IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v78y2024ics0160791x24001611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The utility of remote work solutions in the post-pandemic era: Exploring the mediating effects of productivity and work flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Heetae

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a comprehensive research model to investigate the factors that impact the continuance intention to use remote work solutions. A new research model focusing on the mediating impacts of productivity and work flexibility was developed based on the TOE framework to explore how technological, organizational, and environmental factors influence the intention to use RWS post-pandemic era. Data were collected through a survey of 411 current RWS users in South Korea and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that productivity and work flexibility exert significant mediating effects on the intention to continue using RWS. Furthermore, the roles of technological, organizational, and environmental factors are validated, except for the relationships between security and work flexibility, as well as management support and work flexibility. Finally, these results provide valuable insights and recommendations for RWS providers, user organizations, and government entities on meeting user needs and expanding the market size.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Heetae, 2024. "The utility of remote work solutions in the post-pandemic era: Exploring the mediating effects of productivity and work flexibility," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001611
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001611
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.