train operation management. Due to high interpretability to train operations, graph/network models, e.g., Bayesian networks and alternative graphs, are extensively used in the train delay propagation/prediction problem. In these graph/network models, nodes represent train arrival/departure/passage events, whereas arcs describe train headway/running/dwelling processes. However, previously proposed graph/network models do not have edge weights, making them incapable of apperceiving the diverse influences of factors on train delay propagation/prediction. The train dwelling, running, and headway times vary over time, space, and train services. This potentially makes these factors have diverse strengths on train operations. We innovatively use the Graph Attention Network (GAT) to model the train delay propagation. An attention mechanism is used in the GAT model, allowing the GAT model to have arcs with diverse weights (learned from data). This enables the GAT model to discern the nodes’ diverse influences; thus, with the learned importance coefficients, the model can be distinctly explained by the influencing factors. Further, the model’s accuracy is expected to be improved, because the GAT model (with the attention mechanism) can pay more attention (represented by the learned weights) to the significant factors/nodes. The proposed GAT model was calibrated on operation data from the Dutch railway network. The results show that: (1) the influence factors contribute diversely to the delay propagation, and the train headway is the determinant of train delay propagation; (2) the accuracy of the proposed GAT model is significantly improved (because of the attention mechanism), compared against other state-of-the-art graph/network models. In a word, the proposed GAT method improves the interpretability of delay propagation and the accuracy of delay prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Ping & Guo, Jingwei & Liu, Shu & Corman, Francesco, 2024. "Explainable train delay propagation: A graph attention network approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524000474
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524000474
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ZhongCan Li & Chao Wen & Rui Hu & Chuanlin Xu & Ping Huang & Xi Jiang, 2021. "Near-term train delay prediction in the Dutch railways network," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(6), pages 520-539, November.
    2. Wang, Pengling & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2017. "Multi-train trajectory optimization for energy efficiency and delay recovery on single-track railway lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 340-361.
    3. Hauke Jan & Kossowski Tomasz, 2011. "Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 87-93, June.
    4. Huang, Ping & Wen, Chao & Fu, Liping & Lessan, Javad & Jiang, Chaozhe & Peng, Qiyuan & Xu, Xinyue, 2020. "Modeling train operation as sequences: A study of delay prediction with operation and weather data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Meloni, Carlo & Pranzo, Marco & Samà, Marcella, 2021. "Risk of delay evaluation in real-time train scheduling with uncertain dwell times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Carey, Malachy & Kwiecinski, Andrzej, 1994. "Stochastic approximation to the effects of headways on knock-on delays of trains," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 251-267, August.
    7. Yuan, Jianxin & Hansen, Ingo A., 2007. "Optimizing capacity utilization of stations by estimating knock-on train delays," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 202-217, February.
    8. Chao Wen & Zhongcan Li & Javad Lessan & Liping Fu & Ping Huang & Chaozhe Jiang, 2017. "Statistical investigation on train primary delay based on real records: evidence from Wuhan–Guangzhou HSR," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 170-189, July.
    9. Meester, Ludolf E. & Muns, Sander, 2007. "Stochastic delay propagation in railway networks and phase-type distributions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 218-230, February.
    10. Matteo Fischetti & Domenico Salvagnin & Arrigo Zanette, 2009. "Fast Approaches to Improve the Robustness of a Railway Timetable," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 321-335, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Spanninger & Beda Büchel & Francesco Corman, 2023. "Train Delay Predictions Using Markov Chains Based on Process Time Deviations and Elastic State Boundaries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Huang, Ping & Wen, Chao & Fu, Liping & Lessan, Javad & Jiang, Chaozhe & Peng, Qiyuan & Xu, Xinyue, 2020. "Modeling train operation as sequences: A study of delay prediction with operation and weather data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Harshad Khadilkar, 2017. "Data-Enabled Stochastic Modeling for Evaluating Schedule Robustness of Railway Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1161-1176, November.
    4. Tiong, Kah Yong & Ma, Zhenliang & Palmqvist, Carl-William, 2023. "Analyzing factors contributing to real-time train arrival delays using seemingly unrelated regression models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Jovanović, Predrag & Kecman, Pavle & Bojović, Nebojša & Mandić, Dragomir, 2017. "Optimal allocation of buffer times to increase train schedule robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 44-54.
    6. Leachman, Robert C. & Jula, Payman, 2012. "Estimating flow times for containerized imports from Asia to the United States through the Western rail network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 296-309.
    7. Chao Wen & Weiwei Mou & Ping Huang & Zhongcan Li, 2020. "A predictive model of train delays on a railway line," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 470-488, April.
    8. Bernal, Margarita & Welch, Eric W. & Sriraj, P.S., 2016. "The effect of slow zones on ridership: An analysis of the Chicago Transit Authority “El” Blue Line," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 11-21.
    9. Jens Parbo & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2016. "Passenger Perspectives in Railway Timetabling: A Literature Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 500-526, July.
    10. Manuel Blanco-Castillo & Adrián Fernández-Rodríguez & Antonio Fernández-Cardador & Asunción P. Cucala, 2022. "Eco-Driving in Railway Lines Considering the Uncertainty Associated with Climatological Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Lian, Deheng & Mo, Pengli & D’Ariano, Andrea & Gao, Ziyou & Yang, Lixing, 2024. "Energy-saving time allocation strategy with uncertain dwell times in urban rail transit: Two-stage stochastic model and nested dynamic programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 219-242.
    12. Gert Janssenswillen & Benoît Depaire & Sabine Verboven, 2018. "Detecting train reroutings with process mining," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Krüger, Niclas A. & Vierth , Inge & Fakhraei Roudsari, Farzad, 2013. "Spatial, temporal and size distribution of freight train delays: evidence from Sweden," Working papers in Transport Economics 2013:8, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    14. Agbelie, Bismark & Libnao, Kathleen, 2018. "Unobserved heterogeneity analysis of rail transit incident delays," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 39-43.
    15. Zhongcan Li & Ping Huang & Chao Wen & Yixiong Tang & Xi Jiang, 2020. "Predictive models for influence of primary delays using high‐speed train operation records," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(8), pages 1198-1212, December.
    16. Wei, Dali & Liu, Hongchao & Qin, Yong, 2015. "Modeling cascade dynamics of railway networks under inclement weather," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 95-122.
    17. Agumas Alamirew Mebratu, 2024. "Theoretical foundations of voluntary tax compliance: evidence from a developing country," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    18. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Javier García López & Raffaele Sisto & Javier Benayas & Álvaro de Juanes & Julio Lumbreras & Carlos Mataix, 2021. "Assessment of the Results and Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Adriana Gómez-Cabrera & Amalia Sanz-Benlloch & Laura Montalban-Domingo & Jose Luis Ponz-Tienda & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Identification of Factors Affecting the Performance of Rural Road Projects in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524000474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.