IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v225y2024ics0960148124003240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A combined approach-based techno-economic-environmental multi-optimization of a hydrogen generation system through waste biomass air-steam gasification

Author

Listed:
  • Tavakoli, Navid
  • Khoshkenar, Payam
  • Pourfayaz, Fathollah

Abstract

In this study, a biomass air-steam gasification system for hydrogen production was simulated in Aspen Plus and validated using experimental studies. Sewage sludge was considered as the biomass feed. A combined approach including the combination of the NSGA-II algorithm, the response surface methodology (RSM) and TOPSIS decision-making method, was used to multi-optimize this hydrogen production system. To optimize the performance of the system, first, mathematical equations between equivalence ratio (ER), steam to biomass ratio (SBR), and gasifier temperature as the decision variables and the mole flow of H2 and CO2 and the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) as the objective functions were obtained by the RSM technique. To maximize the mole flow of H2 and minimize CO2 emission and LCOH, a multi-objective optimization using NSGA-II was conducted. The ER, SBR and gasifier temperature were analyzed in the range of 0.1–0.4, 0.2 to 2 and 600 °C–1000 °C, respectively. By employing the TOPSIS decision-making method, several optimum points were obtained by giving each of the decision variables a specific weight. The lowest LCOH was found to be 1.5 €/kg H2 at the ER of 0.103, SBR of 0.83, and gasification temperature of 956 °C.

Suggested Citation

  • Tavakoli, Navid & Khoshkenar, Payam & Pourfayaz, Fathollah, 2024. "A combined approach-based techno-economic-environmental multi-optimization of a hydrogen generation system through waste biomass air-steam gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:225:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124003240
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124003240
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. You, Huailiang & Han, Jitian & Liu, Yang & Chen, Changnian & Ge, Yi, 2020. "4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of a micro poly-generation system based on SOFC/MGT/MED and organic steam ejector refrigerator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Chen, Guan-Bang & Wu, Fang-Hsien & Lin, Sheng-Pin & Hsu, Yun-Ting & Lin, Ta-Hui, 2022. "A study of sewage sludge Co-gasification with waste shiitake substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Sadeghi, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zar, M. & Santarelli, M., 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of a novel syngas fed SOFC power plant using a downdraft gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 16-31.
    4. Fugang Zhu & Laihong Shen & Pengcheng Xu & Haoran Yuan & Ming Hu & Jingwei Qi & Yong Chen, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of an Improved Updraft Biomass Gasifier Based on Aspen Plus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Gao, Xiaoyan & Xu, Fei & Bao, Fubing & Tu, Chengxu & Zhang, Yaning & Wang, Yingying & Yang, Yang & Li, Bingxi, 2019. "Simulation and optimization of rice husk gasification using intrinsic reaction rate based CFD model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 611-620.
    6. Hren, Robert & Vujanović, Annamaria & Van Fan, Yee & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Krajnc, Damjan & Čuček, Lidija, 2023. "Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Roy, Dibyendu & Samanta, Samiran & Roy, Sumit & Smallbone, Andrew & Paul Roskilly, Anthony, 2023. "Fuel cell integrated carbon negative power generation from biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song, Hao & Xia, Jiageng & Hu, Qiang & Cheng, Wei & Yang, Yang & Chen, Hanping & Yang, Haiping, 2024. "Comprehensive experimental assessment of biomass steam gasification with different types: correlation and multiple linear regression analysis with feedstock characteristics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, Wenxing & Yu, Zeting & Bian, Feiyu & Wu, Haonan & Zhang, Kaifan & Ji, Shaobo & Cui, Bo, 2023. "Techno-economic-environmental analysis and optimization of biomass-based SOFC poly-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. Roy, Dibyendu & Samanta, Samiran & Roy, Sumit & Smallbone, Andrew & Roskilly, Anthony Paul, 2023. "Multi-objective optimisation of a power generation system integrating solid oxide fuel cell and recuperated supercritical carbon dioxide cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    3. Shen, Feifei & Zhao, Liang & Du, Wenli & Zhong, Weimin & Qian, Feng, 2020. "Large-scale industrial energy systems optimization under uncertainty: A data-driven robust optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Shayan, E. & Zare, V. & Mirzaee, I., 2019. "On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1126-1138.
    5. Mehr, A.S. & MosayebNezhad, M. & Lanzini, A. & Yari, M. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Santarelli, M., 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of a novel SOFC based CCHP system in a wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 299-309.
    6. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    7. Ekaterina Matus & Mikhail Kerzhentsev & Ilyas Ismagilov & Andrey Nikitin & Sergey Sozinov & Zinfer Ismagilov, 2023. "Hydrogen Production from Biogas: Development of an Efficient Nickel Catalyst by the Exsolution Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Habibollahzade, Ali & Gholamian, Ehsan & Behzadi, Amirmohammad, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization and comparative performance analysis of hybrid biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell/solid oxide electrolyzer cell/gas turbine using different gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 985-1002.
    9. Wang, Jingyi & Hua, Jing & Li, Dangjiang & Pan, Zehua & Xu, Xinhai & Jiao, Zhenjun & Zhong, Zheng, 2024. "Maximizing thermal integration performance in SOFC CHP systems: A top-down approach to configuration-parameter cooptimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    10. Habibollahzade, Ali & Rosen, Marc A., 2021. "Syngas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell functionality improvement through appropriate feedstock selection and multi-criteria optimization using Air/O2-enriched-air gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    11. Muhammad, Hafiz Ali & Naseem, Mujahid & Kim, Jonghwan & Kim, Sundong & Choi, Yoonseok & Lee, Young Duk, 2024. "Solar hydrogen production: Technoeconomic analysis of a concentrated solar-powered high-temperature electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    12. Ruifeng Guo & Dongfang Chen & Yuehua Li & Wenlong Wu & Song Hu & Xiaoming Xu, 2023. "Anode Nitrogen Concentration Estimation Based on Voltage Variation Characteristics for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stacks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Rosen, Marc A., 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis of two solid oxide fuel cell based cogeneration plants integrated with simple or modified supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    14. Ai, Tianchao & Chen, Hongwei & Zhong, Fanghao & Jia, Jiandong & Song, Yangfan, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of a novel CCHP system with organic flash cycle based on different operating strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    15. Wang, Qiushi & Duan, Liqiang & Zheng, Nan & Lu, Ziyi, 2023. "4E Analysis of a novel combined cooling, heating and power system coupled with solar thermochemical process and energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    16. Xu, Yuhao & Luo, Xiaobing & Tu, Zhengkai & Siew Hwa Chan,, 2022. "Multi-criteria assessment of solid oxide fuel cell–combined cooling, heating, and power system model for residential application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    17. Wang, Shucheng & Chen, Xiaoxu & Wei, Bing & Fu, Zhongguang & Li, Hongwei & Qin, Mei, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of a net zero emission system with CCHP and green DME production by integrating biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    18. Mortazavi, Hamed & Beni, Hamidreza Mortazavy & Nadooshan, Afshin Ahmadi & Islam, Mohammad S. & Ghalambaz, Mohammad, 2024. "4E analysis and triple objective NSGA-II optimization of a novel solar-driven combined ejector-enhanced power and two-stage cooling (EORC-TCRC) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    19. Akrami, Ehsan & Ameri, Mohammad & Rocco, Matteo V., 2021. "Conceptual design, exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization for a novel integration of biomass-fueled power plant with MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power productio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    20. Jesús Rey & Francisca Segura & José Manuel Andújar, 2023. "Green Hydrogen: Resources Consumption, Technological Maturity, and Regulatory Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:225:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124003240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.