IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v150y2018icp299-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic assessment of a novel SOFC based CCHP system in a wastewater treatment plant

Author

Listed:
  • Mehr, A.S.
  • MosayebNezhad, M.
  • Lanzini, A.
  • Yari, M.
  • Mahmoudi, S.M.S.
  • Santarelli, M.

Abstract

Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) have a significant role in both processing wastewaters to return to the water cycle and in transforming between 40% and 60% of the dissolved organic matter into a non-fossil combustible gas (biogas) with a methane content of around 50–70 vol %. Significant energy cost savings can be achieved using combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) systems in small-scale distributed power system wastewater treatment plants. In this study, feasibility of a trigeneration system in a real wastewater treatment plant is studied. A mathematical model has been developed to evaluate system performance from the thermodynamics point of view. Based on the simulation results, fuel consumption, power production, and thermal efficiency of the system were analyzed. For the proposed configuration, the electricity coverage is increased by 27% and the produced cooling load of around 20 kW in summer season is obtained. The results also reveal that integration of the trilateral cycle (TLC) and the absorption chiller system in the reference WWTP offers a 17.2% more efficient plant from the viewpoint of first law efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehr, A.S. & MosayebNezhad, M. & Lanzini, A. & Yari, M. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Santarelli, M., 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of a novel SOFC based CCHP system in a wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 299-309.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:150:y:2018:i:c:p:299-309
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421830330X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadeghi, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zar, M. & Santarelli, M., 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of a novel syngas fed SOFC power plant using a downdraft gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 16-31.
    2. Lai, Ngoc Anh & Fischer, Johann, 2012. "Efficiencies of power flash cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1017-1027.
    3. Guan, Tingting & Alvfors, Per & Lindbergh, Göran, 2014. "Investigation of the prospect of energy self-sufficiency and technical performance of an integrated PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell), dairy farm and biogas plant system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 685-691.
    4. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S., 2013. "Simulation study of the combination of absorption refrigeration and ejector-expansion systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 370-381.
    5. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    6. Yari, Mortaza & Mehr, Ali Saberi & Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed & Santarelli, Massimo, 2016. "A comparative study of two SOFC based cogeneration systems fed by municipal solid waste by means of either the gasifier or digester," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 586-602.
    7. Fischer, Johann, 2011. "Comparison of trilateral cycles and organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6208-6219.
    8. Mehr, A.S. & Gandiglio, M. & MosayebNezhad, M. & Lanzini, A. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Santarelli, M., 2017. "Solar-assisted integrated biogas solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) installation in wastewater treatment plant: Energy and economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 620-638.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yuqing & Wehrle, Lukas & Banerjee, Aayan & Shi, Yixiang & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2021. "Analysis of a biogas-fed SOFC CHP system based on multi-scale hierarchical modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 78-87.
    2. Elio, Joseph & Milcarek, Ryan J., 2022. "Techno-economic analysis and case study of combined heat and power systems in a wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Mei, Shuxue & Lu, Xiaorui & Zhu, Yu & Wang, Shixue, 2021. "Thermodynamic assessment of a system configuration strategy for a cogeneration system combining SOFC, thermoelectric generator, and absorption heat pump," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    4. MosayebNezhad, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Lanzini, A. & Misul, D. & Santarelli, M., 2019. "Technology review and thermodynamic performance study of a biogas-fed micro humid air turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 407-418.
    5. Ziyang Guo & Yongjun Sun & Shu-Yuan Pan & Pen-Chi Chiang, 2019. "Integration of Green Energy and Advanced Energy-Efficient Technologies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-29, April.
    6. Kirilova, Elisaveta G. & Vladova, Rayka K. & Vaklieva-Bancheva, Natasha Gr, 2020. "Heat integration of two-stage autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion system for reducing the impact of uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Piadehrouhi, Forough & Ghorbani, Bahram & Miansari, Mehdi & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Development of a new integrated structure for simultaneous generation of power and liquid carbon dioxide using solar dish collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 938-959.
    8. Salameh, Tareq & Tawalbeh, Muhammad & Al-Shannag, Mohammad & Saidan, Motasem & Melhem, Khalid Bani & Alkasrawi, Malek, 2020. "Energy saving in the process of bioethanol production from renewable paper mill sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. J. Villarroel-Schneider & Anders Malmquist & Joseph A. Araoz & J. Martí-Herrero & Andrew Martin, 2019. "Performance Analysis of a Small-Scale Biogas-Based Trigeneration Plant: An Absorption Refrigeration System Integrated to an Externally Fired Microturbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    10. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & Zhang, Xiaosong & Chen, Yi & Wang, Zefeng & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Assessment of a combined cooling, heating and power system by synthetic use of biogas and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 922-935.
    11. Mehr, A.S. & Lanzini, A. & Santarelli, M. & Rosen, Marc A., 2021. "Polygeneration systems based on high temperature fuel cell (MCFC and SOFC) technology: System design, fuel types, modeling and analysis approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Park, Heejin & Jung, Yoonju & Park, Chungi & Lee, Jaeseung & Ghasemi, Masoomeh & Alam, Afroz & Kim, Hyeonjin & Kim, Jinwook & Park, Sojin & Choi, Kyungshik & You, Hyunseok & Ju, Hyunchul, 2023. "Performance evaluation and economic feasibility of a PAFC-based multi-energy hub system in South Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Rosen, Marc A., 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis of two solid oxide fuel cell based cogeneration plants integrated with simple or modified supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Löffler, Michael, 2017. "Batch Processes in Heat Engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 788-794.
    3. Malfuzi, A. & Mehr, A.S. & Rosen, Marc A. & Alharthi, M. & Kurilova, A.A., 2020. "Economic viability of bitcoin mining using a renewable-based SOFC power system to supply the electrical power demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    5. Shayan, E. & Zare, V. & Mirzaee, I., 2019. "On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1126-1138.
    6. Woodland, Brandon J. & Ziviani, Davide & Braun, James E. & Groll, Eckhard A., 2020. "Considerations on alternative organic Rankine Cycle congurations for low-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Guillaume Lhermet & Nicolas Tauveron & Nadia Caney & Quentin Blondel & Franck Morin, 2022. "A Recent Advance on Partial Evaporating Organic Rankine Cycle: Experimental Results on an Axial Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Mehr, A.S. & Moharramian, A. & Hossainpour, S. & Pavlov, Denis A., 2020. "Effect of blending hydrogen to biogas fuel driven from anaerobic digestion of wastewater on the performance of a solid oxide fuel cell system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Gleinser, Moritz & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2018. "Batch evaporation power cycle: Influence of thermal inertia and residence time," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1090-1101.
    10. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    11. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Fierro, José J. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Potential savings in the cement industry using waste heat recovery technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    12. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycle alternatives for the cement industry using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology and energy-economic-environmental (3E) analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    13. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    14. Ajimotokan, H.A. & Sher, I., 2015. "Thermodynamic performance simulation and design optimisation of trilateral-cycle engines for waste heat recovery-to-power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 26-34.
    15. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2023. "Exergy efficiency potential of dual-phase expansion trilateral and partial evaporation ORC with zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    16. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.
    17. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Rijpkema, J. & Munch, K. & Andersson, S.B., 2018. "Thermodynamic potential of twelve working fluids in Rankine and flash cycles for waste heat recovery in heavy duty diesel engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 996-1007.
    19. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    20. Mehr, A.S. & Lanzini, A. & Santarelli, M. & Rosen, Marc A., 2021. "Polygeneration systems based on high temperature fuel cell (MCFC and SOFC) technology: System design, fuel types, modeling and analysis approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:150:y:2018:i:c:p:299-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.