IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v74y2023ics0160791x23000970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative dynamics of design thinking and creativity perspectives in company context

Author

Listed:
  • Georgiev, Georgi V.
  • Georgiev, Danko D.

Abstract

This study is intended to provide in-depth insights into how design thinking and creativity issues are understood and possibly evolve in the course of design discussions in a company context. For that purpose, we use the seminar transcripts of the Design Thinking Research Symposium 12 (DTRS12) dataset “Tech-centred Design Thinking: Perspectives from a Rising Asia,” which are primarily concerned with how Korean companies implement design thinking and what role designers currently play. We employed a novel method of information processing based on constructed dynamic semantic networks to investigate the seminar discussions according to company representatives and company size. We compared the quantitative dynamics in two seminars: the first involved managerial representatives of four companies, and the second involved specialized designers and management of a design center of single company. On the basis of dynamic semantic networks, we quantified the changes in four semantic measures—abstraction, polysemy, information content, and pairwise word similarity—in chronologically reconstructed individual design-thinking processes. Statistical analyses show that design thinking in the seminar with four companies, exhibits significant differences in the dynamics of abstraction, polysemy, and information content, compared to the seminar with the design center of single company. Both the decrease in polysemy and abstraction and the increase in information content in the individual design-thinking processes in the seminar with four companies indicate that design managers are focused on more concrete design issues, with more information and less ambiguous content to the final design product. By contrast, specialized designers manifest more abstract thinking and appear to exhibit a slightly higher level of divergence in their design processes. The results suggest that design thinking and creativity issues are articulated differently depending on designer roles and the company size.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgiev, Georgi V. & Georgiev, Danko D., 2023. "Quantitative dynamics of design thinking and creativity perspectives in company context," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:74:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23000970
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23000970
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Liangqiang & Yang, Liang & Zhao, Meng & Liao, Miyan & Cao, Yunzhong, 2022. "Exploring the success determinants of crowdfunding for cultural and creative projects: An empirical study based on signal theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Geert Hofstede, 1985. "The Interaction Between National And Organizational Value Systems[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 347-357, July.
    3. Selamat, Moch Akbar & Windasari, Nila Armelia, 2021. "Chatbot for SMEs: Integrating customer and business owner perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. David Sánchez & Montserrat Batet, 2012. "A New Model to Compute the Information Content of Concepts from Taxonomic Knowledge," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 8(2), pages 34-50, April.
    5. Spuzic, S. & Narayanan, R. & Abhary, K. & Adriansen, H.K. & Pignata, S. & Uzunovic, F. & Guang, Xu, 2016. "The synergy of creativity and critical thinking in engineering design: The role of interdisciplinary augmentation and the fine arts," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-7.
    6. Chen, Tai-Yueh & Chang, Wei-Chen & Hsieh, Kuo-Jung & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Advancing Taiwan's traditional craft products: A modular product design model of manufacturing technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Cicco, Roberta & Iacobucci, Serena & Cannito, Loreta & Onesti, Gianni & Ceccato, Irene & Palumbo, Riccardo, 2024. "Virtual vs. human influencer: Effects on users’ perceptions and brand outcomes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Hammad S. Alotaibi & Nadine Campbell, 2022. "Organizational Culture towards Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030: Evidence from National Water Company," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Nisreen Ameen & Jyoti Choudrie & Paul Jones & Amitabh Anand, 2022. "Innovative Technologies and Small-Medium Sized Enterprises in Times of Crisis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1055-1060, August.
    5. Michał Bańka & Jakub Daniłowski & Mirosław Czerliński & Jakub Murawski & Renata Żochowska & Aleksander Sobota, 2022. "A Feedback Analysis Automation Using Business Intelligence Technology in Companies Organizing Urban Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Fang, Xing, 2022. "Why we hide good deeds? The selfless and anonymous donation behavior in crowdfunding," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Shin, Jiyoung & Moon, Jon Jungbien & Kang, Jingoo, 2023. "Where does ESG pay? The role of national culture in moderating the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).
    8. Kenji Fujita & Listyoko Wisnu Aji & Win Aung Kyaw, 2009. "Primary Study of Leader and Follower Relationship in Asia: Empirical Study on Managers at AEON in Asian Countries," Working Papers EMS_2009_06, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    9. Laurent Karsenty, 2013. "How to apprehend trust at work? [Comment appréhender la confiance au travail ?]," Post-Print hal-04464235, HAL.
    10. Tang, Xiaobo & Yao, Xingyuan & Dai, Ruyi & Wang, Qian, 2024. "Does green matter for crowdfunding? International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Hsu, Chia-Lin & Chen, Mu-Chen, 2021. "Advocating recycling and encouraging environmentally friendly habits through gamification: An empirical investigation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. Marta Widz & Nadine Kammerlander, 2023. "Entrepreneurial exit intentions in emerging economies: a neoinstitutional perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 615-638, February.
    13. Junjuan Du, 2022. "Project Attribute Information and Initiator’s Commitment in Crowdfunding Message Strategy: An Empirical Investigation of Financing Performance in Agri-Food Crowdfunding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Wen Zhang & Qiang Wang & Jian Li & Zhenzhong Ma & Gokul Bhandari & Rui Peng, 2023. "What makes deceptive online reviews? A linguistic analysis perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Krista B. Lewellyn & Maureen I. Muller-Kahle, 2020. "The Corporate Board Glass Ceiling: The Role of Empowerment and Culture in Shaping Board Gender Diversity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 329-346, August.
    16. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Ciro Troise, 2023. "Live support by chatbots with artificial intelligence: A future research agenda," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    17. Mohsni, Sana & Otchere, Isaac & Shahriar, Saquib, 2021. "Board gender diversity, firm performance and risk-taking in developing countries: The moderating effect of culture," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Venkateswaran, Ramya Tarakad & George, Rejie, 2020. "When does culture matter? A multilevel study on the role of situational moderators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 99-122.
    19. Serwaah, Priscilla & Shneor, Rotem & Nyarko, Samuel Anokye & Nielsen, Kristian Roed, 2024. "Explaining gender differences in crowdfunding contribution intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Alfonso Pellegrino & Masato Abe, 2023. "Leveraging Social Media for SMEs: Findings from a Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:74:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23000970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.