IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v11y2018i2p275-295..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions

Author

Listed:
  • Luís Carvalho
  • Mário Vale

Abstract

This article develops a framework to understand new industrial path development in peripheral regions based on notions of ‘bricolage’ and ‘institutional relatedness’. While the first stresses the agency of (heterogeneous) actors’ resourcefulness and strategic improvisation co-shaping new industrial paths, the latter highlights the transposition of related institutional settings within regions to amplify (or to limit) the search space for new industries. These arguments are used in conjunction to explain the development of an unlikely biotechnology path in the Portuguese Centro region, analysed since its emergence and over a period of more than 10 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Luís Carvalho & Mário Vale, 2018. "Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(2), pages 275-295.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:2:p:275-295.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsy009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Frangenheim & Michaela Trippl & Camilla Chlebna, 2018. "Beyond the 'single path view': Inter-path relationships in regional contexts," PEGIS geo-disc-2018_06, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    2. Jonas Heiberg & Bernhard Truffer, 2021. "The emergence of a global innovation system – a case study from the water sector," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(09), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    3. Mads Bruun Ingstrup & Max-Peter Menzel, 2019. "The emergence of relatedness between industries: The example of offshore oil and gas and offshore wind energy in Esbjerg, Denmark," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_15, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Ellen Loots & Miguel Neiva & Luís Carvalho & Mariangela Lavanga, 2021. "The entrepreneurial ecosystem of cultural and creative industries in Porto: A sub‐ecosystem approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 641-662, June.
    5. Arne Isaksen & Michaela Trippl & Nina Kyllingstad & Jan Ole Rypestøl, 2019. "Digital transformation of regional industries: The link between new path development, innovation system dynamics and asset modification," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_02, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    6. Koen Frenken & Frank Neffke & Alje van Dam, 2023. "Capabilities, institutions and regional economic development: a proposed synthesis," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 405-416.
    7. Simon Baumgartinger-Seiringer & David Doloreux & Richard Shearmur & Michaela Trippl, 2021. "When history does not matter? The rise of Quebec’s wine industry," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_05, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    8. Robert Hassink & Arne Isaksen & Michaela Trippl, 2019. "Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(11), pages 1636-1645, November.
    9. Mads Bruun Ingstrup & Max-Peter Menzel, 2019. "The emergence of relatedness between industries: The example of offshore oil and gas and offshore wind energy in Esbjerg, Denmark," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1929, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2019.
    10. Danny Mackinnon & Stuart Dawley & Andy Pike & Andrew Cumbers, 2018. "Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1825, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2018.
    11. Grillitsch, Markus & Sotarauta, Markku & Asheim, Björn & Fitjar, Rune Dahl & Haus-Reve, Silje & Kolehmainen, Jari & Kurikka, Heli & Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Martynovich, Mikhail & Monteilhet, Skirmante, 2022. "Agency and Economic Change in Regions: Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to identify Routes to New Path Development," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/5, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    12. Arne Isaksen & Emelie Langemyr Eriksen & Jan Ole Rypestøl, 2020. "Regional industrial restructuring: Asset modification and alignment for digitalization," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 1454-1470, December.
    13. Robert Huggins & Max Munday & Piers Thompson & Chen Xu, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems, agency and regional development: Emergence and new path creation in the Cardiff city region," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(6), pages 538-561, September.
    14. Han Chu & Robert Hassink, 2023. "Advancing spatial ontology in evolutionary economic geography," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 391-404.
    15. Johan Miörner & Bernhard Truffer & Christian Binz & Jonas Heiberg & Xiao-Shan Yap, 2022. "Guidebook for applying the Socio-Technical Configuration Analysis method," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2022(11), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    16. Simon Baumgartinger-Seiringer & Lea Fuenfschilling & Johan Miörner & Michaela Trippl, 2020. "Reconsidering structural conditions: Institutional infrastructure for innovation-based industrial path renewal," PEGIS geo-disc-2020_01, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    17. John Hogan & Michael Howlett & Mary Murphy, 2022. "Re-thinking the coronavirus pandemic as a policy punctuation: COVID-19 as a path-clearing policy accelerator [Punctuating the equilibrium: An application of policy theory to COVID-19]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(1), pages 40-52.
    18. Simón Sánchez‐Moral & Mário Vale & Alfonso Arellano, 2022. "Skill‐Relatedness and Regional Economic Development in Spain during the International Crisis and the Post‐Crisis Period," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(3), pages 573-602, June.
    19. Jonas Heiberg & Christian Binz & Bernhard Truffer, 2020. "The Geography of Technology Legitimation. How multi-scalar legitimation processes matter for path creation in emerging industries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2034, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    20. Loewen, Bradley, 2022. "Revitalizing varieties of capitalism for sustainability transitions research: Review, critique and way forward," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:2:p:275-295.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.