IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v155y2022ics136403212101176x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid simulation framework for the production management of an ethanol biorefinery

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Sojung
  • Kim, Sumin

Abstract

To make ethanol cost-competitive with gasoline, it is critical to devise a cost-effective production plan for ethanol refineries. However, unlike with petroleum refineries, the managers of the corn-based ethanol refineries are faced with multiple challenges. Particularly, the refineries should have a consistent production rate despite the uncertain yield of feedstock production that results from a dynamic environment, including climate change. In this study, a hybrid simulation framework was developed for operating biofuel refineries. The framework consisted of two major simulation platforms: (1) Agricultural Land Management Alternative with Numerical Assessment Criteria (ALMANAC) for yield estimation of feedstock considering dynamic environmental factors and (2) simulation-based optimization with agent-based simulation (ABS) to identify the optimal production plan in terms of operational cost based on yield and relevant parameters given by ALMANAC. In ABS, eight major operations (e.g., milling, cooking, liquefaction, and fermentation) of a refinery were modeled via AnyLogic® ABS software to accurately compute operational costs. We used a geographic information system (GIS) map to compute transportation costs between feedstock farms, refineries, and consumers’ facilities. The proposed framework was demonstrated using real data of feedstock and ethanol production in Tazewell County, Illinois, U.S. The experiments identified that the ethanol production planning without considering feedstock loss could cause overproduction at a refinery. The daily overproduction costs with 28% dry matter and 45% dry matter are 23.56% and 14.07% of their total operational costs, respectively. The framework will provide a reliable and practical ethanol production plan considering feedstock supply under dynamic environmental factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Sojung & Kim, Sumin, 2022. "Hybrid simulation framework for the production management of an ethanol biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:155:y:2022:i:c:s136403212101176x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212101176X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schnitkey, Gary, 2018. "Exceptional 2018 Corn and Soybean Yields and Budgeting for 2019," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 8, September.
    2. Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dehhaghi, Mona & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Karimi, Keikhosro & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2020. "Conversion of residues from agro-food industry into bioethanol in Iran: An under-valued biofuel additive to phase out MTBE in gasoline," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 699-710.
    3. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Khounani, Zahra & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Amiri, Hamid & Lam, Su Shiung & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of bioenergy systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Yijia Li & Ruiqing Miao & Madhu Khanna, 2019. "Effects of Ethanol Plant Proximity and Crop Prices on Land-Use Change in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(2), pages 467-491.
    5. Detlef Vuuren & Elke Stehfest & Michel Elzen & Tom Kram & Jasper Vliet & Sebastiaan Deetman & Morna Isaac & Kees Klein Goldewijk & Andries Hof & Angelica Mendoza Beltran & Rineke Oostenrijk & Bas Ruij, 2011. "RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 95-116, November.
    6. Sateesh Kagale & Chushin Koh & John Nixon & Venkatesh Bollina & Wayne E. Clarke & Reetu Tuteja & Charles Spillane & Stephen J. Robinson & Matthew G. Links & Carling Clarke & Erin E. Higgins & Terry Hu, 2014. "The emerging biofuel crop Camelina sativa retains a highly undifferentiated hexaploid genome structure," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Allison Thomson & Katherine Calvin & Steven Smith & G. Kyle & April Volke & Pralit Patel & Sabrina Delgado-Arias & Ben Bond-Lamberty & Marshall Wise & Leon Clarke & James Edmonds, 2011. "RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 77-94, November.
    8. Jonas Zetterholm & Elina Bryngemark & Johan Ahlström & Patrik Söderholm & Simon Harvey & Elisabeth Wetterlund, 2020. "Economic Evaluation of Large-Scale Biorefinery Deployment: A Framework Integrating Dynamic Biomass Market and Techno-Economic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Demirbas, M. Fatih, 2011. "Biofuels from algae for sustainable development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3473-3480.
    10. Donald Erlenkotter, 1990. "Ford Whitman Harris and the Economic Order Quantity Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 937-946, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Yiyong & Newth, David & Finnigan, John & Gunasekera, Don, 2015. "A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 381-395.
    2. Fujimori, Shinichiro & Dai, Hancheng & Masui, Toshihiko & Matsuoka, Yuzuru, 2016. "Global energy model hindcasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 293-301.
    3. Yan Lu & Haikun Wang & Qin’geng Wang & Yanyan Zhang & Yiyong Yu & Yu Qian, 2017. "Global anthropogenic heat emissions from energy consumption, 1965–2100," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 459-468, December.
    4. Amouzou, Kokou Adambounou & Naab, Jesse B. & Lamers, John P.A. & Borgemeister, Christian & Becker, Mathias & Vlek, Paul L.G., 2018. "CROPGRO-Cotton model for determining climate change impacts on yield, water- and N- use efficiencies of cotton in the Dry Savanna of West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 85-96.
    5. Dandan Zhao & Hong S. He & Wen J. Wang & Lei Wang & Haibo Du & Kai Liu & Shengwei Zong, 2018. "Predicting Wetland Distribution Changes under Climate Change and Human Activities in a Mid- and High-Latitude Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Favero, Alice & Massetti, Emanuele, 2014. "Trade of woody biomass for electricity generation under climate mitigation policy," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 166-190.
    7. Ritchie, Justin & Dowlatabadi, Hadi, 2017. "The 1000 GtC coal question: Are cases of vastly expanded future coal combustion still plausible?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 16-31.
    8. Zhou, Sheng & Kyle, G. Page & Yu, Sha & Clarke, Leon E. & Eom, Jiyong & Luckow, Patrick & Chaturvedi, Vaibhav & Zhang, Xiliang & Edmonds, James A., 2013. "Energy use and CO2 emissions of China's industrial sector from a global perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 284-294.
    9. Fujimori, Shinichiro & Masui, Toshihiko & Matsuoka, Yuzuru, 2014. "Development of a global computable general equilibrium model coupled with detailed energy end-use technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 296-306.
    10. Zhihui Li & Xiangzheng Deng & Xi Chu & Gui Jin & Wei Qi, 2019. "An Outlook on the Biomass Energy Development Out to 2100 in China," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 1359-1377, December.
    11. Silva Herran, Diego & Tachiiri, Kaoru & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi, 2019. "Global energy system transformations in mitigation scenarios considering climate uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 119-131.
    12. Zhou, Sheng & Wang, Yu & Zhou, Yuyu & Clarke, Leon E. & Edmonds, James A., 2018. "Roles of wind and solar energy in China’s power sector: Implications of intermittency constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 22-30.
    13. Nathalie Spittler & Ganna Gladkykh & Arnaud Diemer & Brynhildur Davidsdottir, 2019. "Understanding the Current Energy Paradigm and Energy System Models for More Sustainable Energy System Development," Post-Print hal-02127724, HAL.
    14. Filimonau, Viachaslau & Högström, Michaela, 2017. "The attitudes of UK tourists to the use of biofuels in civil aviation: An exploratory study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 84-94.
    15. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Ribeiro, Lauro André & Silva, Patrícia Pereira da, 2013. "Surveying techno-economic indicators of microalgae biofuel technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 89-96.
    17. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 127-138, January.
    18. Céline Guivarch, 2012. "2°C or not 2°C?," Post-Print halshs-00757079, HAL.
    19. Vladimir F. Krapivin & Costas A. Varotsos & Vladimir Yu. Soldatov, 2017. "The Earth’s Population Can Reach 14 Billion in the 23rd Century without Significant Adverse Effects on Survivability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Michels-Brito, Adriane & Rodriguez, Daniel Andrés & Cruz Junior, Wellington Luís & Nildo de Souza Vianna, João, 2021. "The climate change potential effects on the run-of-river plant and the environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:155:y:2022:i:c:s136403212101176x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.