IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i7p2993-d1106936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrogen Production from Biogas: Development of an Efficient Nickel Catalyst by the Exsolution Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Matus

    (The Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, SB RAS, 650000 Kemerovo, Russia)

  • Mikhail Kerzhentsev

    (The Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, SB RAS, 650000 Kemerovo, Russia)

  • Ilyas Ismagilov

    (The Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, SB RAS, 650000 Kemerovo, Russia)

  • Andrey Nikitin

    (The Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, SB RAS, 650000 Kemerovo, Russia)

  • Sergey Sozinov

    (The Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, SB RAS, 650000 Kemerovo, Russia)

  • Zinfer Ismagilov

    (The Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, SB RAS, 650000 Kemerovo, Russia)

Abstract

Hydrogen production from biogas over alumina-supported Ce 1−x Ni x O 2−x catalysts was studied in a temperature range of 600–850 °C with an initial gas composition of CH 4 /CO 2 /H 2 O of 1/0.8/0.4. To achieve a high and stable hydrogen yield, highly dispersed Ni catalysts were prepared through the exsolution approach. A solid solution of Ce 1−x Ni x O 2−x was firstly formed on the surface of Al 2 O 3 and then activated in H 2 /Ar at 800 °C. The genesis and properties of the Ce 1−x Ni x O 2−x /Al 2 O 3 catalysts were established using X-ray fluorescence analysis, thermal analysis, N 2 adsorption, ex situ and in situ X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, electron microscopy, EDX analysis, and temperature-programmed hydrogen reduction. The performance of Ce 1−x Ni x O 2−x /Al 2 O 3 catalysts in biogas conversion was tuned by regulation of the dispersion and reducibility of the active component through variation of content (5–20 wt.%) and composition (x = 0.2, 0.5, 0.8) of Ce 1−x Ni x O 2−x as well as the mode of its loading (co-impregnation (CI), citrate sol–gel method (SG)). For the 20 wt.% Ce 1−x Ni x O 2−x /Al 2 O 3 catalyst, the rate of the coke formation decreased by a factor of 10 as x increased from 0.2 to 0.8. The optimal catalyst composition (20 wt.% Ce 0.2 Ni 0.8 O 1.8 /80 wt.% Al 2 O 3 ) and preparation mode (citrate sol–gel method) were determined. At 850 °C, the 20 wt.% Ce 0.2 Ni 0.8 O 1.8 /Al 2 O 3 -SG catalyst provides 100% hydrogen yield at full CH 4 conversion and 85% CO 2 utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Matus & Mikhail Kerzhentsev & Ilyas Ismagilov & Andrey Nikitin & Sergey Sozinov & Zinfer Ismagilov, 2023. "Hydrogen Production from Biogas: Development of an Efficient Nickel Catalyst by the Exsolution Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:2993-:d:1106936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/2993/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/2993/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hren, Robert & Vujanović, Annamaria & Van Fan, Yee & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Krajnc, Damjan & Čuček, Lidija, 2023. "Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Ekaterina Matus & Olga Sukhova & Ilyas Ismagilov & Mikhail Kerzhentsev & Olga Stonkus & Zinfer Ismagilov, 2021. "Hydrogen Production through Autothermal Reforming of Ethanol: Enhancement of Ni Catalyst Performance via Promotion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Rasi, S. & Veijanen, A. & Rintala, J., 2007. "Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1375-1380.
    4. Chen, Xuejing & Jiang, Jianguo & Li, Kaimin & Tian, Sicong & Yan, Feng, 2017. "Energy-efficient biogas reforming process to produce syngas: The enhanced methane conversion by O2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 687-697.
    5. Mohamed Benghanem & Adel Mellit & Hamad Almohamadi & Sofiane Haddad & Nedjwa Chettibi & Abdulaziz M. Alanazi & Drigos Dasalla & Ahmed Alzahrani, 2023. "Hydrogen Production Methods Based on Solar and Wind Energy: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2016. "Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 850-866.
    7. Haifeng Liu & Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah & Yang Zhao & Xingyu Sun & Linxun Xu & Xueli Jiang & Shuaishuai Wang, 2022. "A Perspective on the Overarching Role of Hydrogen, Ammonia, and Methanol Carbon-Neutral Fuels towards Net Zero Emission in the Next Three Decades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mulu, Elshaday & M'Arimi, Milton M. & Ramkat, Rose C., 2021. "A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    3. Ratikorn Sornumpol & Dang Saebea & Amornchai Arpornwichanop & Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, 2023. "Process Optimization and CO 2 Emission Analysis of Coal/Biomass Gasification Integrated with a Chemical Looping Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Scholz, Marco & Melin, Thomas & Wessling, Matthias, 2013. "Transforming biogas into biomethane using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 199-212.
    5. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Zuzana Kapsdorferová & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko & Lisa Holden, 2024. "Perspectives of Electricity Production from Biogas in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Lucey, Brian & Yahya, Muhammad & Khoja, Layla & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Ahmed, Ali, 2024. "Interconnectedness and risk profile of hydrogen against major asset classes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Krzysztof Gaska & Agnieszka Generowicz & Anna Gronba-Chyła & Józef Ciuła & Iwona Wiewiórska & Paweł Kwaśnicki & Marcin Mala & Krzysztof Chyła, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence Methods for Analysis and Optimization of CHP Cogeneration Units Based on Landfill Biogas as a Progress in Improving Energy Efficiency and Limiting Climate Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & Parkinson, Brett & Hellgardt, Klaus & Shah, Nilay & Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Uncovering the true cost of hydrogen production routes using life cycle monetisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    9. Yoon, Kwangsuk & Lee, Sang Soo & Ok, Yong Sik & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Song, Hocheol, 2019. "Enhancement of syngas for H2 production via catalytic pyrolysis of orange peel using CO2 and bauxite residue," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    10. Yankun Sun & Wanzhen Liu & Xinzhong Wang & Haiyan Yang & Jun Liu, 2020. "Enhanced Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide from Simulated Biogas on PEI/MEA-Functionalized Silica," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    11. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska & Rafał Matuła & Radosław Tarkowski, 2022. "Prospects for the Implementation of Underground Hydrogen Storage in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Felix T. Haase & Arno Bergmann & Travis E. Jones & Janis Timoshenko & Antonia Herzog & Hyo Sang Jeon & Clara Rettenmaier & Beatriz Roldan Cuenya, 2022. "Size effects and active state formation of cobalt oxide nanoparticles during the oxygen evolution reaction," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 765-773, August.
    13. Mostafa Ahmed & Mohamed Abdelrahem & Ibrahim Harbi & Ralph Kennel, 2020. "An Adaptive Model-Based MPPT Technique with Drift-Avoidance for Grid-Connected PV Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Hatem Abushammala & Muhammad Adil Masood & Salma Taqi Ghulam & Jia Mao, 2023. "On the Conversion of Paper Waste and Rejects into High-Value Materials and Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Bharathiraja, B. & Chakravarthy, M. & Ranjith Kumar, R. & Yogendran, D. & Yuvaraj, D. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Praveen Kumar, R. & Palani, S., 2015. "Aquatic biomass (algae) as a future feed stock for bio-refineries: A review on cultivation, processing and products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 634-653.
    16. Guoqiang Wang & Feng Wang & Delun Guan, 2022. "A Study of Thermoelectric Generation Coupled with Methanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-11, November.
    17. Mulka, Rafał & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Szlachta, Józef & Mulka, Mariusz, 2016. "Estimation of methane production for batch technology – A new approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 440-449.
    18. Qolipour, Mojtaba & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Tousi, Omid Mohseni, 2017. "Techno-economic feasibility of a photovoltaic-wind power plant construction for electric and hydrogen production: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 113-123.
    19. Vladislav Sadykov, 2023. "Advances in Hydrogen and Syngas Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-4, March.
    20. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:2993-:d:1106936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.