IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v219y2023ip2s0960148123014568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive study on the consequences of substituting energy crops by alternative substrates for biogas production in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Steindl, Matthias
  • Dandikas, Vasilis
  • Lichti, Fabian
  • Höcherl, Susanne
  • Koch, Konrad

Abstract

Using agricultural waste biomass and by-products (alternative substrates) for biogas production is a promising strategy to improve energy self-sufficiency in the European Union, and the sustainability of biogas production. A comprehensive study with three different types of alternative substrates was conducted on lab-scale. The methane potential of the untreated alternative substrates was 44.1–66.5% of maize silage. Promising substrate pre-treatment methods were identified, enhancing the methane potential by up to 46% and the degradation kinetics by up to 106%, respectively. Simulating the methane production in continuously operated digesters by parameters obtained in the batch tests was possible. High accuracy of the parameters was essential to obtain reliable simulation results. Applying the simulation approach to a case study revealed that the methane production is reduced by 36%–73% if the alternative substrates substitute maize silage. To analyze the economic feasibility, this was contrasted with prices for maize silage and electricity in Germany in 2022. Only maize straw showed the potential to replace maize silage during those hours that featured the 25% lowest electricity prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Steindl, Matthias & Dandikas, Vasilis & Lichti, Fabian & Höcherl, Susanne & Koch, Konrad, 2023. "A comprehensive study on the consequences of substituting energy crops by alternative substrates for biogas production in Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:219:y:2023:i:p2:s0960148123014568
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123014568
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lippert, Thomas & Bandelin, Jochen & Xu, Yunqi & Liu, Yu Chen & Robles, Gabriel Hernández & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2020. "From pre-treatment to co-treatment - How successful is ultrasonication of digested sewage sludge in continuously operated anaerobic digesters?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 56-65.
    2. Anu, & Kumar, Anil & Rapoport, Alexander & Kunze, Gotthard & Kumar, Sanjeev & Singh, Davender & Singh, Bijender, 2020. "Multifarious pretreatment strategies for the lignocellulosic substrates for the generation of renewable and sustainable biofuels: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1228-1252.
    3. Dandikas, Vasilis & Heuwinkel, Hauke & Lichti, Fabian & Eckl, Thomas & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Correlation between hydrolysis rate constant and chemical composition of energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-42.
    4. Janke, Leandro & Weinrich, Sören & Leite, Athaydes F. & Sträuber, Heike & Nikolausz, Marcell & Nelles, Michael & Stinner, Walter, 2019. "Pre-treatment of filter cake for anaerobic digestion in sugarcane biorefineries: Assessment of batch versus semi-continuous experiments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1416-1426.
    5. Hamelin, Lorie & Borzęcka, Magdalena & Kozak, Małgorzata & Pudełko, Rafał, 2019. "A spatial approach to bioeconomy: Quantifying the residual biomass potential in the EU-27," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 127-142.
    6. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Peni, Dumitru & Dębowski, Marcin, 2022. "Biogas potential of cup plant and willow-leaf sunflower biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Stürmer, B. & Leiers, D. & Anspach, V. & Brügging, E. & Scharfy, D. & Wissel, T., 2021. "Agricultural biogas production: A regional comparison of technical parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 171-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Zhanglin & Wan, Xue & Wang, Qing & Tian, Dong & Hu, Jinguang & Huang, Mei & Shen, Fei & Zeng, Yongmei, 2021. "Performances of a multi-product strategy for bioethanol, lignin, and ultra-high surface area carbon from lignocellulose by PHP (phosphoric acid plus hydrogen peroxide) pretreatment platform," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Yermek Abilmazhinov & Kapan Shakerkhan & Vladimir Meshechkin & Yerzhan Shayakhmetov & Nurzhan Nurgaliyev & Anuarbek Suychinov, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling for Evaluating the Sustainability of Biogas Generation through Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Jan K. Kazak & Joanna A. Kamińska & Rafał Madej & Marta Bochenkiewicz, 2020. "Where Renewable Energy Sources Funds are Invested? Spatial Analysis of Energy Production Potential and Public Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Yao, Junwei & Xie, Xiaobao & Shi, Qingshan, 2021. "Improving enzymatic saccharification of Chinese silvergrass by FeCl3-catalyzed γ-valerolactone/water pretreatment system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 853-858.
    6. Marquina, Jesús & Colinet, María José & Pablo-Romero, María del P., 2021. "The economic value of olive sector biomass for thermal and electrical uses in Andalusia (Spain)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Iva Ridjan Skov & Noémi Schneider & Gerald Schweiger & Josef-Peter Schöggl & Alfred Posch, 2021. "Power-to-X in Denmark: An Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Andrade Díaz, Christhel & Albers, Ariane & Zamora-Ledezma, Ezequiel & Hamelin, Lorie, 2024. "The interplay between bioeconomy and the maintenance of long-term soil organic carbon stock in agricultural soils: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    9. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    10. Ebrahimian, Farinaz & Karimi, Keikhosro & Angelidaki, Irini, 2022. "Coproduction of hydrogen, butanol, butanediol, ethanol, and biogas from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste using bacterial cocultivation followed by anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 552-560.
    11. Aghili Mehrizi, Amirreza & Tangestaninejad, Shahram & Denayer, Joeri F.M. & Karimi, Keikhosro & Shafiei, Marzieh, 2023. "The critical impacts of anion and cosolvent on morpholinium ionic liquid pretreatment for efficient renewable energy production from triticale straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 686-698.
    12. Wu, Wei & Taipabu, Muhammad Ikhsan & Chang, Wei-Chen & Viswanathan, Karthickeyan & Xie, Yi-Lin & Kuo, Po-Chih, 2022. "Economic dispatch of torrefied biomass polygeneration systems considering power/SNG grid demands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 707-719.
    13. Garcia, Natalia Herrero & Mattioli, Andrea & Gil, Aida & Frison, Nicola & Battista, Federico & Bolzonella, David, 2019. "Evaluation of the methane potential of different agricultural and food processing substrates for improved biogas production in rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Dariusz Kurczyński & Grzegorz Wcisło & Piotr Łagowski, 2021. "Experimental Study of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Gas Composition of a Diesel Engine Powered by Biodiesel from Waste of Animal Origin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Damaceno, Felippe Martins & Chiarelotto, Maico & Pires Salcedo Restrepo, Juan C. & Buligon, Eduardo Luiz & Costa, Luiz Antonio de Mendonça & de Lucas Junior, Jorge & Costa, Mônica Sarolli Silva de Men, 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of sludge cake from poultry slaughtering wastewater treatment and sweet potato: Energy and nutrient recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 489-499.
    16. Ribeiro, Lucília Sousa & Pires, Ana Luzia Ferreira & Órfão, José Joaquim de Melo & Pereira, Manuel Fernando Ribeiro, 2022. "Paving the way towards an eco- and budget-friendly one-pot catalytic conversion of cellulose and lignocellulosic residues into ethylene glycol over Ni–W/CNT catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1008-1022.
    17. Brassard, P. & Godbout, S. & Hamelin, L., 2021. "Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: A case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Montazerinejad, H. & Eicker, U., 2022. "Recent development of heat and power generation using renewable fuels: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    19. Greggio, Nicolas & Balugani, Enrico & Carlini, Carlotta & Contin, Andrea & Labartino, Nicola & Porcelli, Roberto & Quaranta, Marta & Righi, Serena & Vogli, Luciano & Marazza, Diego, 2019. "Theoretical and unused potential for residual biomasses in the Emilia Romagna Region (Italy) through a revised and portable framework for their categorization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 590-606.
    20. Krogh, Andreas & Lozano, Eliana M. & Grue, Jeppe & Pedersen, Thomas H., 2024. "Assessment of feasible site locations for biofuel production based on technoeconomic modelling and GHG impact analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:219:y:2023:i:p2:s0960148123014568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.