IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v65y2021ics0160791x21000130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing resource-constrained innovation in emerging markets: Perspectives from a business model

Author

Listed:
  • Sharmelly, Rifat
  • Ray, Pradeep Kanta

Abstract

This study examines the organization of resource-constrained innovation from a business model perspective. Using a multiple case study design, we demonstrate that the ability to organize resource-constrained innovation is built on cost, good-enough, frugal, and reverse innovation capabilities. Cost innovation does not always lead to a new product, rather it is a way to reduce operational costs through the value creation activities of a business model to achieve resource-constrained innovation. Good-enough innovations are developed through existing platform reengineering and localization through value creation activities. We demonstrate that frugal innovations are developed based on new product architectures and applications that can create completely new market segments to compete against non-consumption. Reverse innovations refer to frugal innovations that are characterized by higher market novelty because they create completely new market segments in developed and developing markets for value capture.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharmelly, Rifat & Ray, Pradeep Kanta, 2021. "Managing resource-constrained innovation in emerging markets: Perspectives from a business model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:65:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21000130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21000130
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinkovics, Noemi & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Yamin, Mo, 2014. "The role of social value creation in business model formulation at the bottom of the pyramid – Implications for MNEs?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 692-707.
    2. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    3. Paula Linna, 2013. "Bricolage As A Means Of Innovating In A Resource-Scarce Environment: A Study Of Innovator-Entrepreneurs At The Bop," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-23.
    4. Mike Wright & Igor Filatotchev & Robert E. Hoskisson & Mike W. Peng, 2005. "Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 1-33, January.
    5. Ted London & Stuart L Hart, 2004. "Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transnational model," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(5), pages 350-370, September.
    6. Mike W Peng & Denis Y L Wang & Yi Jiang, 2008. "An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(5), pages 920-936, July.
    7. Laura Rienda & Enrique Claver & Diego Quer & Rosario Andreu, 2019. "Family businesses from emerging markets and choice of entry mode abroad: insights from Indian firms," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 6-30, February.
    8. Liliana Doganova & Marie Eyquem-Renault, 2009. "What do business models do? Narratives, calculation and market exploration," Post-Print halshs-00347615, HAL.
    9. Winterhalter, Stephan & Zeschky, Marco B. & Neumann, Lukas & Gassmann, Oliver, 2017. "Business Models for Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Case of the Medical Device and Laboratory Equipment Industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 66, pages 3-13.
    10. Lim, Chaisung & Fujimoto, Takahiro, 2019. "Frugal innovation and design changes expanding the cost-performance frontier: A Schumpeterian approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1016-1029.
    11. Hossain, Mokter & Simula, Henri & Halme, Minna, 2016. "Can frugal go global? Diffusion patterns of frugal innovations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 132-139.
    12. Doganova, Liliana & Eyquem-Renault, Marie, 2009. "What do business models do?: Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1559-1570, December.
    13. Beattie, Vivien & Smith, Sarah Jane, 2013. "Value creation and business models: Refocusing the intellectual capital debate," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 243-254.
    14. Balkrishna Rao, 2014. "Alleviating Poverty in the Twenty-First Century Through Frugal Innovations," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 40-59.
    15. Shuan SadreGhazi & Geert Duysters, 2009. "Serving Low-Income Markets: Rethinking Multinational Corporations’ Strategies," Chapters, in: Wilfred Dolfsma & Geert Duysters & Ionara Costa (ed.), Multinationals and Emerging Economies, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. ., 2010. "Biopharmaceutical Company Business Models," Chapters, in: Innovation and Commercialisation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Morris, Michael & Schindehutte, Minet & Allen, Jeffrey, 2005. "The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 726-735, June.
    18. Cantwell, John, 1995. "The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(1), pages 155-174, February.
    19. Rao, Balkrishna C., 2013. "How disruptive is frugal?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 65-73.
    20. Minna Halme & Sara Lindeman & Paula Linna, 2012. "Innovation for Inclusive Business: Intrapreneurial Bricolage in Multinational Corporations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 743-784, June.
    21. Tiwari, Rajnish & Kalogerakis, Katharina & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2014. "Frugal innovation and analogies: Some propositions for product development in emerging economies," Working Papers 84, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    22. Wan, Feng & Williamson, Peter & Yin, Eden, 2019. "Enabling cost innovation by non-traditional organizational processes: The case of Chinese firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 352-361.
    23. Verdiana Giannetti & Gaia Rubera, 2020. "Innovation for and from emerging countries: a closer look at the antecedents of trickle-down and reverse innovation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 987-1008, September.
    24. Zhenfeng Liu & Jian Feng & Jinfeng Wang, 2020. "Resource-Constrained Innovation Method for Sustainability: Application of Morphological Analysis and TRIZ Inventive Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    25. Marine Hadengue & Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Thierry Warin, 2017. "Reverse innovation: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 142-182, April.
    26. Bhasker Mukerji & Bharat Maheshwari & Uma Kumar & Vinod Kumar, 2010. "Open source software: emerging business models," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 319-339.
    27. Joan Enric Ricart & Michael J Enright & Pankaj Ghemawat & Stuart L Hart & Tarun Khanna, 2004. "New frontiers in international strategy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(3), pages 175-200, May.
    28. Rajnish Tiwari & Luise Fischer & Katharina Kalogerakis, 2017. "Frugal Innovation: An Assessment of Scholarly Discourse, Trends and Potential Societal Implications," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Cornelius Herstatt & Rajnish Tiwari (ed.), Lead Market India, pages 13-35, Springer.
    29. Howell, Rachel & van Beers, Cees & Doorn, Neelke, 2018. "Value capture and value creation: The role of information technology in business models for frugal innovations in Africa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 227-239.
    30. Zhu, Fengxia & Zou, Shaoming & Xu, Hui, 2017. "Launching reverse-innovated product from emerging markets to MNC’s home market: A theoretical framework for MNC’s decisions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 156-163.
    31. Vernon, Raymond, 1979. "The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 41(4), pages 255-267, November.
    32. Venkatesh Shankar & Unnati Narang, 2020. "Emerging market innovations: unique and differential drivers, practitioner implications, and research agenda," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1030-1052, September.
    33. Herstatt, Cornelius & Tiwari, Rajnish, 2020. "Opportunities of frugality in the post-Corona era," Working Papers 110, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    34. ., 2010. "Case Studies in Biopharmaceutical Business Models," Chapters, in: Innovation and Commercialisation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Xuecheng & Qaisar Iqbal, 2022. "Ethical Leadership, Bricolage, and Eco-Innovation in the Chinese Manufacturing Industry: A Multi-Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Huda Khan & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Richard Lee & Gary Knight & Nazim Hussain, 2024. "Breaking Barriers: How Do the Marketing Capabilities of Emerging-Market Micro-Multinationals Drive Social Innovation?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 701-726, August.
    3. Willoughby, Kelvin W. & Mullina, Nadezhda, 2021. "Reverse innovation, international patenting and economic inertia: Constraints to appropriating the benefits of technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Jun Wen & Lingxiao Li & Xinxin Zhao & Chenyang Jiao & Wenjie Li, 2022. "How Government Size Expansion Can Affect Green Innovation—An Empirical Analysis of Data on Cross-Country Green Patent Filings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Xiang, Guopeng & Peng, Mixiang & Tang, Fei & Liu, Yuan, 2024. "Unpacking the impact of entrepreneurial learning on business model innovation in internet startups: Mediating roles of digital capabilities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Adegoke Oke & Anand Nair, 2023. "From chaos to creation: The mutual causality between supply chain disruption and innovation in low‐income markets," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(3), pages 20-41, July.
    7. Shah, Sayed Kifayat & Zhongjun, Tang, 2021. "Elaborating on the consumer’s intention–behavior gap regarding 5G technology: The moderating role of the product market-creation ability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Malobi Mukherjee & Jacob Wood, 2021. "Consolidating Unorganised Retail Businesses through Digital Platforms: Implications for Achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    2. Hossain, Mokter, 2021. "Frugal innovation: Unveiling the uncomfortable reality," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Winterhalter, Stephan & Zeschky, Marco B. & Neumann, Lukas & Gassmann, Oliver, 2017. "Business Models for Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Case of the Medical Device and Laboratory Equipment Industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 66, pages 3-13.
    4. Chakravarty, Sanghamitra, 2022. "Resource constrained innovation in a technology intensive sector: Frugal medical devices from manufacturing firms in South Africa," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Gasparin, Marta & Green, William & Lilley, Simon & Quinn, Martin & Saren, Mike & Schinckus, Christophe, 2021. "Business as unusual: A business model for social innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 698-709.
    6. Hossain, Mokter & Park, Sukyung & Shahid, Subhan, 2023. "Frugal innovation for sustainable rural development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele & Peprah, Augustine Awuah & Amartey, Abednego Okoe & Rajwani, Tazeeb, 2020. "Institutional voids and firms' resource commitment in emerging markets: A review and future research agenda," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    8. Onsongo, Elsie K. & Knorringa, Peter & van Beers, Cees, 2023. "Frugal business model innovation in the Base of the Pyramid: The case of Philips Community Life Centres in Africa," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    9. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Value creation using minimal resources – A meta-synthesis of frugal innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Suresh Malodia & Shaphali Gupta & Anand Kumar Jaiswal, 2020. "Reverse innovation: a conceptual framework," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1009-1029, September.
    11. Hossain, Mokter, 2021. "Frugal innovation and sustainable business models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Adomako, Samuel & Medase, Stephen Kehinde & Zhang, Stephen X., 2024. "How and when adversity breeds ingenuity in an emerging market: Environmental threats, co-innovation, and frugal innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    13. Zhenfeng Liu & Jian Feng & Jinfeng Wang, 2020. "Resource-Constrained Innovation Method for Sustainability: Application of Morphological Analysis and TRIZ Inventive Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Ahmed, Tanvir & D'Souza, Clare & Ahmed, Rafiuddin & Nanere, Marthin & Khashru, Amir, 2021. "Unpacking microlevel social-purpose organisation in a less affluent economy: The cases of type 2 social business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 621-629.
    15. Mbalyohere, Charles & Lawton, Thomas & Boojihawon, Roshan & Viney, Howard, 2017. "Corporate political activity and location-based advantage: MNE responses to institutional transformation in Uganda’s electricity industry," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 743-759.
    16. Havemo, Emelie, 2018. "A visual perspective on value creation: Exploring patterns in business model diagrams," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 441-452.
    17. Tassilo Schuster & Dirk Holtbrügge, 2014. "Benefits of Cross‐sector Partnerships in Markets at the Base of the Pyramid," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 188-203, March.
    18. Rossetto, Dennys Eduardo & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Bernardes, Roberto Carlos & Frankwick, Gary L., 2023. "Measuring frugal innovation capabilities: An initial scale proposition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    19. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Doing more with less - How frugal innovations can contribute to improving healthcare systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    20. Raphaël Maucuer & Alexandre Renaud, 2019. "Business Model Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Origins and Trends," Post-Print hal-01918188, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:65:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21000130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.