IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v65y2014icp105-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing first-in–first-out in the cell transmission model for networks

Author

Listed:
  • Carey, Malachy
  • Bar-Gera, Hillel
  • Watling, David
  • Balijepalli, Chandra

Abstract

In traffic assignment models with time-varying flows (dynamic network loading or dynamic traffic assignment), overtaking behaviour is normally not included in the model and, in that case, it is important that the model at least approximates first-in–first-out (FIFO), to prevent deviations from FIFO that are arbitrary or unrealistic or not physically possible. For the cell transmission model (CTM) it has recently been shown that the usual recommended method for preserving FIFO will ensure FIFO for each cell taken separately but does not fully ensure FIFO in the transition between cells and hence does not fully ensure FIFO for sequences of cells or for links or for routes. As a result, deviations from FIFO can easily occur and cumulate along the links or routes. In view of that, we define and analyse three different levels of satisfaction or approximation of FIFO, together with corresponding methods for achieving them. Two of these are existing methods and one is new. We develop, analyse and compare the three methods and the extent to which each of them adheres to FIFO for sequences of cells and links or routes. Also, for two of the methods we present a more detailed algorithm for applying them within the CTM. The paper is concerned with how to implement FIFO in the CTM and not with testing for FIFO or measuring deviations from FIFO.

Suggested Citation

  • Carey, Malachy & Bar-Gera, Hillel & Watling, David & Balijepalli, Chandra, 2014. "Implementing first-in–first-out in the cell transmission model for networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 105-118.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:105-118
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261514000514
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wong, G. C. K. & Wong, S. C., 2002. "A multi-class traffic flow model - an extension of LWR model with heterogeneous drivers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 827-841, November.
    2. Jin, Wen-Long, 2007. "A dynamical system model of the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 32-48, January.
    3. Blumberg, Michal & Bar-Gera, Hillel, 2009. "Consistent node arrival order in dynamic network loading models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 285-300, March.
    4. Boel, René & Mihaylova, Lyudmila, 2006. "A compositional stochastic model for real time freeway traffic simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 319-334, May.
    5. Carey, Malachy, 1992. "Nonconvexity of the dynamic traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 127-133, April.
    6. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    7. Terry L. Friesz & David Bernstein & Tony E. Smith & Roger L. Tobin & B. W. Wie, 1993. "A Variational Inequality Formulation of the Dynamic Network User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 179-191, February.
    8. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    9. Malachy Carey & Y. E. Ge & Mark McCartney, 2003. "A Whole-Link Travel-Time Model with Desirable Properties," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 83-96, February.
    10. Lo, Hong K. & Szeto, W. Y., 2002. "A cell-based variational inequality formulation of the dynamic user optimal assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 421-443, June.
    11. Cayford, Randall & Lin, Wei-Hua & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1997. "The Netcell Simulation Package: Technical Description," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4j27j106, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. Long, Jiancheng & Gao, Ziyou & Szeto, W.Y., 2011. "Discretised link travel time models based on cumulative flows: Formulations and properties," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 232-254, January.
    13. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    14. Daoli Zhu & Patrice Marcotte, 2000. "On the Existence of Solutions to the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 402-414, November.
    15. Sumalee, A. & Zhong, R.X. & Pan, T.L. & Szeto, W.Y., 2011. "Stochastic cell transmission model (SCTM): A stochastic dynamic traffic model for traffic state surveillance and assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 507-533, March.
    16. Y. W. Xu & J. H. Wu & M. Florian & P. Marcotte & D. L. Zhu, 1999. "Advances in the Continuous Dynamic Network Loading Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 341-353, November.
    17. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 261-276, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jiawen & Zou, Linzhi & Zhao, Jing & Wang, Xinwei, 2024. "Dynamic capacity drop propagation in incident-affected networks: Traffic state modeling with SIS-CTM," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 637(C).
    2. Hoang, Nam H. & Vu, Hai L. & Panda, Manoj & Lo, Hong K., 2019. "A linear framework for dynamic user equilibrium traffic assignment in a single origin-destination capacitated network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 329-352.
    3. Jin, Hui & Liu, Yue & Wu, Telan & Zhang, Yanpei, 2022. "Site-specific optimization of bus stop locations and designs over a corridor," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 599(C).
    4. Bar-Gera, Hillel & Carey, Malachy, 2017. "Representation requirements for perfect first-in-first-out verification in continuous flow dynamic models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 284-301.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M Carey, 2009. "A framework for user equilibrium dynamic traffic assignment," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(3), pages 395-410, March.
    2. Carey, Malachy & Humphreys, Paul & McHugh, Marie & McIvor, Ronan, 2014. "Extending travel-time based models for dynamic network loading and assignment, to achieve adherence to first-in-first-out and link capacities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 90-104.
    3. Carey, Malachy & Watling, David, 2012. "Dynamic traffic assignment approximating the kinematic wave model: System optimum, marginal costs, externalities and tolls," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 634-648.
    4. Ke Han & Gabriel Eve & Terry L. Friesz, 2019. "Computing Dynamic User Equilibria on Large-Scale Networks with Software Implementation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 869-902, September.
    5. Friesz, Terry L. & Kim, Taeil & Kwon, Changhyun & Rigdon, Matthew A., 2011. "Approximate network loading and dual-time-scale dynamic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 176-207, January.
    6. Carey, Malachy & Ge, Y. E., 2003. "Comparing whole-link travel time models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 905-926, December.
    7. Malachy Carey & Y. Ge, 2012. "Comparison of Methods for Path Flow Reassignment for Dynamic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 337-376, September.
    8. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    9. Flötteröd, G. & Osorio, C., 2017. "Stochastic network link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 180-209.
    10. Rui Ma & Xuegang (Jeff) Ban & Jong-Shi Pang, 2018. "A Link-Based Differential Complementarity System Formulation for Continuous-Time Dynamic User Equilibria with Queue Spillbacks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 564-592, June.
    11. Jabari, Saif Eddin & Liu, Henry X., 2013. "A stochastic model of traffic flow: Gaussian approximation and estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 15-41.
    12. Jiancheng Long & Wai Yuen Szeto, 2019. "Link-Based System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems in General Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 167-182, January.
    13. Samitha Samaranayake & Walid Krichene & Jack Reilly & Maria Laura Delle Monache & Paola Goatin & Alexandre Bayen, 2018. "Discrete-Time System Optimal Dynamic Traffic Assignment (SO-DTA) with Partial Control for Physical Queuing Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 982-1001, August.
    14. Malachy Carey & Y. E. Ge, 2005. "Convergence of a Discretised Travel-Time Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 25-38, February.
    15. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Huang, Hai-Jun & Gao, Ziyou, 2015. "An intersection-movement-based stochastic dynamic user optimal route choice model for assessing network performance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 182-217.
    16. Garcia-Rodenas, Ricardo & Lopez-Garcia, Maria Luz & Nino-Arbelaez, Alejandro & Verastegui-Rayo, Doroteo, 2006. "A continuous whole-link travel time model with occupancy constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1455-1471, December.
    17. Kachani, Soulaymane & Perakis, Georgia, 2006. "Fluid dynamics models and their applications in transportation and pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 496-517, April.
    18. Storm, Pieter Jacob & Mandjes, Michel & van Arem, Bart, 2022. "Efficient evaluation of stochastic traffic flow models using Gaussian process approximation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 126-144.
    19. Mohammadian, Saeed & Zheng, Zuduo & Haque, Md. Mazharul & Bhaskar, Ashish, 2021. "Performance of continuum models for realworld traffic flows: Comprehensive benchmarking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 132-167.
    20. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:105-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.