IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v203y2024ics1364032124004696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic potential and barriers of small modular reactors in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Van Hee, Nick
  • Peremans, Herbert
  • Nimmegeers, Philippe

Abstract

To achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, as outlined in the European Green Deal, nuclear power is expected to double between 2020 and 2050, mainly due to its low-carbon baseload capacity. Small modular reactors, new nuclear reactors designed to generate up to 300 MW of electricity, could help achieve this goal. Small modular reactors have unique advantages over existing large reactors, such as modularization, learning and co-location economics. However, these small modular reactors should also be economically viable. This review therefore focuses on the costs of small modular reactors. This review found an average capital cost of €7.031/kW and an average levelized cost of electricity of 85 €/MWh for small modular reactors, while capital costs were found to be on average 41 % higher than for the large reactors. Carbon and gas prices are not included in this cost estimate, yet these volatile prices also affect small modular reactor costs. However, as the absolute cost is lower, the financial risk is lower for small modular reactors. The importance of regulations, discount rates, country and project specifications and public acceptance are also considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Hee, Nick & Peremans, Herbert & Nimmegeers, Philippe, 2024. "Economic potential and barriers of small modular reactors in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004696
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124004696
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.