IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa02p034.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A methodology for neural spatial interaction modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, Manfred M.
  • Reismann, Martin

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for neural spatial interaction modelling. Particular emphasis is laid on design, estimation and performance issues in both cases, unconstrained and singly constrained spatial interaction. Families of classical neural network models, but also less classical ones such as product unit neural network models are considered. Some novel classes of product unit and summation unit models are presented for the case of origin or destination constrained spatial interaction flows. The models are based on a modular connectionist architecture that may be viewed as a linked collection of functionally independent neural modules with identical feedforward topologies, operating under supervised learning algorithms. Parameter estimation is viewed as Maximum Likelihood (ML) learning. The nonconvex nature of the loss function makes the Alopex procedure, a global search procedure, an attractive and appropriate optimising scheme for ML learning. A benchmark comparison against the classical gravity models illustrates the superiority of both, the unconstrained and the origin constrained, neural network model versions in terms of generalization performance measured by Kullback and Leibler`s information criterion. Hereby, the authors make use of the bootstrapping pairs approach to overcome the largely neglected problem of sensitivity to the specific splitting of the data into training, internal validation and testing data sets, and to get a better statistical picture of prediction variability of the models. Keywords: Neural spatial interaction models, origin constrained or destination constrained spatial interaction, product unit network, Alopex procedure, boostrapping, benchmark performance tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, Manfred M. & Reismann, Martin, 2002. "A methodology for neural spatial interaction modelling," ERSA conference papers ersa02p034, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/034.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Claude Thill & Mikhail Mozolin, 2000. "Feedforward Neural Networks for Spatial Interaction: Are They Trustworthy Forecasting Tools?," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Aura Reggiani (ed.), Spatial Economic Science, chapter 17, pages 355-381, Springer.
    2. Fischer, Manfred M. & Gopal, Sucharita, 1994. "Artificial Neural Networks. A New Approach to Modelling Interregional Telecommunication Flows," MPRA Paper 77822, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Fischer, Manfred M & Nijkamp, Peter, 1992. "Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 26(1), pages 3-17, April.
    4. Mozolin, M. & Thill, J. -C. & Lynn Usery, E., 2000. "Trip distribution forecasting with multilayer perceptron neural networks: A critical evaluation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 53-73, January.
    5. Fischer, Manfred M. & Reismann, Martin & Hlavackova-Schindler, Katerina, 2000. "Evaluating Neural Spatial Interaction. Modelling By Bootstrapping," ERSA conference papers ersa00p370, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Manfred M. Fischer & Yee Leung, 1998. "A genetic-algorithms based evolutionary computational neural network for modelling spatial interaction data," ERSA conference papers ersa98p478, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Manfred M. Fischer & Martin Reismann, 2001. "Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows," ERSA conference papers ersa01p165, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Aura Reggiani (ed.), 2000. "Spatial Economic Science," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-642-59787-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manfred M. Fischer, 2009. "Principles of Neural Spatial Interaction Modeling," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Michael Sonis & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings (ed.), Tool Kits in Regional Science, chapter 8, pages 199-214, Springer.
    2. Fischer, Manfred M., 2006. "Neural Networks. A General Framework for Non-Linear Function Approximation," MPRA Paper 77776, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Manfred M. Fischer, 2002. "Learning in neural spatial interaction models: A statistical perspective," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 287-299, October.
    4. Fischer, Manfred M. & Scherngell, Thomas & Jansenberger, Eva, 2005. "The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers between High-Technology Firms in Europe. Evidence from a Spatial Interaction Modelling Perspective," MPRA Paper 77786, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Rafael Lata & Sidonia Proff & Thomas Brenner, 2018. "The influence of distance types on co-patenting and co-publishing in the USA and Europe over time," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(1), pages 49-71, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manfred M. Fischer, 2009. "Principles of Neural Spatial Interaction Modeling," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Michael Sonis & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings (ed.), Tool Kits in Regional Science, chapter 8, pages 199-214, Springer.
    2. Fischer, Manfred M., 2006. "Neural Networks. A General Framework for Non-Linear Function Approximation," MPRA Paper 77776, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Tsang, Wai Fai, 2004. "Comparative modelling of interregional transport flows: Applications to multimodal European freight transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 584-602, June.
    4. Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Sabella, E., 1999. "A comparison of the performance of Discrete Choice Models and Biocomputing Models in Transport Systems Analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa037, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp & Enrico Sabella, 1998. "Evolutionary algorithms: Overview and applications to European transport," ERSA conference papers ersa98p412, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Longhi, Simonetta & Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Blien, Uwe, 2002. "Forecasting regional labour markets in Germany: an evaluation of the performance of neural network analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa02p117, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Roberto Patuelli & Peter Nijkamp & Simonetta Longhi & Aura Reggiani, 2008. "Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms as Forecasting Tools: A Case Study on German Regions," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(4), pages 701-722, August.
    8. Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Sabella, Enrico, 2001. "New advances in spatial network modelling: Towards evolutionary algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 385-401, January.
    9. Roberto Patuelli & Simonetta Longhi & Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp, 2005. "Multicriteria Analysis of Neural Network Forecasting Models: An Application to German Regional Labour Markets," Experimental 0511001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Roberto Patuelli & Peter Nijkamp & Simonetta Longhi & Aura Reggiani, 2008. "Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms as Forecasting Tools: A Case Study on German Regions," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(4), pages 701-722, August.
    11. Michael Batty & Jake Desyllas & Elspeth Duxbury, 2003. "Safety in Numbers? Modelling Crowds and Designing Control for the Notting Hill Carnival," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1573-1590, July.
    12. Roger Bivand, 2008. "Implementing Representations Of Space In Economic Geography," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 1-27, February.
    13. Tranos, Emmanouil & Incera, Andre Carrascal & Willis, George, 2022. "Using the web to predict regional trade flows: data extraction, modelling, and validation," OSF Preprints 9bu5z, Center for Open Science.
    14. Cabrera Delgado, Jorge & Bonnel, Patrick, 2016. "Level of aggregation of zoning and temporal transferability of the gravity distribution model: The case of Lyon," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 17-26.
    15. Taupier, Richard & Willis, Cleve E., 1994. "Geographic Information Systems And Applied Economics: An Initial Discussion Of Potential Applications And Contributions," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-10, October.
    16. Krisztin, Tamás, 2018. "Semi-parametric spatial autoregressive models in freight generation modeling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 121-143.
    17. Gianfranco Piras & Kieran Donaghy & Giuseppe Arbia, 2007. "Nonlinear regional economic dynamics: continuous-time specification, estimation and stability analysis," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 311-344, December.
    18. Javier Rubio-Herrero & Jesús Muñuzuri, 2023. "Sparse regression for data-driven deterrence functions in gravity models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 153-174, April.
    19. Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp & Wai Fai Tsang, 1997. "European Freight Transport Analysis using Neural Networks and Logit Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 97-032/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Patuelli, Roberto & Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Bade, Franz-Josef, 2010. "The evolution of the commuting network in Germany: Spatial and connectivity patterns," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 2(3), pages 5-37.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    neural spatial interaction models; origin constrained or destination constrained spatial interaction; product unit network; alopex procedure; boostrapping; benchmark performance tests.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.