IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v39y2014icp55-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Glamorizing rampage online: School shooting fan communities on YouTube

Author

Listed:
  • Oksanen, Atte
  • Hawdon, James
  • Räsänen, Pekka

Abstract

This article examines a YouTube school shooting fan network. We analyze the network dynamics, potential efficacy and influence of this network. Our main task is to discover if school shooting fans form a small-world network and to study the social psychological characteristics of the group's formation and cohesion. Our theoretical approach draws from social network theory, group theory and subcultural theory. The data were collected from YouTube during April 2012. The network still existed in 2014, which shows that it continues to be potentially influential since it is easy to detect and hard to eliminate. Initially, profiles with references to school shootings were searched for by using various keywords related to school shootings. Only those profiles that included positive or sympathizing comments on school shootings were selected for further analysis. A total of 113 pro-school shooting profiles were identified, and 100 out these profiles belonged to the same social network, which resembles a small-world network. Our thematic analysis reveals that Columbine-shooting fans form the core group of the network, with the Columbine murders being a uniting factor among the fans. The results indicate that social networking sites provide a powerful arena for users interested in morally dubious material to find other similarly minded people globally. School shooting fans share a common language and they express similar ideological points of view and justifications for the mass violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksanen, Atte & Hawdon, James & Räsänen, Pekka, 2014. "Glamorizing rampage online: School shooting fan communities on YouTube," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 55-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:55-67
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X1400044X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Näsi, Matti & Räsänen, Pekka & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2011. "Identification with online and offline communities: Understanding ICT disparities in Finland," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 4-11.
    2. Lynn Cherny, 1999. "Conversation and Community : Chat in a Virtual World," Post-Print hal-02297990, HAL.
    3. Mike Thelwall & Pardeep Sud & Farida Vis, 2012. "Commenting on YouTube videos: From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(3), pages 616-629, March.
    4. Hsinchun Chen & Wingyan Chung & Jialun Qin & Edna Reid & Marc Sageman & Gabriel Weimann, 2008. "Uncovering the dark Web: A case study of Jihad on the Web," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(8), pages 1347-1359, June.
    5. Tianjun Fu & Ahmed Abbasi & Hsinchun Chen, 2010. "A focused crawler for Dark Web forums," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(6), pages 1213-1231, June.
    6. Patacchini, Eleonora & Zenou, Yves, 2008. "The strength of weak ties in crime," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 209-236, February.
    7. Cassar, Alessandra, 2007. "Coordination and cooperation in local, random and small world networks: Experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 209-230, February.
    8. Tianjun Fu & Ahmed Abbasi & Hsinchun Chen, 2010. "A focused crawler for Dark Web forums," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(6), pages 1213-1231, June.
    9. Mike Thelwall & Pardeep Sud & Farida Vis, 2012. "Commenting on YouTube videos: From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(3), pages 616-629, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Karpova & Aleksei Savelev & Nataliya Maksimova, 2021. "Modeling the Process of School Shooters Radicalization (Russian Case)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Buhmann, Alexander & Maltseva, Kateryna & Fieseler, Christian & Fleck, Matthes, 2021. "Muzzling social media: The adverse effects of moderating stakeholder conversations online," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julie Beugnot & Bernard Fortin & Guy Lacroix & Marie Claire Villeval, 2013. "Social Networks and Peer Effects at Work," Cahiers de recherche 1320, CIRPEE.
    2. Mike Thelwall & David Foster, 2021. "Male or female gender‐polarized YouTube videos are less viewed," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(12), pages 1545-1557, December.
    3. Beugnot, Julie & Fortin, Bernard & Lacroix, Guy & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2019. "Gender and peer effects on performance in social networks," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 207-224.
    4. Beugnot, Julie & Fortin, Bernard & Lacroix, Guy & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2017. "Gender and Peer Effects in Social Networks," IZA Discussion Papers 10588, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Yaquan Dou & Changhao Wu & Youjun He, 2023. "Public Concern and Awareness of National Parks in China: Evidence from Social Media Big Data and Questionnaire Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Francesca Negri, 2015. "User-generated video parodies in social media," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 75-95.
    7. Boucher, Vincent & Fortin, Bernard, 2015. "Some Challenges in the Empirics of the Effects of Networks," IZA Discussion Papers 8896, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Sandra González-Bailón & Georgios Paltoglou, 2015. "Signals of Public Opinion in Online Communication," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 659(1), pages 95-107, May.
    9. Weiai Wayne Xu & Ji-young Park & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Longitudinal dynamics of the cultural diffusion of Kpop on YouTube," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1859-1875, July.
    10. Thommes, Kirsten & Vyrastekova, Jana & Akkerman, Agnes, 2015. "Behavioral spillovers from freeriding in multilevel interactions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 78-87.
    11. Gary Charness & Francesco Feri & Miguel A. Meléndez-Jiménez & Matthias Sutter, 2023. "An Experimental Study on the Effects of Communication, Credibility, and Clustering in Network Games," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(6), pages 1530-1543, November.
    12. Zhang, Liming & Li, Haihong & Dai, Qionglin & Yang, Junzhong, 2022. "Migration based on environment comparison promotes cooperation in evolutionary games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 595(C).
    13. Liu, Xiaodong & Patacchini, Eleonora & Zenou, Yves & Lee, Lung-Fei, 2011. "Criminal Networks: Who is the Key Player?," Research Papers in Economics 2011:7, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
    14. Kovarik, J. & Mengel, F. & Romero, J.G., 2009. "(Anti-) coordination in networks," Research Memorandum 041, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    15. Díaz, Carlos & Patacchini, Eleonora & Verdier, Thierry & Zenou, Yves, 2021. "Leaders in juvenile crime," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 638-667.
    16. Choi, Syngjoo & Gale, Douglas & Kariv, Shachar & Palfrey, Thomas, 2011. "Network architecture, salience and coordination," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 76-90, September.
    17. Liwen Chen & Bobby Chung & Guanghua Wang, 2022. "Stay-at-Home Peer Mothers and Gender Norms: Short-run Effects on Educational Outcomes," Working Papers 2022-039, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    18. Chih‐Sheng Hsieh & Lung‐Fei Lee & Vincent Boucher, 2020. "Specification and estimation of network formation and network interaction models with the exponential probability distribution," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 1349-1390, November.
    19. P. Jean-Jacques Herings & Ana Mauleon & Vincent Vannetelbosch, 2021. "Horizon- K Farsightedness in Criminal Networks," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, July.
    20. Takahiro Ezaki & Naoki Masuda, 2017. "Reinforcement learning account of network reciprocity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:55-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.