IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v162y2022ics1364032122003380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revitalizing varieties of capitalism for sustainability transitions research: Review, critique and way forward

Author

Listed:
  • Loewen, Bradley

Abstract

Despite recent calls for more critical views of capitalism in sustainability transitions research, a starting point for transitions researchers is lacking. Recognizing the potential of the varieties of capitalism (VoC) approach to bring capitalism deeper into transitions research, this paper constitutes a review of VoC in the sustainability transitions literature, returning to its theoretical foundations in coordination and strategic interactions and their relations to innovation and socio-technical system transformation. The review finds the most common application of VoC to be in the energy dimension of transition, nevertheless revealing a shallow engagement with the approach that reinforces the need for conceptual development for sustainability transitions purposes. Potential areas for development relate to the enrichment of core VoC concepts – coordination, strategic interaction and comparative institutional advantage – and to competing growth and sustainability objectives of existing (and beyond) capitalist systems. There is a further need to expand the scope of VoC application beyond ideal-form national archetypes to infiltrate across scales and levels, as well as to go beyond the traditional range of sectors to shed light on understudied actors, roles and power relations for transitions. Despite typical delegation to political economy, VoC is highly interdisciplinary, applicable to common frameworks used in transition studies and amenable to social scientists interested in power and agency in transitions. As a strategy for moving VoC forward in transitions research, it is recommended to place it at the core of studies taking institutions, stakeholder interactions and sector coordination in their contextual situations seriously.

Suggested Citation

  • Loewen, Bradley, 2022. "Revitalizing varieties of capitalism for sustainability transitions research: Review, critique and way forward," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122003380
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122003380
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schot, Johan & Kanger, Laur, 2018. "Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1045-1059.
    2. Moallemi, Enayat A. & Aye, Lu & Webb, John M. & de Haan, Fjalar J. & George, Biju A., 2017. "India's on-grid solar power development: Historical transitions, present status and future driving forces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 239-247.
    3. Robyn Eckersley, 2020. "The Green State in Transition: Reply to Bailey, Barry and Craig," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 46-56, January.
    4. Caroline Kuzemko & Andrew Lawrence & Matthew Watson, 2019. "New directions in the international political economy of energy," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Arne Isaksen & Stig-Erik Jakobsen, 2017. "New path development between innovation systems and individual actors," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 355-370, March.
    6. Arne Isaksen & Roman Martin & Michaela Trippl (ed.), 2018. "New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-71661-9, December.
    7. Luís Carvalho & Mário Vale, 2018. "Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(2), pages 275-295.
    8. Ross Brown, 2021. "Mission-oriented or mission adrift? A critical examination of mission-oriented innovation policies," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 739-761, April.
    9. Fagerberg, Jan, 2018. "Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1568-1576.
    10. Coenen, Lars & Benneworth, Paul & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 968-979.
    11. Erick Lachapelle & Robert MacNeil & Matthew Paterson, 2017. "The political economy of decarbonisation: from green energy ‘race’ to green ‘division of labour’," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 311-327, May.
    12. John Mikler & Neil Harrison, 2012. "Varieties of Capitalism and Technological Innovation for Climate Change Mitigation," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 179-208.
    13. Erick Lachapelle & Matthew Paterson, 2013. "Drivers of national climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 547-571, September.
    14. Philip Cooke, 2010. "Socio-technical Transitions and Varieties of Capitalism: Green Regional Innovation and Distinctive Market Niches," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 1(4), pages 239-267, December.
    15. Simone Strambach, 2017. "Combining Knowledge Bases in Transnational Sustainability Innovation: Microdynamics and Institutional Change," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 93(5), pages 500-526, October.
    16. Stefan Ćetković & Aron Buzogány, 2019. "The Political Economy of EU Climate and Energy Policies in Central and Eastern Europe Revisited: Shifting Coalitions and Prospects for Clean Energy Transitions," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 124-138.
    17. Daniela Baer & Bradley Loewen & Caroline Cheng & Judith Thomsen & Annemie Wyckmans & Alenka Temeljotov-Salaj & Dirk Ahlers, 2021. "Approaches to Social Innovation in Positive Energy Districts (PEDs)—A Comparison of Norwegian Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Michael Fritsch & Holger Graf, 2011. "How sub‐national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 331-353, June.
    19. Geoffrey Jones & Christina Lubinski, 2014. "Making 'Green Giants': Environment sustainability in the German chemical industry, 1950s-1980s," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 623-649, June.
    20. Sengers, Frans & Wieczorek, Anna J. & Raven, Rob, 2019. "Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 153-164.
    21. Borrás, Susana & Edler, Jakob, 2020. "The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    22. Julia Maria Wittmayer & Tessa de Geus & Bonno Pel & F. Avelino & Sabine Hielscher & Thomas Hoppe & Marie Susan Mühlemeier & Agata Stasik & Sem Oxenaar & Karoline K.S. Rogge & Vivian Visser & Esther Ma, 2020. "Beyond instrumentalism: Broadening the understanding of social innovation in socio-technical energy systems," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/312323, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    23. Ron Boschma & Lars Coenen & Koen Frenken & Bernhard Truffer, 2017. "Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 31-45, January.
    24. Markus Grillitsch, 2019. "Following or breaking regional development paths: on the role and capability of the innovative entrepreneur," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 681-691, May.
    25. Danny MacKinnon & Stuart Dawley & Andy Pike & Andrew Cumbers, 2019. "Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 95(2), pages 113-135, March.
    26. Rentier, Gerrit & Lelieveldt, Herman & Kramer, Gert Jan, 2019. "Varieties of coal-fired power phase-out across Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 620-632.
    27. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4vsqk7docb9nmophtp29pk68cr is not listed on IDEAS
    28. Wustenhagen, Rolf & Wolsink, Maarten & Burer, Mary Jean, 2007. "Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2683-2691, May.
    29. Geddes, Anna & Schmidt, Tobias S., 2020. "Integrating finance into the multi-level perspective: Technology niche-finance regime interactions and financial policy interventions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    30. Devine-Wright, Patrick & Batel, Susana & Aas, Oystein & Sovacool, Benjamin & Labelle, Michael Carnegie & Ruud, Audun, 2017. "A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 27-31.
    31. Borrás, Susana & Edler, Jakob, 2020. "The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems' transformation," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 65, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    32. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    33. Gavin Bridge & Ludger Gailing, 2020. "New energy spaces: Towards a geographical political economy of energy transition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1037-1050, September.
    34. Beata Farkas, 2011. "The Central and Eastern European model of capitalism," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 15-34.
    35. Eric Magnin, 2018. "Varieties of Capitalism and Sustainable Development: Institutional Complementarity Dynamics or Radical Change in the Hierarchy of Institutions?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(4), pages 1143-1158, October.
    36. Jochen Markard, 2018. "The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 628-633, August.
    37. Stefan Ćetković & Aron Buzogány, 2016. "Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 642-657, July.
    38. Rohe, Sebastian & Chlebna, Camilla, 2021. "A spatial perspective on the legitimacy of a technological innovation system: Regional differences in onshore wind energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    39. Guri Bang & Bård Lahn, 2020. "From oil as welfare to oil as risk? Norwegian petroleum resource governance and climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 997-1009, September.
    40. Schot, Johan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2018. "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1554-1567.
    41. Ćetković, Stefan & Buzogány, Aron, 2020. "Between markets, politics and path-dependence: Explaining the growth of solar and wind power in six Central and Eastern European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    42. Luis Carvalho & Mario Vale, 2018. "Biotech by Bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1801, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2018.
    43. Markard, Jochen & Raven, Rob & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 955-967.
    44. Eric Magnin, 2018. "Varieties of Capitalism and Sustainable Development: Institutional Complementarity Dynamics or Radical Change in the Hierarchy of Institutions?," Post-Print hal-03665383, HAL.
    45. Elena Shadrina, 2020. "Non-Hydropower Renewable Energy in Central Asia: Assessment of Deployment Status and Analysis of Underlying Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    46. Hall, Stephen & Roelich, Katy E. & Davis, Mark E. & Holstenkamp, Lars, 2018. "Finance and justice in low-carbon energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 772-780.
    47. Fuenfschilling, Lea & Binz, Christian, 2018. "Global socio-technical regimes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 735-749.
    48. Hall, Peter A. & Taylor, Rosemary C. R., 1996. "Political science and the three new institutionalisms," MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    49. Jonas Meckling & Jonas Nahm, 2018. "When do states disrupt industries? Electric cars and the politics of innovation," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 505-529, July.
    50. Gilbert, Brett Anitra & Campbell, Joanna Tochman, 2015. "The geographic origins of radical technological paradigms: A configurational study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 311-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sirma Altun & Ceren Ergenc, 2023. "The EU and China in the global climate regime: a dialectical collaboration-competition relationship," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 437-457, September.
    2. Armin Razmjoo & Arezoo Ghazanfari & Poul Alberg Østergaard & Mehdi Jahangiri & Andreas Sumper & Sahar Ahmadzadeh & Reza Eslamipoor, 2024. "Moving Toward the Expansion of Energy Storage Systems in Renewable Energy Systems—A Techno-Institutional Investigation with Artificial Intelligence Consideration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanger, Laur & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Noorkõiv, Martin, 2020. "Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    2. Edler, Jakob & Köhler, Jonathan Hugh & Wydra, Sven & Salas-Gironés, Edgar & Schiller, Katharina & Braun, Annette, 2021. "Dimensions of systems and transformations: Towards an integrated framework for system transformations," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S03/2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. Hansmeier Hendrik & Kroll Henning, 2024. "The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: A systematic comparison," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 68(2), pages 125-143.
    4. Veldhuizen, Caroline, 2020. "Smart Specialisation as a transition management framework: Driving sustainability-focused regional innovation policy?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    5. Jonas Heiberg & Christian Binz & Bernhard Truffer, 2020. "The Geography of Technology Legitimation. How multi-scalar legitimation processes matter for path creation in emerging industries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2034, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    6. Dierk Bauknecht & Allan Dahl Andersen & Karoline Dunne, 2020. "Challenges for electricity network governance in Energy transitions: Insights from Norway," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20200115, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    7. Veldhuizen, Caroline, 2021. "Conceptualising the foundations of sustainability focused innovation policy: From constructivism to holism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    8. Jonas Heiberg & Bernhard Truffer, 2021. "The emergence of a global innovation system – a case study from the water sector," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(09), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    9. Simon Baumgartinger-Seiringer & David Doloreux & Richard Shearmur & Michaela Trippl, 2021. "When history does not matter? The rise of Quebec’s wine industry," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_05, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Robert Hassink & Arne Isaksen & Michaela Trippl, 2019. "Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(11), pages 1636-1645, November.
    11. Grillitsch, Markus & Hansen, Teis & Madsen, Stine, 2020. "How novel is Transformative Innovation Policy?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/8, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    12. Anastasia O. Ljovkina & David L. Dusseault & Olga V. Zaharova & Yury Klochkov, 2019. "Managing Innovation Resources in Accordance with Sustainable Development Ethics: Typological Analysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Simon Baumgartinger-Seiringer & Lea Fuenfschilling & Johan Miörner & Michaela Trippl, 2020. "Reconsidering structural conditions: Institutional infrastructure for innovation-based industrial path renewal," PEGIS geo-disc-2020_01, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    14. Carbajo, Ruth & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2021. "Researchers perception regarding socio-technical approaches implementation in their own research. Thermal energy storage researchers as example," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Alexandra Frangenheim & Michaela Trippl & Camilla Chlebna, 2018. "Beyond the 'single path view': Inter-path relationships in regional contexts," PEGIS geo-disc-2018_06, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    16. Arne Isaksen & Emelie Langemyr Eriksen & Jan Ole Rypestøl, 2020. "Regional industrial restructuring: Asset modification and alignment for digitalization," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 1454-1470, December.
    17. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Loeber, Anne M.C. & Grin, John, 2021. "Politics of complexity: Conceptualizing agency, power and powering in the transitional dynamics of complex adaptive systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    18. Robinson, Douglas K. R. & Borrás, Susana & Boon, Wouter P.C., 2024. "Reimagining Diffusion Eight building blocks for reconceptualising the generalisation of innovation into society," Papers in Innovation Studies 2024/17, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    19. Romero Goyeneche, Oscar Yandy & Ramirez, Matias & Schot, Johan & Arroyave, Felber, 2022. "Mobilizing the transformative power of research for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    20. Artur Santoalha & Ron Boschma, 2021. "Diversifying in green technologies in European regions: does political support matter?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 182-195, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122003380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.