IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v29y2013i1p63-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing as transcending: An ethnography

Author

Listed:
  • Griesbach, David
  • Grand, Simon

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to better understand how management influences organizational becoming. We suggest an alternative conceptualization based on the strong process view. Management is regarded as a process of enactment. Past and future situations are immanent in situations of the present, in the form of experiences and expectations. In turn, each present situation has an impact beyond the situation only. Through enactments, the situation is transcended, thereby influencing temporally and spatially dispersed situations. By mobilizing specific experiences of the past and expectations about the future, management judges and justifies current issues. In this process, management influences the transcendence of the actual situation, potentially influencing organizational becoming in the future. Our case study of a Swiss textile company reveals several modes of how management creates such potentialities for future enactments.

Suggested Citation

  • Griesbach, David & Grand, Simon, 2013. "Managing as transcending: An ethnography," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 63-77.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:29:y:2013:i:1:p:63-77
    DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522112001388
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haridimos Tsoukas & Robert Chia, 2002. "On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 567-582, October.
    2. Stefan Tengblad, 2006. "Is there a ‘New Managerial Work’? A Comparison with Henry Mintzberg's Classic Study 30 Years Later," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1437-1461, November.
    3. Hernes, Tor & Weik, Elke, 2007. "Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 251-264, September.
    4. Gerry Johnson & Leif Melin & Richard Whittington, 2003. "Micro Strategy and Strategizing: Towards an Activity‐Based View," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 3-22, January.
    5. Henry Mintzberg, 1971. "Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 97-110, October.
    6. Hugh Willmott, 1987. "Studying Managerial Work: A Critique And A Proposal[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 249-270, May.
    7. Marlei Pozzebon, 2004. "The Influence of a Structurationist View on Strategic Management Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 247-272, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kociatkiewicz, Jerzy & Kostera, Monika, 2018. "After retrotopia? The future of organizing and the thought of Zygmunt Bauman," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 335-342.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patriotta, Gerardo & Spedale, Simona, 2011. "Micro-interaction dynamics in group decision making: Face games, interaction order and boundary work," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 362-374.
    2. Vesa, Mikko & Franck, Henrika, 2013. "Bringing strategy to time, studying strategy as experiential vectors," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 23-34.
    3. Erastus Karanja & Mark A. Rosso, 2017. "The Chief Risk Officer: a study of roles and responsibilities," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 103-130, May.
    4. Serghei Floricel & Sorin Piperca & Richard Tee, 2018. "Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, May.
    5. Raelin, Joseph A., 2012. "The manager as facilitator of dialogue," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(6), pages 818-839.
    6. Ericson, Mona, 2014. "On the dynamics of fluidity and open-endedness of strategy process toward a strategy-as-practicing conceptualization," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-15.
    7. Burt, George & Mackay, David J. & van der Heijden, Kees & Verheijdt, Charlotte, 2017. "Openness disposition: Readiness characteristics that influence participant benefits from scenario planning as strategic conversation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 16-25.
    8. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.
    9. Gary T. Burke & Carola Wolf, 2021. "The Process Affordances of Strategy Toolmaking when Addressing Wicked Problems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 359-388, March.
    10. Danuta DiskienÄ— & Virginijus TamaÅ¡eviÄ ius & AgnÄ— KalvaitytÄ—, 2018. "MANAGERIAL ROLES IN SMEs AND THEIR EFFECT ON PERCEIVED MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS IN LITHUANIA," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(1).
    11. Heracleous, Loizos & Klaering, Laura Alexa, 2017. "The circle of life: Rhetoric of identification in Steve Jobs' Stanford speech," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 31-40.
    12. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    13. Marina Fiedler & Isabell Welpe & Arnold Picot, 2010. "Understanding Radical Change: An Examination of Management Departments in German-speaking Universities," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 21(2), pages 111-134.
    14. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Jérémy Vignal, 2012. "Destinataires et agents du changement : quels comportements adoptent les managers de proximité en contexte de changement ?," Post-Print halshs-01108454, HAL.
    16. Risien, Julie, 2019. "Curators and sojourners in learning networks: Practices for transformation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 71-79.
    17. Lise Arena & Anthony Hussenot, 2021. "From Innovations at Work to Innovative Ways of Conceptualizing Organization: A Brief History of Organization Studies," Post-Print hal-03290300, HAL.
    18. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    19. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01458031, HAL.
    20. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien & Schmidt, Géraldine, 2017. "Goffman's theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 32-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:29:y:2013:i:1:p:63-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.