IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v56y2016icp865-886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The geothermal potential in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Colmenar-Santos, Antonio
  • Folch-Calvo, Martin
  • Rosales-Asensio, Enrique
  • Borge-Diez, David

Abstract

With a potential geothermal generation of 610GWt, Spain constitutes a promising EU-28 country for geothermal direct heating systems and binary cycle electricity production. Spain has a need to reduce energy consumption in buildings and in the secondary sector in order to comply with the Spanish Energy Plan 2011–2020, which establishes an objective of 50MWe of electricity generation from geothermal energy and 66MWt for direct heating use. Geothermal pumps are admissible in low and medium temperature heating schemes, but to achieve these energy savings targets, the most interesting way to generate energy is by using a CHP production from binary cycle plants. An analysis determining the energy consumption for Spanish dwellings shows that with a low-temperature design concept for district heating distribution, an organic Rankine cycle plant of 15MWt with a geothermal temperature supply of 105°C and a vector transportation fluid mass of 100kg/s can cover 3% of the expected targets of electricity from geothermal sources and 15% of that expected for direct heating.

Suggested Citation

  • Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Folch-Calvo, Martin & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Borge-Diez, David, 2016. "The geothermal potential in Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 865-886.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:865-886
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115013374
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chamorro, César R. & García-Cuesta, José L. & Mondéjar, María E. & Linares, María M., 2014. "An estimation of the enhanced geothermal systems potential for the Iberian Peninsula," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Sadeghi, Behnam & Khalajmasoumi, Masoumeh, 2015. "A futuristic review for evaluation of geothermal potentials using fuzzy logic and binary index overlay in GIS environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 818-831.
    3. Dalla Rosa, A. & Christensen, J.E., 2011. "Low-energy district heating in energy-efficient building areas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6890-6899.
    4. Hepbasli, Arif & Ozgener, Leyla, 2004. "Development of geothermal energy utilization in Turkey: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 433-460, October.
    5. Huculak, Maciej & Jarczewski, Wojciech & Dej, Magdalena, 2015. "Economic aspects of the use of deep geothermal heat in district heating in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 29-40.
    6. Angelis-Dimakis, Athanasios & Biberacher, Markus & Dominguez, Javier & Fiorese, Giulia & Gadocha, Sabine & Gnansounou, Edgard & Guariso, Giorgio & Kartalidis, Avraam & Panichelli, Luis & Pinedo, Irene, 2011. "Methods and tools to evaluate the availability of renewable energy sources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1182-1200, February.
    7. Barbier, Enrico, 1997. "Nature and technology of geothermal energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 1(1-2), pages 1-69, March.
    8. Etemoglu, A.B. & Can, M., 2007. "Classification of geothermal resources in Turkey by exergy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(7), pages 1596-1606, September.
    9. Hussein, Mohamed T. & Lashin, Aref & Al Bassam, Abdulaziz & Al Arifi, Nassir & Al Zahrani, Ibrahim, 2013. "Geothermal power potential at the western coastal part of Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 668-684.
    10. Bayer, Peter & Rybach, Ladislaus & Blum, Philipp & Brauchler, Ralf, 2013. "Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 446-463.
    11. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    12. Kaya, Eylem & Zarrouk, Sadiq J. & O'Sullivan, Michael J., 2011. "Reinjection in geothermal fields: A review of worldwide experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 47-68, January.
    13. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    14. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    15. Franco, Alessandro & Vaccaro, Maurizio, 2014. "Numerical simulation of geothermal reservoirs for the sustainable design of energy plants: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 987-1002.
    16. Li, You-Rong & Wang, Jian-Ning & Du, Mei-Tang, 2012. "Influence of coupled pinch point temperature difference and evaporation temperature on performance of organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 503-509.
    17. Barbier, Enrico, 2002. "Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 6(1-2), pages 3-65.
    18. Lee, Youngmin & Park, Sungho & Kim, Jongchan & Kim, Hyoung Chan & Koo, Min-Ho, 2010. "Geothermal resource assessment in Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2392-2400, October.
    19. Rubio-Maya, C. & Ambríz Díaz, V.M. & Pastor Martínez, E. & Belman-Flores, J.M., 2015. "Cascade utilization of low and medium enthalpy geothermal resources − A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 689-716.
    20. Franco, Alessandro & Vaccaro, Maurizio, 2012. "An integrated “Reservoir-Plant” strategy for a sustainable and efficient use of geothermal resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 299-310.
    21. Chandarasekharam, D. & Aref, Lashin & Nassir, Al Arifi, 2014. "CO2 mitigation strategy through geothermal energy, Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 154-163.
    22. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    23. Gnutek, Z & Bryszewska-Mazurek, A, 2001. "The thermodynamic analysis of multicycle ORC engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 1075-1082.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodríguez, Fátima & Pérez, Nemesio M. & Melián, Gladys V. & Padrón, Eleazar & Hernández, Pedro A. & Asensio-Ramos, María & Padilla, Germán D. & Barrancos, José & D’Auria, Luca, 2021. "Exploration of deep-seated geothermal reservoirs in the Canary Islands by means of soil CO2 degassing surveys," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1017-1028.
    2. Guillem Piris & Ignasi Herms & Albert Griera & Montse Colomer & Georgina Arnó & Enrique Gomez-Rivas, 2021. "3DHIP-Calculator—A New Tool to Stochastically Assess Deep Geothermal Potential Using the Heat-In-Place Method from Voxel-Based 3D Geological Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    3. García-Anteportalatina, Víctor Manuel & Martín, Mariano, 2022. "Process synthesis for the valorisation of low-grade heat: Geothermal brines and industrial waste streams," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 733-748.
    4. Ignacio Martín Nieto & Pedro Carrasco García & Cristina Sáez Blázquez & Arturo Farfán Martín & Diego González-Aguilera & Javier Carrasco García, 2020. "Geophysical Prospecting for Geothermal Resources in the South of the Duero Basin (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Al-Sayyab, Ali Khalid Shaker & Mota-Babiloni, Adrián & Navarro-Esbrí, Joaquín, 2023. "Performance evaluation of modified compound organic Rankine-vapour compression cycle with two cooling levels, heating, and power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    6. Li, Yu & Rezgui, Yacine & Zhu, Hanxing, 2017. "District heating and cooling optimization and enhancement – Towards integration of renewables, storage and smart grid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 281-294.
    7. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Palomo-Torrejón, Elisabet & Mur-Pérez, Francisco & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique, 2020. "Thermal desalination potential with parabolic trough collectors and geothermal energy in the Spanish southeast," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    2. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    4. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    5. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    6. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    7. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.
    8. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    9. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Rivera Diaz, Alexandre & Kaya, Eylem & Zarrouk, Sadiq J., 2016. "Reinjection in geothermal fields − A worldwide review update," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 105-162.
    11. Wu, Chuang & Yan, Xiao-jiang & Wang, Shun-sen & Bai, Kun-lun & Di, Juan & Cheng, Shang-fang & Li, Jun, 2016. "System optimisation and performance analysis of CO2 transcritical power cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 391-400.
    12. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    13. Wang, Dongxiang & Ling, Xiang & Peng, Hao & Liu, Lin & Tao, LanLan, 2013. "Efficiency and optimal performance evaluation of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 343-352.
    14. Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 664-677.
    15. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1400-1414.
    16. Chen, Chaofan & Witte, Francesco & Tuschy, Ilja & Kolditz, Olaf & Shao, Haibing, 2022. "Parametric optimization and comparative study of an organic Rankine cycle power plant for two-phase geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    17. Ebrahimi, Khosrow & Jones, Gerard F. & Fleischer, Amy S., 2014. "A review of data center cooling technology, operating conditions and the corresponding low-grade waste heat recovery opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 622-638.
    18. Xu, Jinliang & Liu, Chao, 2013. "Effect of the critical temperature of organic fluids on supercritical pressure Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 109-122.
    19. Larsen, Ulrik & Pierobon, Leonardo & Haglind, Fredrik & Gabrielii, Cecilia, 2013. "Design and optimisation of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in marine applications using the principles of natural selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 803-812.
    20. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:865-886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.