IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v305y2022ics0306261921011892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an optimization-aided small modular reactor siting model – A case study of Saskatchewan, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yanyan
  • Huang, Guohe
  • Chen, Jiapei
  • Zhang, Xiaoyue
  • Zheng, Xiaogui
  • Zhai, Mengyu

Abstract

As an emerging clean technology, the replacement of coal plants and the integration with renewable power generation are two appealing options for the deployment of SMRs in the power system. However, both these applications and SMR siting issues for power systems have multiple complexities that have been difficult to be considered in past studies. Accordingly, an optimization-aided small modular reactor siting (OASS) model is initiated in this study to support decisions of siting, sizing, and timing for small modular reactor (SMR) development. The proposed OASS model is specialized for obtaining possible SMRs siting schemes, wind-SMRs combination schemes, and power system transition schemes with coal plant closure and SMRs deployment. This research initiates the application of an optimization-based modelling approach to tackle SMRs site selection issues for Saskatchewan, Canada. The results disclose that electricity imports and natural gas power will fill the electricity demand gap in Saskatchewan’s power system in the short term. Results obtained from this model can also identify optimized patterns of SMRs and wind farms deployment and siting in Saskatchewan. Power stations with large capacity and independent transmission grid will become the primary choice in the SMRs and wind farms site selection process. Such patterns and alternatives would enable decision-makers obtain optimized energy structure by introducing SMR reflecting trade-offs between overall system costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from both economic and environmental perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yanyan & Huang, Guohe & Chen, Jiapei & Zhang, Xiaoyue & Zheng, Xiaogui & Zhai, Mengyu, 2022. "Development of an optimization-aided small modular reactor siting model – A case study of Saskatchewan, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:305:y:2022:i:c:s0306261921011892
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921011892
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vera Danilina & Alexander Grigoriev, 2020. "Information Provision in Environmental Policy Design," Post-Print hal-02110860, HAL.
    2. Maqsood, Imran & Huang, Guo H. & Scott Yeomans, Julian, 2005. "An interval-parameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 208-225, November.
    3. Zhou, Zhe & Zhang, Jianyun & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng & Georgiadis, Michael C. & Pistikopoulos, Efstratios N., 2013. "A two-stage stochastic programming model for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 135-144.
    4. Mignacca, B. & Locatelli, G., 2020. "Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors: A systematic review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Richards, Garrett & Noble, Bram & Belcher, Ken, 2012. "Barriers to renewable energy development: A case study of large-scale wind energy in Saskatchewan, Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 691-698.
    6. Nie, S. & Li, Y.P. & Liu, J. & Huang, Charley Z., 2017. "Risk management of energy system for identifying optimal power mix with financial-cost minimization and environmental-impact mitigation under uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 313-329.
    7. Locatelli, Giorgio & Mancini, Mauro, 2011. "Large and small baseload power plants: Drivers to define the optimal portfolios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7762-7775.
    8. Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula & Schumann, Diana & Vögele, Stefan & Biß, Klaus Hendrik & Shamon, Hawal & Markewitz, Peter & Többen, Johannes & Gillessen, Bastian & Gotzens, Fabian & Ernst, Anna, 2017. "Integrated assessment of a phase-out of coal-fired power plants in Germany," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 285-305.
    9. Keles, Dogan & Yilmaz, Hasan Ümitcan, 2020. "Decarbonisation through coal phase-out in Germany and Europe — Impact on Emissions, electricity prices and power production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula & Markewitz, Peter, 2017. "Long-term impacts of a coal phase-out in Germany as part of a greenhouse gas mitigation strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 234-246.
    11. Vujić, Jasmina & Bergmann, Ryan M. & Škoda, Radek & Miletić, Marija, 2012. "Small modular reactors: Simpler, safer, cheaper?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 288-295.
    12. Zhou, Xiong & Huang, Guohe & Zhu, Hua & Chen, Jiapei & Xu, Jinliang, 2015. "Chance-constrained two-stage fractional optimization for planning regional energy systems in British Columbia, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 663-677.
    13. Shropshire, David & Purvins, Arturs & Papaioannou, Ioulia & Maschio, Isabella, 2012. "Benefits and cost implications from integrating small flexible nuclear reactors with off-shore wind farms in a virtual power plant," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 558-573.
    14. Johnson, Nils & Krey, Volker & McCollum, David L. & Rao, Shilpa & Riahi, Keywan & Rogelj, Joeri, 2015. "Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 89-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xie, Wanni & Atherton, John & Bai, Jiaru & Farazi, Feroz & Mosbach, Sebastian & Akroyd, Jethro & Kraft, Markus, 2024. "A nuclear future? Small Modular Reactors in a carbon tax-driven transition to clean energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anke, Carl-Philipp & Hobbie, Hannes & Schreiber, Steffi & Möst, Dominik, 2020. "Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: Interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Klöckner, Kai & Letmathe, Peter, 2020. "Is the coherence of coal phase-out and electrolytic hydrogen production the golden path to effective decarbonisation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Okunlola, Ayodeji & Davis, Matthew & Kumar, Amit, 2023. "Assessing the cost competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen production from small modular nuclear reactor-based power plants: A price-following perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    4. Osorio, Sebastian & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Pahle, Michael & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Popov, Dimityr & Borissova, Ana, 2017. "Innovative configuration of a hybrid nuclear-solar tower power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 736-746.
    6. Erwan Hermawan & Usman Sudjadi, 2022. "Integrated Nuclear-Renewable Energy System for Industrialization in West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia: Economic, Potential Site, and Policy Recommendation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 146-159, July.
    7. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2017. "Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 602-615.
    8. Hauser, Philipp & Heinrichs, Heidi U. & Gillessen, Bastian & Müller, Theresa, 2018. "Implications of diversification strategies in the European natural gas market for the German energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 442-454.
    9. Nian, Victor & Mignacca, Benito & Locatelli, Giorgio, 2022. "Policies toward net-zero: Benchmarking the economic competitiveness of nuclear against wind and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    10. Weber, Juliane & Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula & Gillessen, Bastian & Schumann, Diana & Hörsch, Jonas & Brown, Tom & Witthaut, Dirk, 2019. "Counter-intuitive behaviour of energy system models under CO2 caps and prices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 22-30.
    11. Ji, L. & Niu, D.X. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "An inexact two-stage stochastic robust programming for residential micro-grid management-based on random demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 186-199.
    12. Elaheh Shobeiri & Filippo Genco & Daniel Hoornweg & Akira Tokuhiro, 2023. "Small Modular Reactor Deployment and Obstacles to Be Overcome," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Sebastian Osorio & Robert C. Pietzcker & Michael Pahle & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2018. "How to Deal with the Risks of Phasing out Coal in Germany through National Carbon Pricing," CESifo Working Paper Series 7438, CESifo.
    14. Kang-Heon Lee & Min-Gil Kim & Jeong Ik Lee & Phill-Seung Lee, 2015. "Recent Advances in Ocean Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Dong, Zhe & Liu, Miao & Zhang, Zuoyi & Dong, Yujie & Huang, Xiaojin, 2019. "Automatic generation control for the flexible operation of multimodular high temperature gas-cooled reactor plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 11-31.
    16. Ernst, Anna & Biß, Klaus H. & Shamon, Hawal & Schumann, Diana & Heinrichs, Heidi U., 2018. "Benefits and challenges of participatory methods in qualitative energy scenario development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 245-257.
    17. Mignacca, Benito & Locatelli, Giorgio & Sainati, Tristano, 2020. "Deeds not words: Barriers and remedies for Small Modular nuclear Reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Xie, Y.L. & Xia, D.H. & Ji, L. & Zhou, W.N. & Huang, G.H., 2017. "An inexact cost-risk balanced model for regional energy structure adjustment management and resources environmental effect analysis-a case study of Shandong province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 374-391.
    19. Luo, Bin & Huang, Guohe & Chen, Jiapei & Zhang, Xiaoyue & Zhao, Kai, 2021. "A chance-constrained small modular reactor siting model -- a case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Haneklaus, Nils & Qvist, Staffan & Gładysz, Paweł & Bartela, Łukasz, 2023. "Why coal-fired power plants should get nuclear-ready," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:305:y:2022:i:c:s0306261921011892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.