IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v95y2024ics1059056024003782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic-oriented multiteam system cohesion and enterprise investment decision: Evidence from CESIM platform online simulation experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yawei
  • Gao, Mengli
  • Zhuge, Jianping
  • Ye, Suyang

Abstract

Using CESIM platform financial data on the quality of enterprise investment decision, we assess the impact of strategic-oriented multiteam system cohesion (SOMTS cohesion) on the quality of enterprise investment decision. Based on the resource allocation theory, we found that only SOMTS social cohesion is positively associated with enterprise investment decision, but this impact decreased over the period. Further, team task cohesion moderates the effect in that the positive relationship between SOMTS task cohesion and enterprise investment decision is stronger when team task cohesion is low. The negative relationship between SOMTS task cohesion and enterprise investment decision is stronger when high team task cohesion. The study findings expand the application of multiteam systems theory, offering valuable guidance for executives and boards to enhance decision-making effectiveness from an interdependence perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yawei & Gao, Mengli & Zhuge, Jianping & Ye, Suyang, 2024. "Strategic-oriented multiteam system cohesion and enterprise investment decision: Evidence from CESIM platform online simulation experiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024003782
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024003782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024003782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.