IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v148y2021ics1364032121006079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A chance-constrained small modular reactor siting model -- a case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Bin
  • Huang, Guohe
  • Chen, Jiapei
  • Zhang, Xiaoyue
  • Zhao, Kai

Abstract

In this study, a chance-constrained small modular reactor siting (CCSS) model has been first proposed for planning regional electric power systems in the Province of Saskatchewan under the pressure of greenhouse gas emission mitigation. Through incorporating three programming methods (interval linear programming, chance-constrained programming, and mixed-integer programming) in an optimization framework, the CCSS model could effectively deal with multiple uncertainties expressed as probability distribution and intervals in constraints and objectives. Since locations of retired coal-fired power stations have been proposed as new sites for small modular reactor (SMR), this model could provide the construction planning for SMR in terms of its sizes and sites. Various solutions to power generation and capacity expansion with different risk levels were obtained under the objective of minimal system costs. Results are helpful for identifying optimized strategies to increase the proportion of renewable energy under emission constraints. In addition, model without introducing the technology of SMR has been comprehensively compared with the CCSS model to recognise the effects of SMR on system costs and greenhouse gas emissions. Results indicate that the CCSS model is effective for supporting long-term clean and renewable energy utilization as well as emission reduction policy formulation in Saskatchewan.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Bin & Huang, Guohe & Chen, Jiapei & Zhang, Xiaoyue & Zhao, Kai, 2021. "A chance-constrained small modular reactor siting model -- a case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:148:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121006079
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121006079
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Yang, Z.F. & Lin, Q.G. & Tan, Q., 2009. "Community-scale renewable energy systems planning under uncertainty--An interval chance-constrained programming approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 721-735, May.
    2. WorldFish, 2019. "Annual Report 2018," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40826, April.
    3. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    4. Mignacca, B. & Locatelli, G., 2020. "Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors: A systematic review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Zhou, Xiong & Huang, Guohe & Zhu, Hua & Chen, Jiapei & Xu, Jinliang, 2015. "Chance-constrained two-stage fractional optimization for planning regional energy systems in British Columbia, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 663-677.
    6. Alonso, Gustavo & Bilbao, Sama & Valle, Edmundo del, 2016. "Economic competitiveness of small modular reactors versus coal and combined cycle plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 867-879.
    7. Chen, J.P. & Huang, G. & Baetz, B.W. & Lin, Q.G. & Dong, C. & Cai, Y.P., 2018. "Integrated inexact energy systems planning under climate change: A case study of Yukon Territory, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 493-504.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Bin & Huang, Guohe & Chen, Leian & Liu, Lirong & Zhao, Kai, 2024. "Factorial optimization-driven input-output analysis for socio-economic and environmental effects of GHG emission reduction in electric power systems – A Canadian case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Chuyin & Huang, Guohe & Xie, Yulei, 2021. "Systematic evaluation for hydropower exploitation rationality in hydro-dominant area: A case study of Sichuan Province, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1096-1111.
    2. Sander Claeys & Marta Vanin & Frederik Geth & Geert Deconinck, 2021. "Applications of optimization models for electricity distribution networks," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), September.
    3. Song, Tangnyu & Huang, Guohe & Zhou, Xiong & Wang, Xiuquan, 2018. "An inexact two-stage fractional energy systems planning model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 275-289.
    4. Liu, Yanyan & Huang, Guohe & Chen, Jiapei & Zhang, Xiaoyue & Zheng, Xiaogui & Zhai, Mengyu, 2022. "Development of an optimization-aided small modular reactor siting model – A case study of Saskatchewan, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    5. Elaheh Shobeiri & Filippo Genco & Daniel Hoornweg & Akira Tokuhiro, 2023. "Small Modular Reactor Deployment and Obstacles to Be Overcome," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Roy, Anindita & Kedare, Shireesh B. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2010. "Optimum sizing of wind-battery systems incorporating resource uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2712-2727, August.
    7. Kang, Seong Woo & Yim, Man-Sung, 2023. "Coupled system model analysis for a small modular reactor cogeneration (combined heat and power) application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    8. Guan, Panbo & Huang, Guohe & Wu, Chuanbao & Wang, Linrui & Li, Chaoci & Wang, Yuanyi, 2019. "Analysis of emission taxes levying on regional electric power structure adjustment with an inexact optimization model - A case study of Zibo, China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Jin, L. & Huang, G.H. & Fan, Y.R. & Wang, L. & Wu, T., 2015. "A pseudo-optimal inexact stochastic interval T2 fuzzy sets approach for energy and environmental systems planning under uncertainty: A case study for Xiamen City of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 71-90.
    10. Aman Gupta & Piyush Sabharwall & Paul D. Armatis & Brian M. Fronk & Vivek Utgikar, 2022. "Coupling Chemical Heat Pump with Nuclear Reactor for Temperature Amplification by Delivering Process Heat and Electricity: A Techno-Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Azarnoosh Kafi & Behrouz Daneshian & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2021. "Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 41-59.
    12. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    13. Shouman, Enas R. & El Shenawy, E.T. & Khattab, N.M., 2016. "Market financial analysis and cost performance for photovoltaic technology through international and national perspective with case study for Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 540-549.
    14. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    15. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Chen, X., 2011. "An interval-valued minimax-regret analysis approach for the identification of optimal greenhouse-gas abatement strategies under uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 4313-4324, July.
    16. Hermann Held, 2019. "Cost Risk Analysis: Dynamically Consistent Decision-Making under Climate Targets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(1), pages 247-261, January.
    17. Shen, Feifei & Zhao, Liang & Wang, Meihong & Du, Wenli & Qian, Feng, 2022. "Data-driven adaptive robust optimization for energy systems in ethylene plant under demand uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    18. Wu, Desheng (Dash) & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2010. "Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1679-1688, December.
    19. Odetayo, Babatunde & MacCormack, John & Rosehart, William D. & Zareipour, Hamidreza, 2017. "A sequential planning approach for Distributed generation and natural gas networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 428-437.
    20. Wang, S. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "An integrated approach for water resources decision making under interactive and compound uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 32-40.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:148:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121006079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.