IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v185y2023ics1364032123004677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty models for the structural design of floating offshore wind turbines: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Ramezani, Mahyar
  • Choe, Do-Eun
  • Heydarpour, Khashayar
  • Koo, Bonjun

Abstract

Floating offshore wind turbines have arisen as a promising option to access massive wind energy resources in deep water, where the existing fixed-type offshore wind turbine is no longer practical. However, due to the nature of the oceanic environmental conditions, large uncertainties are involved in the aerodynamic/hydrodynamic calculations, which are coupled with those within the structures and materials. This not only threatens its reliability but also drastically increases the manufacturing cost of floating offshore wind turbines. To understand the uncertainty within the system and properly predict its reliability, first, the uncertainties involved in the environments and subsystems need to be defined. Therefore, this paper aims to provide an extensive review of the uncertainty models involved in the structural design of floating offshore wind turbines. The presented uncertainties within the structures include those inherent in the material and geometrical/mechanical properties of the wind turbine, floating structures, and mooring lines. The uncertainties within hydrodynamics include empirical parameters and nonlinearities involved with the hydrodynamics modeling of the floaters. Within the environmental loads, the parameter uncertainties as well as the randomness of wind and wave loads are presented. The uncertainties growing over time caused by fatigue, corrosion, and climate hazards are also discussed. In addition, the correlation between the random variables, such as the correlation of the wind and wave, is presented. Finally, the method of treating those uncertainties is discussed, including the probabilistic model which incorporates the uncertainties and the correlations between the random variables, as well as modeling errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramezani, Mahyar & Choe, Do-Eun & Heydarpour, Khashayar & Koo, Bonjun, 2023. "Uncertainty models for the structural design of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:185:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123004677
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123004677
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Shuaishuai & Moan, Torgeir & Jiang, Zhiyu, 2022. "Influence of variability and uncertainty of wind and waves on fatigue damage of a floating wind turbine drivetrain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 870-897.
    2. Okpokparoro, Salem & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2021. "Uncertainty modeling in reliability analysis of floating wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 88-108.
    3. Wais, Piotr, 2017. "Two and three-parameter Weibull distribution in available wind power analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 15-29.
    4. Kim, Dong Hyawn & Lee, Sang Geun, 2015. "Reliability analysis of offshore wind turbine support structures under extreme ocean environmental loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 161-166.
    5. Choe, Do-Eun & Kim, Hyoung-Chul & Kim, Moo-Hyun, 2021. "Sequence-based modeling of deep learning with LSTM and GRU networks for structural damage detection of floating offshore wind turbine blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 218-235.
    6. Yue Zhao & Jijian Lian & Chong Lian & Xiaofeng Dong & Haijun Wang & Chunxi Liu & Qi Jiang & Pengwen Wang, 2019. "Stochastic Dynamic Analysis of an Offshore Wind Turbine Structure by the Path Integration Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Wang, L. & Kolios, A. & Liu, X. & Venetsanos, D. & Rui, C., 2022. "Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Wais, Piotr, 2017. "A review of Weibull functions in wind sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1099-1107.
    9. Zhenzhong Zeng & Alan D. Ziegler & Timothy Searchinger & Long Yang & Anping Chen & Kunlu Ju & Shilong Piao & Laurent Z. X. Li & Philippe Ciais & Deliang Chen & Junguo Liu & Cesar Azorin-Molina & Adria, 2019. "A reversal in global terrestrial stilling and its implications for wind energy production," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(12), pages 979-985, December.
    10. Yaniktepe, B. & Koroglu, T. & Savrun, M.M., 2013. "Investigation of wind characteristics and wind energy potential in Osmaniye, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 703-711.
    11. Shu, Z.R. & Li, Q.S. & Chan, P.W., 2015. "Investigation of offshore wind energy potential in Hong Kong based on Weibull distribution function," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 362-373.
    12. Li, Xuan & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "Long-term assessment of a floating offshore wind turbine under environmental conditions with multivariate dependence structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 764-775.
    13. Takeshi Ishihara & Yuliang Liu, 2020. "Dynamic Response Analysis of a Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbine in Combined Wave and Current Conditions Using Advanced Hydrodynamic Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Pacheco, A. & Gorbeña, E. & Sequeira, C. & Jerez, S., 2017. "An evaluation of offshore wind power production by floatable systems: A case study from SW Portugal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 239-250.
    15. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2021. "Reliability-based design optimization of a spar-type floating offshore wind turbine support structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Lee, Myung Eun & Kim, Gunwoo & Jeong, Shin-Taek & Ko, Dong Hui & Kang, Keum Seok, 2013. "Assessment of offshore wind energy at Younggwang in Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 131-141.
    17. John D. Sørensen & Henrik S. Toft, 2010. "Probabilistic Design of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Li, Xuan & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "Long-term fatigue damage assessment for a floating offshore wind turbine under realistic environmental conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 570-584.
    19. Keyhani, A. & Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M. & Khanali, M. & Abbaszadeh, R., 2010. "An assessment of wind energy potential as a power generation source in the capital of Iran, Tehran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 188-201.
    20. Pokhrel, Jharna & Seo, Junwon, 2021. "Statistical model for fragility estimates of offshore wind turbines subjected to aero-hydro dynamic loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1495-1507.
    21. Zhiyu Jiang & Weifei Hu & Wenbin Dong & Zhen Gao & Zhengru Ren, 2017. "Structural Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    22. Tran, Thanh Toan & Kim, Dong-Hyun, 2016. "Fully coupled aero-hydrodynamic analysis of a semi-submersible FOWT using a dynamic fluid body interaction approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 244-261.
    23. Dong, Wenbin & Moan, Torgeir & Gao, Zhen, 2012. "Fatigue reliability analysis of the jacket support structure for offshore wind turbine considering the effect of corrosion and inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 11-27.
    24. Choe, Do-Eun & Gardoni, Paolo & Rosowsky, David & Haukaas, Terje, 2008. "Probabilistic capacity models and seismic fragility estimates for RC columns subject to corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 383-393.
    25. Lee, M.Q. & Lu, C.N. & Huang, H.S., 2009. "Reliability and cost analyses of electricity collection systems of a marine current farm--A Taiwanese case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 2012-2021, October.
    26. Jian Zhang & Guo-Kai Yuan & Songye Zhu & Quan Gu & Shitang Ke & Jinghua Lin, 2022. "Seismic Analysis of 10 MW Offshore Wind Turbine with Large-Diameter Monopile in Consideration of Seabed Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, March.
    27. Clark, Caitlyn E. & DuPont, Bryony, 2018. "Reliability-based design optimization in offshore renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 390-400.
    28. Truong, Hoai Vu Anh & Dang, Tri Dung & Vo, Cong Phat & Ahn, Kyoung Kwan, 2022. "Active control strategies for system enhancement and load mitigation of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    29. Altunkaynak, Abdüsselam & Erdik, Tarkan & Dabanlı, İsmail & Şen, Zekai, 2012. "Theoretical derivation of wind power probability distribution function and applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 809-814.
    30. Chen, Chaohe & Ma, Yuan & Fan, Tianhui, 2022. "Review of model experimental methods focusing on aerodynamic simulation of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    31. Dong, Sheng & Tao, Shanshan & Li, Xue & Soares, C. Guedes, 2015. "Trivariate maximum entropy distribution of significant wave height, wind speed and relative direction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 538-549.
    32. Horn, Jan-Tore & Leira, Bernt J., 2019. "Fatigue reliability assessment of offshore wind turbines with stochastic availability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    33. Li, He & Guedes Soares, C, 2022. "Assessment of failure rates and reliability of floating offshore wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    34. Uzunoglu, E. & Guedes Soares, C., 2019. "Yaw motion of floating wind turbine platforms induced by pitch actuator fault in storm conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1056-1070.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeng, Xinmeng & Shao, Yanlin & Feng, Xingya & Xu, Kun & Jin, Ruijia & Li, Huajun, 2024. "Nonlinear hydrodynamics of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Xinmeng & Shao, Yanlin & Feng, Xingya & Xu, Kun & Jin, Ruijia & Li, Huajun, 2024. "Nonlinear hydrodynamics of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Katinas, Vladislovas & Gecevicius, Giedrius & Marciukaitis, Mantas, 2018. "An investigation of wind power density distribution at location with low and high wind speeds using statistical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 442-451.
    3. Wang, L. & Kolios, A. & Liu, X. & Venetsanos, D. & Rui, C., 2022. "Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Thapa, Mishal & Missoum, Samy, 2022. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of composite wind turbine blades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Shittu, Abdulhakim Adeoye & Mehmanparast, Ali & Hart, Phil & Kolios, Athanasios, 2021. "Comparative study between S-N and fracture mechanics approach on reliability assessment of offshore wind turbine jacket foundations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Munir Ali Elfarra & Mustafa Kaya, 2018. "Comparison of Optimum Spline-Based Probability Density Functions to Parametric Distributions for the Wind Speed Data in Terms of Annual Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Li, Xuan & Zhang, Wei, 2022. "Physics-informed deep learning model in wind turbine response prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 932-944.
    8. Song, Yupeng & Basu, Biswajit & Zhang, Zili & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard & Li, Jie & Chen, Jianbing, 2021. "Dynamic reliability analysis of a floating offshore wind turbine under wind-wave joint excitations via probability density evolution method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 991-1014.
    9. Zhang, Ruixing & An, Liqiang & He, Lun & Yang, Xinmeng & Huang, Zenghao, 2024. "Reliability analysis and inverse optimization method for floating wind turbines driven by dual meta-models combining transient-steady responses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    10. Zhiyu Jiang & Weifei Hu & Wenbin Dong & Zhen Gao & Zhengru Ren, 2017. "Structural Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Wais, Piotr, 2017. "A review of Weibull functions in wind sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1099-1107.
    12. Okpokparoro, Salem & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2021. "Uncertainty modeling in reliability analysis of floating wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 88-108.
    13. Song, Yupeng & Sun, Tao & Zhang, Zili, 2023. "Fatigue reliability analysis of floating offshore wind turbines considering the uncertainty due to finite sampling of load conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 570-588.
    14. Mehr Gul & Nengling Tai & Wentao Huang & Muhammad Haroon Nadeem & Moduo Yu, 2019. "Assessment of Wind Power Potential and Economic Analysis at Hyderabad in Pakistan: Powering to Local Communities Using Wind Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Liao, Ding & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Correia, José A.F.O. & De Jesus, Abílio M.P. & Veljkovic, Milan & Berto, Filippo, 2022. "Fatigue reliability of wind turbines: historical perspectives, recent developments and future prospects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 724-742.
    16. Saeed, Muhammad Abid & Ahmed, Zahoor & Zhang, Weidong, 2020. "Wind energy potential and economic analysis with a comparison of different methods for determining the optimal distribution parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1092-1109.
    17. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2018. "A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1065-1076.
    18. Yeter, B. & Garbatov, Y. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "Risk-based maintenance planning of offshore wind turbine farms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    19. Rabbani, R. & Zeeshan, M., 2020. "Exploring the suitability of MERRA-2 reanalysis data for wind energy estimation, analysis of wind characteristics and energy potential assessment for selected sites in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1240-1251.
    20. Katarzyna Wolniewicz & Adam Zagubień & Mirosław Wesołowski, 2021. "Energy and Acoustic Environmental Effective Approach for a Wind Farm Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:185:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123004677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.