IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7338-d672243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3DHIP-Calculator—A New Tool to Stochastically Assess Deep Geothermal Potential Using the Heat-In-Place Method from Voxel-Based 3D Geological Models

Author

Listed:
  • Guillem Piris

    (Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Ignasi Herms

    (Àrea de Recursos Geològics, Institut Cartogràfic i Geològic de Catalunya (ICGC), 08038 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Albert Griera

    (Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Montse Colomer

    (Àrea de Recursos Geològics, Institut Cartogràfic i Geològic de Catalunya (ICGC), 08038 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Georgina Arnó

    (Àrea de Recursos Geològics, Institut Cartogràfic i Geològic de Catalunya (ICGC), 08038 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Enrique Gomez-Rivas

    (Departament de Mineralogia, Petrologia i Geologia Aplicada, Facultat de Ciències de la Terra, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

The assessment of the deep geothermal potential is an essential task during the early phases of any geothermal project. The well-known “Heat-In-Place” volumetric method is the most widely used technique to estimate the available stored heat and the recoverable heat fraction of deep geothermal reservoirs at the regional scale. Different commercial and open-source software packages have been used to date to estimate these parameters. However, these tools are either not freely available, can only consider the entire reservoir volume or a specific part as a single-voxel model, or are restricted to certain geographical areas. The 3DHIP-Calculator tool presented in this contribution is an open-source software designed for the assessment of the deep geothermal potential at the regional scale using the volumetric method based on a stochastic approach. The tool estimates the Heat-In-Place and recoverable thermal energy using 3D geological and 3D thermal voxel models as input data. The 3DHIP-Calculator includes an easy-to-use graphical user interface (GUI) for visualizing and exporting the results to files for further postprocessing, including GIS-based map generation. The use and functionalities of the 3DHIP-Calculator are demonstrated through a case study of the Reus-Valls sedimentary basin (NE, Spain).

Suggested Citation

  • Guillem Piris & Ignasi Herms & Albert Griera & Montse Colomer & Georgina Arnó & Enrique Gomez-Rivas, 2021. "3DHIP-Calculator—A New Tool to Stochastically Assess Deep Geothermal Potential Using the Heat-In-Place Method from Voxel-Based 3D Geological Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7338-:d:672243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. António Trota & Pedro Ferreira & Luis Gomes & João Cabral & Peter Kallberg, 2019. "Power Production Estimates from Geothermal Resources by Means of Small-Size Compact Climeon Heat Power Converters: Case Studies from Portugal (Sete Cidades, Azores and Longroiva Spa, Mainland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Willems, C.J.L. & M. Nick, H., 2019. "Towards optimisation of geothermal heat recovery: An example from the West Netherlands Basin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 582-593.
    3. Mafalda M. Miranda & Jasmin Raymond & Chrystel Dezayes, 2020. "Uncertainty and Risk Evaluation of Deep Geothermal Energy Source for Heat Production and Electricity Generation in Remote Northern Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-35, August.
    4. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Folch-Calvo, Martin & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Borge-Diez, David, 2016. "The geothermal potential in Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 865-886.
    5. Thorsten Agemar & Josef Weber & Rüdiger Schulz, 2014. "Deep Geothermal Energy Production in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Yibo Wang & Lijuan Wang & Yang Bai & Zhuting Wang & Jie Hu & Di Hu & Yaqi Wang & Shengbiao Hu, 2021. "Assessment of Geothermal Resources in the North Jiangsu Basin, East China, Using Monte Carlo Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Thorsten Agemar & Josef Weber & Inga S. Moeck, 2018. "Assessment and Public Reporting of Geothermal Resources in Germany: Review and Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Trumpy, E. & Botteghi, S. & Caiozzi, F. & Donato, A. & Gola, G. & Montanari, D. & Pluymaekers, M.P.D. & Santilano, A. & van Wees, J.D. & Manzella, A., 2016. "Geothermal potential assessment for a low carbon strategy: A new systematic approach applied in southern Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 167-181.
    9. Cao Wang, 2021. "Monte Carlo Simulation," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Structural Reliability and Time-Dependent Reliability, chapter 0, pages 105-163, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Frick & Stefan Kranz & Ben Norden & David Bruhn & Sven Fuchs, 2022. "Geothermal Resources and ATES Potential of Mesozoic Reservoirs in the North German Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Anna Wachowicz-Pyzik & Anna Sowiżdżał & Leszek Pająk & Paweł Ziółkowski & Janusz Badur, 2020. "Assessment of the Effective Variants Leading to Higher Efficiency for the Geothermal Doublet, Using Numerical Analysis‒Case Study from Poland (Szczecin Trough)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Guilin Zhu & Linyou Zhang & Zhihui Deng & Qingda Feng & Zhaoxuan Niu & Wenhao Xu, 2023. "Three-Dimensional Geological Modeling and Resource Estimation of Hot Dry Rock in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai Province," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Weinand, J.M. & McKenna, R. & Fichtner, W., 2019. "Developing a municipality typology for modelling decentralised energy systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 75-96.
    5. Weinand, Jann Michael & Kleinebrahm, Max & McKenna, Russell & Mainzer, Kai & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "Developing a combinatorial optimisation approach to design district heating networks based on deep geothermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Nadkarni, Kabir & Renaud, Evan, 2020. "Estimating parasitic loads related to brine production from a hot sedimentary aquifer geothermal project: A case study from the Clarke Lake gas field, British Columbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 539-552.
    8. Strobel, Gion & Hagemann, Birger & Huppertz, Thiago Martins & Ganzer, Leonhard, 2020. "Underground bio-methanation: Concept and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    9. Davide Toselli & Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2019. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Binary Cycles with Geothermal Energy and Biogas Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Diana D’Agostino & Francesco Esposito & Adriana Greco & Claudia Masselli & Francesco Minichiello, 2020. "Parametric Analysis on an Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger Employed in an Air Conditioning System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Majorowicz, Jacek & Grasby, Stephen E., 2019. "Deep geothermal energy in Canadian sedimentary basins VS. Fossils based energy we try to replace – Exergy [KJ/KG] compared," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 259-277.
    12. Wei Zhang & Qihong Feng & Sen Wang & Xianmin Zhang & Jiyuan Zhang & Xiaopeng Cao, 2022. "Molecular Simulation Study and Analytical Model for Oil–Water Two-Phase Fluid Transport in Shale Inorganic Nanopores," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Knoblauch, Theresa A.K. & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Stauffacher, Michael, 2019. "Siting deep geothermal energy: Acceptance of various risk and benefit scenarios in a Swiss-German cross-national study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 807-816.
    14. Andrea Ferrantelli & Jevgeni Fadejev & Jarek Kurnitski, 2019. "Energy Pile Field Simulation in Large Buildings: Validation of Surface Boundary Assumptions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Carlo Roselli & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Energy, Environmental, and Economic Analyses of Geothermal Polygeneration System Using Dynamic Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-34, September.
    16. Martina Gizzi & Federico Vagnon & Glenda Taddia & Stefano Lo Russo, 2023. "A Review of Groundwater Heat Pump Systems in the Italian Framework: Technological Potential and Environmental Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Wang, Yuqing & Liu, Yingxin & Dou, Jinyue & Li, Mingzhu & Zeng, Ming, 2020. "Geothermal energy in China: Status, challenges, and policy recommendations," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Marta Bottero & Federico Dell’Anna & Vito Morgese, 2021. "Evaluating the Transition Towards Post-Carbon Cities: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Li, Jing & Xie, Yetong & Liu, Huimin & Zhang, Xuecai & Li, Chuanhua & Zhang, Lisong, 2023. "Combining macro and micro experiments to reveal the real-time evolution of permeability of shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    20. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Palomo-Torrejón, Elisabet & Mur-Pérez, Francisco & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique, 2020. "Thermal desalination potential with parabolic trough collectors and geothermal energy in the Spanish southeast," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7338-:d:672243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.