IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v159y2020icp570-584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term fatigue damage assessment for a floating offshore wind turbine under realistic environmental conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xuan
  • Zhang, Wei

Abstract

Offshore wind energy has gained widespread attention and experienced a rapid development due to the significantly increasing demand for renewable energy over the past few years. Currently, the development of offshore floating wind turbines attracts lots of attention to harvest more energy from a sustained higher speed of offshore wind away from the coastline. With stronger cyclic wind and wave loadings, the floating wind turbine could possibly experience severe fatigue damages at certain critical locations, which might lead to a catastrophic failure. Evaluating accumulated fatigue damage for a floating wind turbine during its entire lifetime, therefore, becomes essential and urgent. As demonstrated in the codes, specifications, or design practices, fatigue assessments require massive computational costs and pose challenges to numerical simulations since lots of dynamic analyses under different environmental scenarios need to be performed. To reduce the calculation cost for this time-consuming process while maintaining high accuracy, a probabilistic long-term fatigue damage assessment approach is proposed in the present study by implementing a C-vine copula model and a surrogate model. The C-vine copula model provides a multivariate dependency description for the on-site wind and wave-related environmental parameters. Two surrogate models, including the Kriging model and the artificial neural network (ANN), are implemented to efficiently predict the short-term fatigue damages at critical locations of the floating wind turbine. The proposed long-term fatigue damage assessment framework is accurate and suitable for evaluating structural long-term fatigue damages accumulated in a real environment especially when effects from more environmental parameters are to be considered. Based on surrogate models, sensitivity analyses are carried out to investigate the relative significance of each environmental parameter on short-term fatigue damages. In addition, uncertainties from short-term fatigue damages are also incorporated into the probabilistic fatigue evaluation framework to assess the accumulated long-term fatigue damages for a spar type floating wind turbine.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xuan & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "Long-term fatigue damage assessment for a floating offshore wind turbine under realistic environmental conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 570-584.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:159:y:2020:i:c:p:570-584
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120309435
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murcia, Juan Pablo & Réthoré, Pierre-Elouan & Dimitrov, Nikolay & Natarajan, Anand & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard & Graf, Peter & Kim, Taeseong, 2018. "Uncertainty propagation through an aeroelastic wind turbine model using polynomial surrogates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 910-922.
    2. Li, Xuan & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "Long-term assessment of a floating offshore wind turbine under environmental conditions with multivariate dependence structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 764-775.
    3. Manobel, Bartolomé & Sehnke, Frank & Lazzús, Juan A. & Salfate, Ignacio & Felder, Martin & Montecinos, Sonia, 2018. "Wind turbine power curve modeling based on Gaussian Processes and Artificial Neural Networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1015-1020.
    4. Kaldellis, John K. & Zafirakis, D., 2011. "The wind energy (r)evolution: A short review of a long history," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1887-1901.
    5. Echard, B. & Gayton, N. & Lemaire, M. & Relun, N., 2013. "A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 232-240.
    6. Dißmann, J. & Brechmann, E.C. & Czado, C. & Kurowicka, D., 2013. "Selecting and estimating regular vine copulae and application to financial returns," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 52-69.
    7. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Barooni & Turaj Ashuri & Deniz Velioglu Sogut & Stephen Wood & Shiva Ghaderpour Taleghani, 2022. "Floating Offshore Wind Turbines: Current Status and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Zhu, Dongping & Huang, Xiaogang & Ding, Zhixia & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Estimation of wind turbine responses with attention-based neural network incorporating environmental uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Bowen Zhou & Zhibo Zhang & Guangdi Li & Dongsheng Yang & Matilde Santos, 2023. "Review of Key Technologies for Offshore Floating Wind Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Zhu, Yongchao & Zhu, Caichao & Tan, Jianjun & Tan, Yong & Rao, Lei, 2022. "Anomaly detection and condition monitoring of wind turbine gearbox based on LSTM-FS and transfer learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 90-103.
    5. Liu, Ding Peng & Ferri, Giulio & Heo, Taemin & Marino, Enzo & Manuel, Lance, 2024. "On long-term fatigue damage estimation for a floating offshore wind turbine using a surrogate model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Han, Chaoshuai & Liu, Kun & Ma, Yongliang & Qin, Peijiang & Zou, Tao, 2021. "Multiaxial fatigue assessment of jacket-supported offshore wind turbines considering multiple random correlated loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1252-1264.
    7. Abramic, A. & García Mendoza, A. & Haroun, R., 2021. "Introducing offshore wind energy in the sea space: Canary Islands case study developed under Maritime Spatial Planning principles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Li, Xuan & Zhang, Wei, 2022. "Physics-informed deep learning model in wind turbine response prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 932-944.
    9. Zhu, Yongchao & Zhu, Caichao & Tan, Jianjun & Wang, Yili & Tao, Jianquan, 2022. "Operational state assessment of wind turbine gearbox based on long short-term memory networks and fuzzy synthesis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1167-1176.
    10. Song, Yupeng & Sun, Tao & Zhang, Zili, 2023. "Fatigue reliability analysis of floating offshore wind turbines considering the uncertainty due to finite sampling of load conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 570-588.
    11. Ramezani, Mahyar & Choe, Do-Eun & Heydarpour, Khashayar & Koo, Bonjun, 2023. "Uncertainty models for the structural design of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Menz, Morgane & Gogu, Christian & Dubreuil, Sylvain & Bartoli, Nathalie & Morio, Jérôme, 2020. "Adaptive coupling of reduced basis modeling and Kriging based active learning methods for reliability analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Benoumechiara Nazih & Bousquet Nicolas & Michel Bertrand & Saint-Pierre Philippe, 2020. "Detecting and modeling critical dependence structures between random inputs of computer models," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 263-297, January.
    3. Song, Yupeng & Basu, Biswajit & Zhang, Zili & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard & Li, Jie & Chen, Jianbing, 2021. "Dynamic reliability analysis of a floating offshore wind turbine under wind-wave joint excitations via probability density evolution method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 991-1014.
    4. Chengning Zhou & Ning-Cong Xiao & Ming J Zuo & Xiaoxu Huang, 2020. "AK-PDF: An active learning method combining kriging and probability density function for efficient reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 536-549, June.
    5. Bolin Liu & Liyang Xie, 2020. "An Improved Structural Reliability Analysis Method Based on Local Approximation and Parallelization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Dong, Y. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "Application of adaptive surrogate models in time-variant fatigue reliability assessment of welded joints with surface cracks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    8. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2019. "REAK: Reliability analysis through Error rate-based Adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 33-45.
    9. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2018. "An efficient-robust structural reliability method by adaptive finite-step length based on Armijo line search," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 195-206.
    10. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Kisi, Ozgur, 2018. "RM5Tree: Radial basis M5 model tree for accurate structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 49-61.
    11. Ni, Pinghe & Li, Jun & Hao, Hong & Yan, Weimin & Du, Xiuli & Zhou, Hongyuan, 2020. "Reliability analysis and design optimization of nonlinear structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Teixeira, Rui & Nogal, Maria & O’Connor, Alan & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz, 2020. "Reliability assessment with density scanned adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Zhang, Xufang & Wang, Lei & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "REIF: A novel active-learning function toward adaptive Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 440-454.
    14. Xu, Jun & Kong, Fan, 2018. "A new unequal-weighted sampling method for efficient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 94-102.
    15. Zhang, Jinhao & Xiao, Mi & Gao, Liang, 2019. "An active learning reliability method combining Kriging constructed with exploration and exploitation of failure region and subset simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 90-102.
    16. Steiner, M. & Bourinet, J.-M. & Lahmer, T., 2019. "An adaptive sampling method for global sensitivity analysis based on least-squares support vector regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 323-340.
    17. Wei, Pengfei & Liu, Fuchao & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "Reliability and reliability-based importance analysis of structural systems using multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 183-195.
    18. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang & Wang, Dapeng & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming, 2020. "EEK-SYS: System reliability analysis through estimation error-guided adaptive Kriging approximation of multiple limit state surfaces," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Yang, Seonghyeok & Lee, Mingyu & Lee, Ikjin, 2023. "A new sampling approach for system reliability-based design optimization under multiple simulation models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    20. Zhang, Yu & Dong, You & Frangopol, Dan M., 2024. "An error-based stopping criterion for spherical decomposition-based adaptive Kriging model and rare event estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:159:y:2020:i:c:p:570-584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.