IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v129y2024ics016649722300192x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can technology assessment tools support sustainable innovation? A systematic literature review and synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Parolin, Giácomo
  • McAloone, Tim C.
  • Pigosso, Daniela C.A.

Abstract

Sustainability considerations are increasingly important for manufacturing companies seeking to develop products that meet the needs of society and the environment. The way technologies are assessed in the early design stages plays a crucial role in the integration of sustainability into innovation activities – a necessary step towards the development of products and processes with better environmental and social consequences. However, existing sustainability assessment tools are difficult to deploy in the highly uncertain and data-scarce front-end of innovation. In order to ascertain the efficacy of technology assessment methods, a systematic literature review was conducted to systematize best practices in technology assessment and establish a set of design propositions to improve early-stage sustainability assessment. Subsequently, recommendations for designing and effectively implementing sustainability assessment tools in technology development were elicited. Several avenues for future research are proposed, including the testing and refinement of the design propositions and how to operationalize early-stage sustainability assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Parolin, Giácomo & McAloone, Tim C. & Pigosso, Daniela C.A., 2024. "How can technology assessment tools support sustainable innovation? A systematic literature review and synthesis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s016649722300192x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016649722300192X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daim, Tugrul U. & Yoon, Byung-Sung & Lindenberg, John & Grizzi, Robert & Estep, Judith & Oliver, Terry, 2018. "Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 49-66.
    2. Mariia Kravchenko & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Tim C. McAloone, 2020. "A Trade-Off Navigation Framework as a Decision Support for Conflicting Sustainability Indicators within Circular Economy Implementation in the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Daniel R. Cooper & Timothy G. Gutowski, 2020. "Prospective Environmental Analyses of Emerging Technology: A Critique, a Proposed Methodology, and a Case Study on Incremental Sheet Forming," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(1), pages 38-51, February.
    4. Eapen, Deepa Elizabeth & Suresh, Resmi & Patil, Sairaj & Rengaswamy, Raghunathan, 2021. "A systems engineering perspective on electrochemical energy technologies and a framework for application driven choice of technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Franco, L. Alberto & Montibeller, Gilberto, 2010. "Facilitated modelling in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 489-500, September.
    6. Shui Ming Li & Felix T. S. Chan & Yung Po Tsang & Hoi Yan Lam, 2021. "New Product Idea Selection in the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation: A Fuzzy Best-Worst Method and Group Decision-Making Process," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Dewulf, Jo & Van Langenhove, Herman, 2005. "Integrating industrial ecology principles into a set of environmental sustainability indicators for technology assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 419-432.
    8. Li, Li & Lu, Yonglong & Shi, Yajuan & Wang, Tieyu & Luo, Wei & Gosens, Jorrit & Chen, Peng & Li, Haiqian, 2013. "Integrated technology selection for energy conservation and PAHs control in iron and steel industry: Methodology and case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 194-203.
    9. Kurt Gaubinger & Michael Rabl, 2014. "Structuring the Front End of Innovation," Springer Books, in: Oliver Gassmann & Fiona Schweitzer (ed.), Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation, edition 127, pages 15-30, Springer.
    10. Laforest, Valérie, 2014. "Assessment of emerging and innovative techniques considering best available technique performances," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 11-24.
    11. Nils Thonemann & Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga, 2020. "How to Conduct Prospective Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies? A Systematic Review and Methodological Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Sala, Serenella & Ciuffo, Biagio & Nijkamp, Peter, 2015. "A systemic framework for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-325.
    13. Schjaer-Jacobsen, Hans, 1996. "A new method for evaluating worst- and best-case (WBC) economic consequences of technological development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 241-250, December.
    14. Radpour, Saeidreza & Gemechu, Eskinder & Ahiduzzaman, Md & Kumar, Amit, 2021. "Development of a framework for the assessment of the market penetration of novel in situ bitumen extraction technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Lizarralde, Rafael & Ganzarain, Jaione & Zubizarreta, Mikel, 2022. "Adaptation of the MIVES method for the strategic selection of new technologies at an R&D centre. Focus on the manufacturing sector," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    17. Katarzyna Halicka, 2020. "Technology Selection Using the TOPSIS Method," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 85-96.
    18. Tang, Yong & Sun, Honghang & Yao, Qiang & Wang, Yibo, 2014. "The selection of key technologies by the silicon photovoltaic industry based on the Delphi method and AHP (analytic hierarchy process): Case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 474-482.
    19. Reza Fazeli & Vitor Leal & Jorge P. Sousa, 2011. "A multi-criteria evaluation framework for alternative light-duty vehicles technologies," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 230-251.
    20. Mariia Kravchenko & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Tim C. McAloone, 2020. "A Procedure to Support Systematic Selection of Leading Indicators for Sustainability Performance Measurement of Circular Economy Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, January.
    21. Xiaoning Hu & Meizi Si & Han Luo & Mancai Guo & Jijun Wang, 2019. "The Method and Model of Ecological Technology Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    22. Agbor, Ezinwa & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 433-449.
    23. Charles R. Weisbin & Guillermo Rodriguez & Alberto Elfes & Jeffrey H. Smith, 2004. "Toward a systematic approach for selection of NASA technology portfolios," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 285-302.
    24. Tavana, Madjid & Mina, Hassan & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J., 2023. "A general Best-Worst method considering interdependency with application to innovation and technology assessment at NASA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    25. Yen-Chun Lee & C. James Chou, 2016. "Technology Evaluation and Selection of 3DIC Integration Using a Three-Stage Fuzzy MCDM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, January.
    26. Ilaria Barletta & Jon Larborn & Mahesh Mani & Björn Johannson, 2016. "Towards an Assessment Methodology to Support Decision Making for Sustainable Electronic Waste Management Systems: Automatic Sorting Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    27. Joule A. Bergerson & Adam Brandt & Joe Cresko & Michael Carbajales‐Dale & Heather L. MacLean & H. Scott Matthews & Sean McCoy & Marcelle McManus & Shelie A. Miller & William R. Morrow & I. Daniel Pose, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(1), pages 11-25, February.
    28. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    29. Si, Tong & Wang, Chunbo & Liu, Ruiqi & Guo, Yusheng & Yue, Shuang & Ren, Yujie, 2020. "Multi-criteria comprehensive energy efficiency assessment based on fuzzy-AHP method: A case study of post-treatment technologies for coal-fired units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    30. Kerr, Clive & Farrukh, Clare & Phaal, Robert & Probert, David, 2013. "Key principles for developing industrially relevant strategic technology management toolkits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(6), pages 1050-1070.
    31. Parisa Rafiaani & Zoumpolia Dikopoulou & Miet Dael & Tom Kuppens & Hossein Azadi & Philippe Lebailly & Steven Passel, 2020. "Identifying Social Indicators for Sustainability Assessment of CCU Technologies: A Modified Multi-criteria Decision Making," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 15-44, January.
    32. Guo, Jianfeng & Pan, Jiaofeng & Guo, Jianxin & Gu, Fu & Kuusisto, Jari, 2019. "Measurement framework for assessing disruptive innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 250-265.
    33. Kathrin Bienert & Britt Schumacher & Martín Rojas Arboleda & Eric Billig & Samiksha Shakya & Gustav Rogstrand & Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski, 2019. "Multi-Indicator Assessment of Innovative Small-Scale Biomethane Technologies in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, April.
    34. Vik, Jostein & Melås, Anders Mahlum & Stræte, Egil Petter & Søraa, Roger Andre, 2021. "Balanced readiness level assessment (BRLa): A tool for exploring new and emerging technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    35. Farrukh, Clare & Holgado, Maria, 2020. "Integrating sustainable value thinking into technology forecasting: A configurable toolset for early stage technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Rennings & Philipp Baaden & Carolin Block & Marcus John & Stefanie Bröring, 2024. "Assessing emerging sustainability-oriented technologies: the case of precision agriculture," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 2969-2998, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Halicka, 2020. "Technology Selection Using the TOPSIS Method," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 85-96.
    2. Deidre Wolff & Svenja Weber & Tobias Graumann & Stefan Zebrowski & Nils Mainusch & Nikolas Dilger & Felipe Cerdas & Sabrina Zellmer, 2023. "An Environmental and Technical Evaluation of Vacuum-Based Thin Film Technologies: Lithium Niobate Coated Cathode Active Material for Use in All-Solid-State Battery Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Paul Baustert & Elorri Igos & Thomas Schaubroeck & Laurent Chion & Angelica Mendoza Beltran & Elke Stehfest & Detlef van Vuuren & Hester Biemans & Enrico Benetto, 2022. "Integration of future water scarcity and electricity supply into prospective LCA: Application to the assessment of water desalination for the steel industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1182-1194, August.
    4. Mitchell K. van der Hulst & Mark A. J. Huijbregts & Niels van Loon & Mirjam Theelen & Lucinda Kootstra & Joseph D. Bergesen & Mara Hauck, 2020. "A systematic approach to assess the environmental impact of emerging technologies: A case study for the GHG footprint of CIGS solar photovoltaic laminate," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1234-1249, December.
    5. Carlos Serrano-Cinca & Yolanda Fuertes-Callén & Beatriz Cuellar-Fernández, 2021. "Managing for Stakeholders Using Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 581-601, September.
    6. Park, Hyunkyu & Phaal, Rob & Ho, Jae-Yun & O'Sullivan, Eoin, 2020. "Twenty years of technology and strategic roadmapping research: A school of thought perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Kayabay, Kerem & Gökalp, Mert Onuralp & Gökalp, Ebru & Erhan Eren, P. & Koçyiğit, Altan, 2022. "Data science roadmapping: An architectural framework for facilitating transformation towards a data-driven organization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Erik Roos Lindgreen & Katelin Opferkuch & Anna M. Walker & Roberta Salomone & Tatiana Reyes & Andrea Raggi & Alberto Simboli & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Sandra Caeiro, 2022. "Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1414-1438, May.
    9. Lisa Kraus & Heike Proff, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Transportation Criteria and Measurement—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Bana e Costa, Carlos A. & Oliveira, Mónica D. & Vieira, Ana C.L. & Freitas, Liliana & Rodrigues, Teresa C. & Bana e Costa, João & Freitas, Ângela & Santana, Paula, 2023. "Collaborative development of composite indices from qualitative value judgements: The EURO-HEALTHY Population Health Index model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 475-492.
    11. Olga Bogdanov & Veljko Jeremiæ & Sandra Jednak & Mladen Èudanov, 2019. "Scrutinizing the Smart City Index: a multivariate statistical approach," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 777-799.
    12. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Khannoussi, Arwa & Meyer, Patrick & Chaubet, Aurore, 2023. "A multi-criteria decision aiding approach for upgrading public sewerage systems and its application to the city of Brest," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    14. Mariateresa Ciommi & Chiara Gigliarano & Francesco M. Chelli & Mauro Gallegati, 2022. "It is the Total that Does [Not] Make the Sum: Nature, Economy and Society in the Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being of the Italian Provinces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 491-522, June.
    15. Qian, Jiaxin & Wu, Jiahui & Yao, Lei & Mahmut, Saniye & Zhang, Qiang, 2021. "Comprehensive performance evaluation of Wind-Solar-CCHP system based on emergy analysis and multi-objective decision method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Hu, Xueyue & Wang, Chunying & Elshkaki, Ayman, 2024. "Material-energy Nexus: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Zhang, Yi & Huang, Ying & Porter, Alan L. & Zhang, Guangquan & Lu, Jie, 2019. "Discovering and forecasting interactions in big data research: A learning-enhanced bibliometric study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 795-807.
    18. Rajko Tomaš, 2022. "Measurement of the Concentration of Potential Quality of Life in Local Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 79-109, August.
    19. Rizkiana Sidqiyatul Hamdani & Sudharto Prawata Hadi & Iwan Rudiarto, 2021. "Progress or Regress? A Systematic Review on Two Decades of Monitoring and Addressing Land Subsidence Hazards in Semarang City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    20. Boglárka Anna Éliás & Attila Jámbor, 2021. "Food Security and COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the First-Year Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s016649722300192x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.