IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v34y2000i1p53-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trip distribution forecasting with multilayer perceptron neural networks: A critical evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Mozolin, M.
  • Thill, J. -C.
  • Lynn Usery, E.

Abstract

This study compares the performance of multilayer perceptron neural networks and maximum-likelihood doubly-constrained models for commuter trip distribution. Our experiments produce overwhelming evidence at variance with the existing literature that the predictive accuracy of neural network spatial interaction models is inferior to that of maximum-likelihood doubly-constrained models with an exponential function of distance decay. The study points to several likely causes of neural network underperformance, including model non-transferability, insufficient ability to generalize, and reliance on sigmoid activation functions, and their inductive nature. It is concluded that current perceptron neural networks do not provide an appropriate modeling approach to forecasting trip distribution over a planning horizon for which distribution predictors (number of workers, number of residents, commuting distance) are beyond their base-year domain of definition.

Suggested Citation

  • Mozolin, M. & Thill, J. -C. & Lynn Usery, E., 2000. "Trip distribution forecasting with multilayer perceptron neural networks: A critical evaluation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 53-73, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:34:y:2000:i:1:p:53-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(99)00014-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M Batty & S Mackie, 1972. "The Calibration of Gravity, Entropy, and Related Models of Spatial Interaction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 4(2), pages 205-233, June.
    2. Fischer, Manfred M. & Gopal, Sucharita, 1994. "Artificial Neural Networks. A New Approach to Modelling Interregional Telecommunication Flows," MPRA Paper 77822, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. M Batty & P K Sikdar, 1982. "Spatial Aggregation in Gravity Models. 1. An Information-Theoretic Framework," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 14(3), pages 377-405, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Halás, Marián & Klapka, Pavel & Kladivo, Petr, 2014. "Distance-decay functions for daily travel-to-work flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 107-119.
    2. Javier Rubio-Herrero & Jesús Muñuzuri, 2021. "Indirect estimation of interregional freight flows with a real-valued genetic algorithm," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 257-282, February.
    3. Cabrera Delgado, Jorge & Bonnel, Patrick, 2016. "Level of aggregation of zoning and temporal transferability of the gravity distribution model: The case of Lyon," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 17-26.
    4. Shadi Haj-Yahia & Omar Mansour & Tomer Toledo, 2023. "Incorporating Domain Knowledge in Deep Neural Networks for Discrete Choice Models," Papers 2306.00016, arXiv.org.
    5. Shenhao Wang & Baichuan Mo & Jinhua Zhao, 2020. "Theory-based residual neural networks: A synergy of discrete choice models and deep neural networks," Papers 2010.11644, arXiv.org.
    6. Wang, Lanlan & Xu, Jintao & Zheng, Xinye & Qin, Ping, "undated". "Will a Driving Restriction Policy Reduce Car Trips? A Case Study of Beijing, China," RFF Working Paper Series dp-13-11-efd, Resources for the Future.
    7. Wang, Shenhao & Mo, Baichuan & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "Theory-based residual neural networks: A synergy of discrete choice models and deep neural networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 333-358.
    8. Manfred M. Fischer, 2009. "Principles of Neural Spatial Interaction Modeling," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Michael Sonis & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings (ed.), Tool Kits in Regional Science, chapter 8, pages 199-214, Springer.
    9. Tranos, Emmanouil & Incera, Andre Carrascal & Willis, George, 2022. "Using the web to predict regional trade flows: data extraction, modelling, and validation," OSF Preprints 9bu5z, Center for Open Science.
    10. Fischer, Manfred M. & Reismann, Martin, 2002. "A methodology for neural spatial interaction modelling," ERSA conference papers ersa02p034, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Jingqiu Guo & Yangzexi Liu & Lanfang Zhang & Yibing Wang, 2018. "Driving Behaviour Style Study with a Hybrid Deep Learning Framework Based on GPS Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Wang, Shenhao & Wang, Qingyi & Bailey, Nate & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "Deep neural networks for choice analysis: A statistical learning theory perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 60-81.
    13. Wang, Shenhao & Wang, Qingyi & Zhao, Jinhua, 2020. "Multitask learning deep neural networks to combine revealed and stated preference data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    14. Shenhao Wang & Baichuan Mo & Stephane Hess & Jinhua Zhao, 2021. "Comparing hundreds of machine learning classifiers and discrete choice models in predicting travel behavior: an empirical benchmark," Papers 2102.01130, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cabrera Delgado, Jorge & Bonnel, Patrick, 2016. "Level of aggregation of zoning and temporal transferability of the gravity distribution model: The case of Lyon," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 17-26.
    2. Roger Bivand, 2008. "Implementing Representations Of Space In Economic Geography," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Tsang, Wai Fai, 2004. "Comparative modelling of interregional transport flows: Applications to multimodal European freight transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 584-602, June.
    4. Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Sabella, E., 1999. "A comparison of the performance of Discrete Choice Models and Biocomputing Models in Transport Systems Analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa037, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp & Wai Fai Tsang, 1997. "European Freight Transport Analysis using Neural Networks and Logit Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 97-032/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp & Enrico Sabella, 1998. "Evolutionary algorithms: Overview and applications to European transport," ERSA conference papers ersa98p412, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Bolis, Simona, 1997. "European freight transport and the environment: empirical applications and scenarios," Serie Research Memoranda 0033, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Fischer, Manfred M. & Reismann, Martin, 2002. "A Methodology for Neural Spatial Interaction Modeling," MPRA Paper 77794, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. R E Kalaba & J E Moore II & R Xu & G J Chen, 1999. "Nonlinear Estimation with Associative Memories and Machine Evaluation of Derivatives: An Application to Calibrating Spatial Interaction Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(3), pages 441-457, March.
    10. Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Tsang, Wai-Fai, 1997. "Neural network and spatial interaction analysis of European commodity flows," Serie Research Memoranda 0068, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    11. Fischer, Manfred M. & Openshaw, Stan, 1995. "A Framework for Research on Spatial Analysis Relevant to Geo-Statistical Informations Systems in Europe," MPRA Paper 77814, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. S Openshaw, 1998. "Neural Network, Genetic, and Fuzzy Logic Models of Spatial Interaction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(10), pages 1857-1872, October.
    13. B Rubenstein-Montano & I Zandi, 1999. "Application of a Genetic Algorithm to Policy Planning: The Case of Solid Waste," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(6), pages 893-907, December.
    14. Fischer, Manfred M. & Reismann, Martin & Hlavackova-Schindler, Katerina, 2000. "Evaluating Neural Spatial Interaction. Modelling By Bootstrapping," ERSA conference papers ersa00p370, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Stępniak, Marcin & Jacobs-Crisioni, Chris, 2017. "Reducing the uncertainty induced by spatial aggregation in accessibility and spatial interaction applications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 17-29.
    16. Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Sabella, Enrico, 2001. "New advances in spatial network modelling: Towards evolutionary algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 385-401, January.
    17. Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Nobilio, Lucia, 1997. "Spatial modal patterns in European freight transport networks: results of neurocomputing and logit models," Serie Research Memoranda 0029, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    18. Shen, Yao, 2019. "Segregation through space: A scope of the flow-based spatial interaction model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 10-23.
    19. Erik Bergkvist, 2001. "The value of time and forecasting of flowsin freight transportation," ERSA conference papers ersa01p271, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Cho, Cheol-Joo, 1998. "An equity-efficiency trade-off model for the optimum location of medical care facilities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-112, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:34:y:2000:i:1:p:53-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.