IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v12y2008i5p1465-1475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review on risk-constrained hydropower scheduling in deregulated power market

Author

Listed:
  • Hongling, Liu
  • Chuanwen, Jiang
  • Yan, Zhang

Abstract

In deregulated power market, hydro producer has in principle no other objective than to produce electricity and sell with maximum profit with lower market risk. Attention must focus on profit uncertainty caused by uncertainty in spot prices and reservoir inflow. The purpose of this review is to assess the state-of-the-art in hydropower operations considering profit risk under uncertainty and consider future directions for additional research and application. Physical and financial tools to hedge risk in bilateral market and risk-assessment methods are all discussed in detail. Furthermore, production resources can also be used to manage risk to a certain extent. This concept, when be integrated with variety of risk-management methods under stochastic optimal framework, has operational significance for hydro producer participating in electricity market.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongling, Liu & Chuanwen, Jiang & Yan, Zhang, 2008. "A review on risk-constrained hydropower scheduling in deregulated power market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 1465-1475, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:12:y:2008:i:5:p:1465-1475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364-0321(07)00027-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jitka Dupačová & Giorgio Consigli & Stein Wallace, 2000. "Scenarios for Multistage Stochastic Programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 25-53, December.
    2. Deng, S.J. & Oren, S.S., 2006. "Electricity derivatives and risk management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 940-953.
    3. L. Reis & G. Walters & D. Savic & F. Chaudhry, 2005. "Multi-Reservoir Operation Planning Using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Linear Programming (GA-LP): An Alternative Stochastic Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 19(6), pages 831-848, December.
    4. Matthias Nowak & Werner Römisch, 2000. "Stochastic Lagrangian Relaxation Applied to Power Scheduling in a Hydro-Thermal System under Uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 251-272, December.
    5. Kjetil Høyland & Stein W. Wallace, 2001. "Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 295-307, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boubaker, K., 2012. "A review on renewable energy conceptual perspectives in North Africa using a polynomial optimization scheme," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4298-4302.
    2. de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo, 2016. "Stochastic hydro-thermal scheduling optimization: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 382-395.
    3. Li, Gong & Shi, Jing & Qu, Xiuli, 2011. "Modeling methods for GenCo bidding strategy optimization in the liberalized electricity spot market–A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4686-4700.
    4. Baños, R. & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. & Montoya, F.G. & Gil, C. & Alcayde, A. & Gómez, J., 2011. "Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1753-1766, May.
    5. Catalão, J.P.S. & Pousinho, H.M.I. & Contreras, J., 2012. "Optimal hydro scheduling and offering strategies considering price uncertainty and risk management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 237-244.
    6. Mengfei Xie & Suzhen Feng & Jinwen Wang & Maolin Zhang & Cheng Chen, 2022. "Impacts of Yield and Seasonal Prices on the Operation of Lancang Cascaded Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Li, Xiao & Liu, Pan & Feng, Maoyuan & Jordaan, Sarah M. & Cheng, Lei & Ming, Bo & Chen, Jie & Xie, Kang & Liu, Weibo, 2024. "Energy transition paradox: Solar and wind growth can hinder decarbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. René Aïd, 2008. "Long-term risk management for utility companies: the next challenges," Working Papers hal-00409030, HAL.
    9. Ali Thaeer Hammid & Omar I. Awad & Mohd Herwan Sulaiman & Saraswathy Shamini Gunasekaran & Salama A. Mostafa & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Bashar Ahmad Khalaf & Yasir Amer Al-Jawhar & Raed Abdulkareem A, 2020. "A Review of Optimization Algorithms in Solving Hydro Generation Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Pérez-Díaz, Juan I. & Chazarra, M. & García-González, J. & Cavazzini, G. & Stoppato, A., 2015. "Trends and challenges in the operation of pumped-storage hydropower plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 767-784.
    11. Machado, Bruno Goulart F. & Bhagwat, Pradyumna C., 2020. "The impact of the generation mix on the current regulatory framework for hydropower remuneration in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    12. Gupta, Akshita & Kumar, Arun & Khatod, Dheeraj Kumar, 2019. "Optimized scheduling of hydropower with increase in solar and wind installations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 716-732.
    13. Zimmermann, Florian & Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "Cross-border effects of capacity remuneration mechanisms: The Swiss case," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 35, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    14. Ostadi, Bakhtiar & Motamedi Sedeh, Omid & Husseinzadeh Kashan, Ali, 2020. "Risk-based optimal bidding patterns in the deregulated power market using extended Markowitz model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Liu, Pei-chen Barry & Hansen, Mark & Mukherjee, Avijit, 2008. "Scenario-based air traffic flow management: From theory to practice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(7-8), pages 685-702, August.
    3. Gulpinar, Nalan & Rustem, Berc & Settergren, Reuben, 2004. "Simulation and optimization approaches to scenario tree generation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1291-1315, April.
    4. Murat Köksalan & Ceren Tuncer Şakar, 2016. "An interactive approach to stochastic programming-based portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 47-66, October.
    5. Morales, J.M. & Mínguez, R. & Conejo, A.J., 2010. "A methodology to generate statistically dependent wind speed scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 843-855, March.
    6. Suvrajeet Sen & Lihua Yu & Talat Genc, 2006. "A Stochastic Programming Approach to Power Portfolio Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 55-72, February.
    7. Staino, Alessandro & Russo, Emilio, 2015. "A moment-matching method to generate arbitrage-free scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 619-630.
    8. Zhao, Daping & Bai, Lin & Fang, Yong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Multi‐period portfolio selection with investor views based on scenario tree," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    9. Consiglio, Andrea & Carollo, Angelo & Zenios, Stavros A., 2014. "Generating Multi-factor Arbitrage-Free Scenario Trees with Global Optimization," Working Papers 13-35, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    10. Latorre, Jesus M & Cerisola, Santiago & Ramos, Andres, 2007. "Clustering algorithms for scenario tree generation: Application to natural hydro inflows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1339-1353, September.
    11. Consiglio, Andrea & De Giovanni, Domenico, 2008. "Evaluation of insurance products with guarantee in incomplete markets," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 332-342, February.
    12. Rocha, Paula & Kuhn, Daniel, 2012. "Multistage stochastic portfolio optimisation in deregulated electricity markets using linear decision rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 397-408.
    13. Anthony Papavasiliou & Shmuel S. Oren, 2013. "Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-592, June.
    14. Yonghan Feng & Sarah Ryan, 2016. "Solution sensitivity-based scenario reduction for stochastic unit commitment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 29-62, January.
    15. S C H Leung & K K Lai & W-L Ng & Y Wu, 2007. "A robust optimization model for production planning of perishable products," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(4), pages 413-422, April.
    16. Andrea Consiglio & Domenico De Giovanni, 2010. "Pricing the Option to Surrender in Incomplete Markets," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(4), pages 935-957, December.
    17. Topaloglou, Nikolas & Vladimirou, Hercules & Zenios, Stavros A., 2008. "A dynamic stochastic programming model for international portfolio management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1501-1524, March.
    18. Michal Kaut & Stein Wallace, 2011. "Shape-based scenario generation using copulas," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 181-199, April.
    19. Michal Kaut & Kjetil Midthun & Adrian Werner & Asgeir Tomasgard & Lars Hellemo & Marte Fodstad, 2014. "Multi-horizon stochastic programming," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 179-193, January.
    20. Boris Defourny & Damien Ernst & Louis Wehenkel, 2013. "Scenario Trees and Policy Selection for Multistage Stochastic Programming Using Machine Learning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 488-501, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:12:y:2008:i:5:p:1465-1475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.