IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v121y2023ics0166497222002255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring frugal innovation capabilities: An initial scale proposition

Author

Listed:
  • Rossetto, Dennys Eduardo
  • Borini, Felipe Mendes
  • Bernardes, Roberto Carlos
  • Frankwick, Gary L.

Abstract

This paper proposes an initial scale to measure the frugal innovation capabilities within organizations. Our scale comprises three major dimensions: (1) focus on core functionalities, (2) substantial cost reduction, and (3) shared sustainable engagement. We adopted the frugal innovation efficiency-driven perspective based on both the resource-based and the capability-based views. From primary survey data of 1,097 companies in three countries (Brazil, India, and the USA), we developed a reliable and valid scale to measure frugal innovation capabilities comprising ten features with clear psychometric properties. We also contribute to the innovation research literature by revisiting its main texts and proposing a concept of frugal innovation capabilities. In doing so, we introduce an initial measuring instrument. Such an initiative represents an advance in the literature to better understand the development of frugal innovation, guiding the exploration of frugality-based advantages. It enables managers to identify the organizational capabilities that are needed to increase the odds of developing frugal innovations. This is a first attempt to measure the concept of frugal innovation capabilities. There is much room for the exploration of its other dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossetto, Dennys Eduardo & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Bernardes, Roberto Carlos & Frankwick, Gary L., 2023. "Measuring frugal innovation capabilities: An initial scale proposition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:121:y:2023:i:c:s0166497222002255
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497222002255
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hossain, Mokter & Simula, Henri & Halme, Minna, 2016. "Can frugal go global? Diffusion patterns of frugal innovations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 132-139.
    2. Rao, Balkrishna C., 2013. "How disruptive is frugal?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 65-73.
    3. Tiwari, Rajnish & Kalogerakis, Katharina & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2014. "Frugal innovation and analogies: Some propositions for product development in emerging economies," Working Papers 84, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    4. Peter Knorringa & Iva Peša & André Leliveld & Cees van Beers, 2016. "Frugal Innovation and Development: Aides or Adversaries?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(2), pages 143-153, April.
    5. Winterhalter, Stephan & Zeschky, Marco B. & Neumann, Lukas & Gassmann, Oliver, 2017. "Business Models for Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Case of the Medical Device and Laboratory Equipment Industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 66, pages 3-13.
    6. Corlane Barclay, 2014. "Using Frugal Innovations to Support Cybercrime Legislations in Small Developing States: Introducing the Cyber-Legislation Development and Implementation Process Model (CyberLeg-DPM)," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 165-195, April.
    7. Christian Le Bas, 2016. "Frugal innovation, sustainable innovation, reverse innovation: why do they look alike? Why are they different?," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 9-26.
    8. Hossain, Mokter, 2017. "Mapping the frugal innovation phenomenon," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 199-208.
    9. Figueiredo, Paulo N., 2002. "Does technological learning pay off? Inter-firm differences in technological capability-accumulation paths and operational performance improvement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 73-94, January.
    10. Hossain, Mokter, 2018. "Grassroots innovation: The state of the art and future perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 63-69.
    11. Rakhshanda Khan, 2016. "How Frugal Innovation Promotes Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-29, October.
    12. Baskaran, Shruthi & Mehta, Khanjan, 2016. "What is innovation anyway? Youth perspectives from resource-constrained environments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 52, pages 4-17.
    13. Mario Pansera, 2013. "Frugality, Grassroots and Inclusiveness: New Challenges for Mainstream Innovation Theories," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(6), pages 469-478, August.
    14. Jaques Angot & Loïc Plé, 2015. "Serving poor people in rich countries: the bottom-of-the-pyramid business model solution," Post-Print hal-01563022, HAL.
    15. Anil Nair & Orhun Guldiken & Stav Fainshmidt & Amir Pezeshkan, 2015. "Innovation in India: A review of past research and future directions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 925-958, December.
    16. Bianchi, Carlos & Bianco, Mariela & Ardanche, Melissa & Schenck, Marcela, 2017. "Healthcare frugal innovation: A solving problem rationale under scarcity conditions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 74-80.
    17. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2012. "Open global innovation networks as enablers of frugal innovation: propositions based on evidence from India," Working Papers 72, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    18. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2003. "The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 997-1010, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel Gomes Moreira & Robério José Rogério dos Santos & Victor Diogho Heuer de Carvalho & Francisco José Peixoto Rosário & Agnaldo José dos Santos, 2024. "Potential for Frugal Innovation in a Brazilian Regional System: A Study Based on a Multicriteria Approach," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Zhe Zhang & Hongyan Liu & Yunhui Zhao, 2024. "How Enterprises Achieve Frugal Innovation: A Configurational Study Based on the Model of Organizational Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Josephat D. Sengura & Mu Renyan, 2024. "The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Entrepreneurial Bricolage on Frugal Innovation and SMEs Sustainable Performance in Emerging Markets," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 19-37, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hossain, Mokter, 2021. "Frugal innovation: Unveiling the uncomfortable reality," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Doing more with less - How frugal innovations can contribute to improving healthcare systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    3. Hossain, Mokter & Park, Sukyung & Shahid, Subhan, 2023. "Frugal innovation for sustainable rural development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Hossain, Mokter, 2017. "Mapping the frugal innovation phenomenon," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 199-208.
    5. Chakravarty, Sanghamitra, 2022. "Resource constrained innovation in a technology intensive sector: Frugal medical devices from manufacturing firms in South Africa," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Zhenfeng Liu & Jian Feng & Jinfeng Wang, 2020. "Resource-Constrained Innovation Method for Sustainability: Application of Morphological Analysis and TRIZ Inventive Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Hossain, Mokter, 2021. "Frugal innovation and sustainable business models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Dabić, Marina & Obradović, Tena & Vlačić, Božidar & Sahasranamam, Sreevas & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Frugal innovations: A multidisciplinary review & agenda for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 914-929.
    9. Octaviano Rojas Luiz & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Hermes Moretti Ribeiro da Silva, 2021. "Pro-Poor Innovations to Promote Instrumental Freedoms: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Onsongo, Elsie K. & Knorringa, Peter & van Beers, Cees, 2023. "Frugal business model innovation in the Base of the Pyramid: The case of Philips Community Life Centres in Africa," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Hong Tian & Ao Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, and Frugal Innovation: The Moderating Role of Organizational Innovation Climate," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    12. Achtelik, Timo & Herstatt, Cornelius & Tiwari, Rajnish, 2022. "Frugal sustainability: A new perspective to foster corporate sustainability," Working Papers 112, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management, revised 2022.
    13. Sharmelly, Rifat & Ray, Pradeep Kanta, 2021. "Managing resource-constrained innovation in emerging markets: Perspectives from a business model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Sanghamitra Chakravarty & Georgina Mercedes Gómez, 2024. "A Development Lens to Frugal Innovation: Bringing Back Production and Technological Capabilities into the Discourse," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(1), pages 82-101, February.
    15. Bridget Chipanje & Dong Ying & Lv Haiping, 2021. "Performance analysis of Reverse and Frugal Innovations in Nigeria A Case Study of IVM automobile company," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 591-625, September.
    16. Sharma, Gautam & Dahlstrand, Åsa Lindholm, 2023. "Innovations, informality, and the global south: A thematic analysis of past research and future directions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Value creation using minimal resources – A meta-synthesis of frugal innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    18. Binod Khadria & Ratnam Mishra, 2023. "Technological Transformation and the Role of Frugal Innovations in Entrepreneurship Development in India," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(2_suppl), pages 27-46, November.
    19. Wairokpam Premi Devi & Hemant Kumar, 2018. "Frugal Innovations and Actor–Network Theory: A Case of Bamboo Shoots Processing in Manipur, India," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(1), pages 66-83, January.
    20. Bianchi, Carlos & Bianco, Mariela & Ardanche, Melissa & Schenck, Marcela, 2017. "Healthcare frugal innovation: A solving problem rationale under scarcity conditions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 74-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:121:y:2023:i:c:s0166497222002255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.