IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v91y2018icp1182-1191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol for induced microseismicity in the first enhanced geothermal systems project in Pohang, Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Kwang-Il
  • Min, Ki-Bok
  • Kim, Kwang-Yeom
  • Choi, Jai Won
  • Yoon, Kern-Shin
  • Yoon, Woon Sang
  • Yoon, Byungjoon
  • Lee, Tae Jong
  • Song, Yoonho

Abstract

The first enhanced geothermal system (EGS) project in South Korea was initiated in Pohang in 2010, and the induced microseismicity has been regarded as a key component. This study presents a regional case study of geothermal energy development in South Korea focusing on a comprehensive protocol that addresses induced microseismicity. The protocol essentially follows the seven steps suggested by the U. S. Department of Energy with necessary site-specific adjustments and improvements. The site selection procedure, outreach program, establishment of a local seismic network, and the methodology of establishing a traffic light system are introduced along with an analysis of induced microseismicity from the first hydraulic stimulation campaign. The equation for estimating vibration due to blasting was converted to an equation that relates peak ground velocity (PGV) to magnitude by using conversion equations between the amount of explosives, the magnitude of the earthquake and the radiated energy. A site-specific traffic light system is suggested based on the equation that relates PGV to magnitude, the site-specific parameters of which were determined by natural earthquakes that occurred within 50 km of the Pohang EGS site. The traffic light system was applied to the first hydraulic stimulation that occurred in January and February of 2016. The obtained induced seismic data were roughly in agreement with the suggested empirical equation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Kwang-Il & Min, Ki-Bok & Kim, Kwang-Yeom & Choi, Jai Won & Yoon, Kern-Shin & Yoon, Woon Sang & Yoon, Byungjoon & Lee, Tae Jong & Song, Yoonho, 2018. "Protocol for induced microseismicity in the first enhanced geothermal systems project in Pohang, Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1182-1191.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:1182-1191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118302430
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lennart Sjöberg, 2004. "Local Acceptance of a High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 737-749, June.
    2. Xie, Linmao & Min, Ki-Bok & Song, Yoonho, 2015. "Observations of hydraulic stimulations in seven enhanced geothermal system projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 56-65.
    3. Lee, Youngmin & Park, Sungho & Kim, Jongchan & Kim, Hyoung Chan & Koo, Min-Ho, 2010. "Geothermal resource assessment in Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2392-2400, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Sungil Kim & Byungjoon Yoon & Jung-Tek Lim & Myungsun Kim, 2021. "Data-Driven Signal–Noise Classification for Microseismic Data Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Wang, Guoying & Ma, Hongwei & Liu, Shaowei & Yang, Dong & Xu, Xiaokai & Fu, Mengxiong & Jia, Housheng, 2022. "Thermal power extraction from a deep, closed-loop, multi-level, multi-branch, U-shaped borehole heat exchanger geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 894-906.
    4. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    5. Liao, Jianxing & Xu, Bin & Mehmood, Faisal & Hu, Ke & Wang, Hong & Hou, Zhengmeng & Xie, Yachen, 2023. "Numerical study of the long-term performance of EGS based on discrete fracture network with consideration of fracture deformation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jongmuk Won & Hyun-Jun Choi & Hyobum Lee & Hangseok Choi, 2016. "Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Cementing Properties on the Thermal and Mechanical Stability of Geothermal Wells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Suh, Jung Woo & Sohn, So Young & Lee, Bo Kyeong, 2020. "Patent clustering and network analyses to explore nuclear waste management technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Tanja Perko & Baldwin van Gorp & Catrinel Turcanu & Peter Thijssen & Benny Carle, 2013. "Communication in Nuclear Emergency Preparedness: A Closer Look at Information Reception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 1987-2001, November.
    5. Liang, Xu & Xu, Tianfu & Chen, Jingyi & Jiang, Zhenjiao, 2023. "A deep-learning based model for fracture network characterization constrained by induced micro-seismicity and tracer test data in enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Yi-Hui Christine Huang & Xiao Wang & Ivy Wai-Yin Fong & Qiudi Wu, 2021. "Examining the Role of Trust in Regulators in Food Safety Risk Assessment: A Cross-regional Analysis of Three Chinese Societies Using an Integrative Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    7. Isaka, B.L. Avanthi & Ranjith, P.G. & Rathnaweera, T.D. & Perera, M.S.A. & Kumari, W.G.P., 2019. "Influence of long-term operation of supercritical carbon dioxide based enhanced geothermal system on mineralogical and microstructurally-induced mechanical alteration of surrounding rock mass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 428-441.
    8. Behnam Taebi, 2017. "Bridging the Gap between Social Acceptance and Ethical Acceptability," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1817-1827, October.
    9. Huang, Lei & He, Ruoying & Yang, Qianqi & Chen, Jin & Zhou, Ying & Hammitt, James K. & Lu, Xi & Bi, Jun & Liu, Yang, 2018. "The changing risk perception towards nuclear power in China after the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 294-301.
    10. Park, Sehyeok & Kim, Kwang-Il & Kwon, Saeha & Yoo, Hwajung & Xie, Linmao & Min, Ki-Bok & Kim, Kwang Yeom, 2018. "Development of a hydraulic stimulation simulator toolbox for enhanced geothermal system design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 879-895.
    11. Xiao Wang & Yi-Hui Christine Huang & Qiudi Wu & Ivy Wai-Yin Fong, 2021. "Exploring the Effects of Instructional Message Strategies on Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions: The Case of a Substandard Vaccine Incident," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    12. Slatlem Vik, Hedda & Salimzadeh, Saeed & Nick, Hamidreza M., 2018. "Heat recovery from multiple-fracture enhanced geothermal systems: The effect of thermoelastic fracture interactions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 606-622.
    13. Xu, Haoran & Cheng, Jingru & Zhao, Zhihong & Lin, Tianyi & Liu, Guihong & Chen, Sicong, 2021. "Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical modeling on acid fracturing in carbonatite geothermal reservoirs containing a heterogeneous fracture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 145-157.
    14. Ghidoni, Riccardo, 2017. "Mistrust and Opposition to Large-Scale Projects : An Experiment on the Role of Uncertainty," Discussion Paper 2017-053, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Pao, Hsiao-Tien & Li, Yi-Ying & Hsin-Chia Fu,, 2014. "Clean energy, non-clean energy, and economic growth in the MIST countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 932-942.
    16. Luo, Jin & Wang, Haiqi & Zhang, Haiyong & Yan, Zezhou, 2021. "A geospatial assessment of the installation potential of shallow geothermal systems in a graben basin," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 553-564.
    17. Kafle, Sagar & Parajuli, Ranjan & Bhattarai, Sujala & Euh, Seung Hee & Kim, Dae Hyun, 2017. "A review on energy systems and GHG emissions reduction plan and policy of the Republic of Korea: Past, present, and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1123-1130.
    18. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Folch-Calvo, Martin & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Borge-Diez, David, 2016. "The geothermal potential in Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 865-886.
    19. Baek, Haein & Chung, Ji-Bum & Yun, Gi Woong, 2021. "Differences in public perceptions of geothermal energy based on EGS technology in Korea after the Pohang earthquake: National vs. local," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    20. Li, Y. & Arulnathan, V. & Heidari, M.D. & Pelletier, N., 2022. "Design considerations for net zero energy buildings for intensive, confined poultry production: A review of current insights, knowledge gaps, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:1182-1191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.