IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v38y2014icp154-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO2 mitigation strategy through geothermal energy, Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Chandarasekharam, D.
  • Aref, Lashin
  • Nassir, Al Arifi

Abstract

Saudi Arabia is generating 194.4 billion kWhof electricity through 500,000 barrels of oil. With the demand of electricity growing at 7.5% annually, the country may need 8.3 million barrels oil per day by 2020. This is going to put the country as the leader among the top CO2 emitting countries by 2020 with emissions peaking at 750Gg of CO2 from the current 400,000Gg. This is not a healthy sign for the country׳s GDP. The country can easily mitigate this problem by using the available wet and EGS (enhanced geothermal system) geothermal systems. 13 millionGg of CO2 can be mitigated by utilizing its geothermal energy sources for desalination plants along the western coastal region. Another 900Gg can be mitigated by adopting GHP technology for space cooling and heating. Change in energy policy, solving tariff related issue and adopting CDM through geothermal energy sources, Saudi Arabia can mitigate CO2 emissions and still maintain its supremacy in the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandarasekharam, D. & Aref, Lashin & Nassir, Al Arifi, 2014. "CO2 mitigation strategy through geothermal energy, Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 154-163.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:154-163
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114004195
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John W. Lund, 2010. "Direct Utilization of Geothermal Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(8), pages 1-29, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hsueh, Sung-Lin, 2015. "Assessing the effectiveness of community-promoted environmental protection policy by using a Delphi-fuzzy method: A case study on solar power and plain afforestation in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1286-1295.
    2. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Folch-Calvo, Martin & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Borge-Diez, David, 2016. "The geothermal potential in Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 865-886.
    3. Fan, Jie & Wang, Qiang & Sun, Wei, 2015. "The failure of China׳s Energy Development Strategy 2050 and its impact on carbon emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1160-1170.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Bobo & Xu, Jiuping & Ni, Ting & Li, Meihui, 2015. "Geothermal energy utilization trends from a technological paradigm perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 430-441.
    2. Tomaszewska Barbara, 2012. "Geothermal Water Resources Management – Economic Aspects Of Their Treatment / Gospodarka Zasobami Wód Termalnych - Ekonomiczne Aspekty Ich Uzdatniania," Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi / Mineral Resources Management, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 59-70, December.
    3. Hong, Jin Gi & Zhang, Wen & Luo, Jian & Chen, Yongsheng, 2013. "Modeling of power generation from the mixing of simulated saline and freshwater with a reverse electrodialysis system: The effect of monovalent and multivalent ions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 244-251.
    4. Mahesh, A. & Shoba Jasmin, K.S., 2013. "Role of renewable energy investment in India: An alternative to CO2 mitigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 414-424.
    5. Zhang, Linfeng & Zhang, Quan & Huang, Gongsheng, 2016. "A transient quasi-3D entire time scale line source model for the fluid and ground temperature prediction of vertical ground heat exchangers (GHEs)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 65-75.
    6. Kousksou, T. & Allouhi, A. & Belattar, M. & Jamil, A. & El Rhafiki, T. & Arid, A. & Zeraouli, Y., 2015. "Renewable energy potential and national policy directions for sustainable development in Morocco," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 46-57.
    7. Sun, Fengrui & Yao, Yuedong & Li, Guozhen & Li, Xiangfang, 2018. "Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 760-773.
    8. Nakomcic-Smaragdakis, Branka & Dvornic, Tijana & Cepic, Zoran & Dragutinovic, Natasa, 2016. "Analysis and possible geothermal energy utilization in a municipality of Panonian Basin of Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 940-951.
    9. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    10. Sanchez-Alfaro, Pablo & Sielfeld, Gerd & Campen, Bart Van & Dobson, Patrick & Fuentes, Víctor & Reed, Andy & Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo & Morata, Diego, 2015. "Geothermal barriers, policies and economics in Chile – Lessons for the Andes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1390-1401.
    11. George Antoneas & Irene Koronaki, 2024. "Geothermal Solutions for Urban Energy Challenges: A Focus on CO 2 Plume Geothermal Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Mrityunjay Singh & Saeed Mahmoodpour & Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger & Ingo Sass & Michael Drews, 2023. "Influence of Reservoir Heterogeneity on Simultaneous Geothermal Energy Extraction and CO 2 Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Caner Çuhac & Anne Mäkiranta & Petri Välisuo & Erkki Hiltunen & Mohammed Elmusrati, 2020. "Temperature Measurements on a Solar and Low Enthalpy Geothermal Open-Air Asphalt Surface Platform in a Cold Climate Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Hähnlein, Stefanie & Bayer, Peter & Ferguson, Grant & Blum, Philipp, 2013. "Sustainability and policy for the thermal use of shallow geothermal energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 914-925.
    15. Muñoz, Mauricio & Garat, Pablo & Flores-Aqueveque, Valentina & Vargas, Gabriel & Rebolledo, Sofía & Sepúlveda, Sergio & Daniele, Linda & Morata, Diego & Parada, Miguel Ángel, 2015. "Estimating low-enthalpy geothermal energy potential for district heating in Santiago basin–Chile (33.5 °S)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 186-195.
    16. Aretouyap, Zakari & Nouck, Philippe Njandjock & Nouayou, Robert, 2016. "A discussion of major geophysical methods used for geothermal exploration in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 775-781.
    17. Gude, Veera Gnaneswar, 2016. "Geothermal source potential for water desalination – Current status and future perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1038-1065.
    18. Xiao-Hui Sun & Hongbin Yan & Mehrdad Massoudi & Zhi-Hua Chen & Wei-Tao Wu, 2018. "Numerical Simulation of Nanofluid Suspensions in a Geothermal Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Kharseh, Mohamad & Altorkmany, Lobna & Al-Khawaja, Mohammed & Hassani, Ferri, 2015. "Analysis of the effect of global climate change on ground source heat pump systems in different climate categories," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 219-225.
    20. Tsubaki, Koutaro & Mitsutake, Yuichi, 2016. "Performance of ground-source heat exchangers using short residential foundation piles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 229-236.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Saudi Arabia; Geothermal systems; EGS; Granites; Harrats; CO2;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:154-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.