IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v215y2023ics0960148123009278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energetic valorization of biogas. A comparison between centralized and decentralized approach

Author

Listed:
  • González, Ruben
  • García-Cascallana, José
  • Gómez, Xiomar

Abstract

In the present manuscript, the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of different digestion configurations were evaluated by considering a double turbocharged engine, Jenbacher type JGS 320 GS-BL. Scenarios considered a single farm producing the biogas needed to run the engine (Scenario 1). The second scenario assumed a centralized system treating manure from the surrounding farms (Scenario 2). The third scenario considered partial decentralization with farms treating locally produced wastes, and biogas being transported and valorized in a centralized engine (Scenario 3). Centralized valorization showed the best results. However, this scheme is inappropriate due to the size of the farm needed to support this configuration. The transport of wastes to a centralized treatment unit showed similar efficiency values but the economic feasibility was adversely affected. The worst performance was found for the decentralized configuration with efficiency in the range of 39–43%, much lower values than those obtained from previous cases (58%) with null economic feasibility due to the high costs associated with the transport of biogas either by truck or through a piping system.

Suggested Citation

  • González, Ruben & García-Cascallana, José & Gómez, Xiomar, 2023. "Energetic valorization of biogas. A comparison between centralized and decentralized approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:215:y:2023:i:c:s0960148123009278
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123009278
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schommer, Vera Analise & Wenzel, Bruno München & Daroit, Daniel Joner, 2020. "Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and chicken feathers: Effects of manure maturation and microbial pretreatment of feathers on methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1284-1291.
    2. Wang, Yuqing & Wehrle, Lukas & Banerjee, Aayan & Shi, Yixiang & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2021. "Analysis of a biogas-fed SOFC CHP system based on multi-scale hierarchical modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 78-87.
    3. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    4. Gabriele Mancini & Stefano Papirio & Piet N. L. Lens & Giovanni Esposito, 2019. "A Preliminary Study of the Effect of Bioavailable Fe and Co on the Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Pokorna, Dana & Varga, Zdenek & Andreides, Dominik & Zabranska, Jana, 2019. "Adaptation of anaerobic culture to bioconversion of carbon dioxide with hydrogen to biomethane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 167-172.
    6. de Castro e Silva, Hellen Luisa & Huamán Córdova, Maxi Estefany & Barros, Regina Mambeli & Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lucio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Moreira Santos, Afonso Henriques & dos Santos, Ivan, 2022. "Lab-scale and economic analysis of biogas production from swine manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 350-365.
    7. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Marco Modica & Andrea Rampa, 2021. "The Biogas dilemma: an analysis on the Social Approval of large new plants," SEEDS Working Papers 0221, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Apr 2021.
    8. Alptekin, Ertan & Canakci, Mustafa, 2008. "Determination of the density and the viscosities of biodiesel–diesel fuel blends," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(12), pages 2623-2630.
    9. Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Qing & Gul, Eid & Shi, Mengmeng & Li, Jiashuo & Yang, Minjiao & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Bin & Zhao, Haibo & Yan, Yunjun & Erdoğan, Güneş & Bartocci, Pietro & Fantozzi, Francesco, 2021. "Decarbonizing university campuses through the production of biogas from food waste: An LCA analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 565-578.
    10. Velásquez Piñas, Jean Agustin & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & del Olmo, Oscar Almazan & Calle Roalcaba, Orly Denisse, 2019. "An economic holistic feasibility assessment of centralized and decentralized biogas plants with mono-digestion and co-digestion systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 40-51.
    11. He, Guizhen & Bluemling, Bettina & Mol, Arthur P.J. & Zhang, Lei & Lu, Yonglong, 2013. "Comparing centralized and decentralized bio-energy systems in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 34-43.
    12. Willeghems, Gwen & Buysse, Jeroen, 2019. "Improving the profitability of anaerobic digestion: is the public support framework compatible with participation in the day-ahead electricity market?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 560-572.
    13. Samer, Mohamed & Abdelaziz, Salwa & Refai, Mohamed & Abdelsalam, Essam, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of dry fermentation in household biogas units through co-digestion of manure and agricultural crop residues in Egypt," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 226-234.
    14. Bluemling, Bettina & Mol, Arthur P.J. & Tu, Qin, 2013. "The social organization of agricultural biogas production and use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 10-17.
    15. Gahyun Baek & Danbee Kim & Jinsu Kim & Hanwoong Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2020. "Treatment of Cattle Manure by Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Food Waste and Pig Manure: Methane Yield and Synergistic Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, July.
    16. de Arespacochaga, N. & Valderrama, C. & Raich-Montiu, J. & Crest, M. & Mehta, S. & Cortina, J.L., 2015. "Understanding the effects of the origin, occurrence, monitoring, control, fate and removal of siloxanes on the energetic valorization of sewage biogas—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 366-381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camila Agner D’Aquino & Bruno Alves Pereira & Tulio Ferreira Sawatani & Samantha Coelho de Moura & Alice Tagima & Júlia Carolina Bevervanso Borba Ferrarese & Samantha Christine Santos & Ildo Luis Saue, 2022. "Biogas Potential from Slums as a Sustainable and Resilient Route for Renewable Energy Diffusion in Urban Areas and Organic Waste Management in Vulnerable Communities in São Paulo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Bluemling, Bettina, 2013. "Synopsis of the Special Issue Section: “The social organization of agricultural biogas production and use”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 52-54.
    3. Calbry-Muzyka, Adelaide & Tarik, Mohamed & Gandiglio, Marta & Li, Jianrong & Foppiano, Debora & de Krom, Iris & Heikens, Dita & Ludwig, Christian & Biollaz, Serge, 2021. "Sampling, on-line and off-line measurement of organic silicon compounds at an industrial biogas-fed 175-kWe SOFC plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 61-71.
    4. Wang, Qingbin & Thompson, Ethan & Tweedy, Angela & O'Leary, Mary L. & Crossman, Williams W., 2021. "Potentials and obstacles for community anaerobic digesters in the United States: Evidence from a case study in Vermont," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Danijel Topić & Marinko Barukčić & Dražen Mandžukić & Cecilia Mezei, 2020. "Optimization Model for Biogas Power Plant Feedstock Mixture Considering Feedstock and Transportation Costs Using a Differential Evolution Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Yongzhong Jiang & Valerii Havrysh & Oleksandr Klymchuk & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Utilization of Crop Residue for Power Generation: The Case of Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Masayasu Asai & Takashi Hayashi & Mitasu Yamamoto, 2019. "Mental Model Analysis of Biogas Energy Perceptions and Policy Reveals Potential Constraints in a Japanese Farm Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Arkadiusz Piwowar, 2020. "Agricultural Biogas—An Important Element in the Circular and Low-Carbon Development in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Bluemling, Bettina & de Visser, Ina, 2013. "Overcoming the “club dilemma” of village-scale bioenergy projects—The case of India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 18-25.
    10. Palma-Heredia, D. & Verdaguer, M. & Molinos-Senante, M. & Poch, M. & Cugueró-Escofet, M.À., 2021. "Optimised blending for anaerobic co-digestion using ant colony approach: Besòs river basin case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 141-150.
    11. Mac Clay, Pablo & Börner, Jan & Sellare, Jorge, 2023. "Institutional and macroeconomic stability mediate the effect of auctions on renewable energy capacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    12. Rahul Kadam & Sangyeol Jo & Jonghwa Lee & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jungyu Park, 2024. "A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    13. Fernandez, Helen Coarita & Buffiere, Pierre & Bayard, Rémy, 2022. "Understanding the role of mechanical pretreatment before anaerobic digestion: Lab-scale investigations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 193-203.
    14. Yang, Jing & Song, Kaihui & Hou, Jian & Zhang, Peidong & Wu, Jinhu, 2017. "Temporal and spacial dynamics of bioenergy-related CO2 emissions and underlying forces analysis in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1323-1330.
    15. Dumitru Peni & Marcin Dębowski & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2022. "Influence of the Fertilization Method on the Silphium perfoliatum Biomass Composition and Methane Fermentation Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Maktabifard, Mojtaba & Al-Hazmi, Hussein E. & Szulc, Paulina & Mousavizadegan, Mohammad & Xu, Xianbao & Zaborowska, Ewa & Li, Xiang & Mąkinia, Jacek, 2023. "Net-zero carbon condition in wastewater treatment plants: A systematic review of mitigation strategies and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Md Muzammel Hossain & Yuan Yuan & Hengliang Huang & Ziwei Wang & Mohammad Abdul Baki & Zhihua Dai & Muhammad Rizwan & Shuanglian Xiong & Menghua Cao & Shuxin Tu, 2021. "Exposure to Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) Affects the Antioxidant Response and Gene Expression of Procambarus clarkii," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    18. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    19. Altsitsiadis, E. & Kaiser, M. & Tsakas, A. & Kyriakidis, A. & Stamos, A., 2024. "Investigating the Regional and Individual Drivers of the Support for Renewable Energy Transition: The Role of Severe Material Deprivation," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2419, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    20. Amit Kumar Jaglan & Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela & Mansi Vinaik & Brajesh Dubey, 2022. "Environmental Impact Evaluation of University Integrated Waste Management System in India Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:215:y:2023:i:c:s0960148123009278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.