IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7004-d295506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilization of Crop Residue for Power Generation: The Case of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Yongzhong Jiang

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, 1 ErXianQiaoDongSan Rd, Chengdu 610059, China
    Department of Economics, University of Kansas, 1460 Jayhawk Blvd., 415 Snow Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA)

  • Valerii Havrysh

    (Department of Tractors and Agricultural Machinery, Operating and Maintenance, Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Mykolayiv 54020, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandr Klymchuk

    (Department of Administrative Management and Alternative Sources of Energy, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia 21000, Ukraine)

  • Vitalii Nitsenko

    (Department of Accounting and Taxation, Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Higher education institution, Private Joint-Stock Company, Kyiv 03039, Ukraine)

  • Tomas Balezentis

    (Division of Farm and Enterprise Economics, Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Vilnius 01113, Lithuania)

  • Dalia Streimikiene

    (Division of Farm and Enterprise Economics, Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Vilnius 01113, Lithuania)

Abstract

Renewable energy is expected to play a significant role in power generation. The European Union, the USA, China, and others, are striving to limit the use of energy crop for energy production and to increase the use of crop residue both on the field and for energy generation processes. Therefore, crop residue may become a major energy source, with Ukraine following this course. Currently in Ukraine, renewable power generation does not exceed 10% of total electricity production. Despite a highly developed agriculture sector, there are only a small number of biomass power plants which burn crop residues. To identify possibilities for renewable power generation, the quantity of crop residues, their energy potential, and potential electricity generation were appraised. Cluster analysis was used to identify regions with the highest electricity consumption and crop residue energy potential. The major crops (wheat, barley, rapeseed, sunflower, and soybean) were considered in this study. A national production of crop residue for energy production of 48.66 million tons was estimated for 2018. The availability of crop residues was analyzed taking into account the harvest, residue-to-crop ratio, and residue removal rate. The crop residue energy potential of Ukraine has been estimated at 774.46 PJ. Power generation technologies have been analyzed. This study clearly shows that crop residue may generate between 27 and 108 billion kWh of power. We have selected preferable regions for setting up crop residue power plants. The results may be useful for the development of energy policy and helpful for investors in considering power generation projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongzhong Jiang & Valerii Havrysh & Oleksandr Klymchuk & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Utilization of Crop Residue for Power Generation: The Case of Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7004-:d:295506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hong, Lixuan & Zhou, Nan & Fridley, David & Raczkowski, Chris, 2013. "Assessment of China's renewable energy contribution during the 12th Five Year Plan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1533-1543.
    2. Weiser, Christian & Zeller, Vanessa & Reinicke, Frank & Wagner, Bernhard & Majer, Stefan & Vetter, Armin & Thraen, Daniela, 2014. "Integrated assessment of sustainable cereal straw potential and different straw-based energy applications in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 749-762.
    3. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    4. Gustavsson, L. & Holmberg, J. & Dornburg, V. & Sathre, R. & Eggers, T. & Mahapatra, K. & Marland, G., 2007. "Using biomass for climate change mitigation and oil use reduction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5671-5691, November.
    5. Monforti, F. & Bódis, K. & Scarlat, N. & Dallemand, J.-F., 2013. "The possible contribution of agricultural crop residues to renewable energy targets in Europe: A spatially explicit study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 666-677.
    6. Sunde, K. & Brekke, A. & Solberg, B., 2011. "Environmental impacts and costs of woody Biomass-to-Liquid (BTL) production and use -- A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 591-602, October.
    7. Mikael Lantz & Thomas Prade & Serina Ahlgren & Lovisa Björnsson, 2018. "Biogas and Ethanol from Wheat Grain or Straw: Is There a Trade-Off between Climate Impact, Avoidance of iLUC and Production Cost?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Perkins, Greg & Bhaskar, Thallada & Konarova, Muxina, 2018. "Process development status of fast pyrolysis technologies for the manufacture of renewable transport fuels from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 292-315.
    9. Zhengfeng Zhang & Wei Zhao & Wenwu Zhao, 2014. "Commercialization Development of Crop Straw Gasification Technologies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Bohdan Fedorchenko, 2014. "Cluster Analysis of Bioenergetic Potential in Regions of Ukraine," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 173-178, June.
    11. Yanran Fu & Tao Luo & Zili Mei & Jiang Li & Kun Qiu & Yihong Ge, 2018. "Dry Anaerobic Digestion Technologies for Agricultural Straw and Acceptability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    12. He, Guizhen & Bluemling, Bettina & Mol, Arthur P.J. & Zhang, Lei & Lu, Yonglong, 2013. "Comparing centralized and decentralized bio-energy systems in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 34-43.
    13. Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2018. "Sustainable Energy Based on Sunflower Seed Husk Boiler for Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    15. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2017. "Biogas Engine Waste Heat Recovery Using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Peter Bindzár, 2020. "Studying the Level of Sustainable Energy Development of the European Union Countries and Their Similarity Based on the Economic and Demographic Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Marco Pastori & Angel Udias & Luigi Cattaneo & Magda Moner-Girona & Awa Niang & Cesar Carmona-Moreno, 2021. "Bioenergy Potential of Crop Residues in the Senegal River Basin: A Cropland–Energy–Water-Environment Nexus Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Elem Patricia Rocha Alves & Orlando Salcedo-Puerto & Jesús Nuncira & Samuel Emebu & Clara Mendoza-Martinez, 2023. "Renewable Energy Potential and CO 2 Performance of Main Biomasses Used in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-59, May.
    4. Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska & Tomasz Pisula & Mirosław Liana & László Vasa, 2020. "Taxonomic Analysis of the Diversity in the Level of Wind Energy Development in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Patience Afi Seglah & Yajing Wang & Hongyan Wang & Chunyu Gao & Yuyun Bi, 2022. "Sustainable Biofuel Production from Animal Manure and Crop Residues in Ghana," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Mohsen Jamali & Esmaeil Bakhshandeh & Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi & Carmine Crecchio, 2021. "Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Hongpeng Guo & Shuang Xu & Xiaotong Wang & Wen Shu & Jia Chen & Chulin Pan & Cheng Guo, 2021. "Driving Mechanism of Farmers’ Utilization Behaviors of Straw Resources—An Empirical Study in Jilin Province, the Main Grain Producing Region in the Northeast Part of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Sergii Kyryzyuk & Vitaliy Krupin & Olena Borodina & Adam Wąs, 2020. "Crop Residue Removal: Assessment of Future Bioenergy Generation Potential and Agro-Environmental Limitations Based on a Case Study of Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Oleg Bazaluk & Valerii Havrysh & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Elena A. Tarkhanova, 2020. "Assessment of Green Methanol Production Potential and Related Economic and Environmental Benefits: The Case of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Siniša Škrbić & Aleksandar Ašonja & Radivoj Prodanović & Vladica Ristić & Goran Stevanović & Miroslav Vulić & Zoran Janković & Adriana Radosavac & Saša Igić, 2020. "Analysis of Plant-Production-Obtained Biomass in Function of Sustainable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Alina Zh. Sakun & Kateryna A. Pylypenko & Svitlana V. Skrypnyk & Oleksandr S. Prystemskyi & Inesa V. Shepel, 2022. "Accounting and analytical space of providing the depreciation policy of Ukrainian enterprises," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 247-270.
    12. Sammar Z Allam, 2022. "De-carbonized energy initiative with bio-cell-distributed stations using GIS geodesic tools towards circular economy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(3), pages 562-581, May.
    13. Suzan Abdelhady & Mohamed A. Shalaby & Ahmed Shaban, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis for the Optimal Design of a National Network of Agro-Energy Biomass Power Plants in Egypt," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Lalisa Duguma & Esther Kamwilu & Peter A Minang & Judith Nzyoka & Kennedy Muthee, 2020. "Ecosystem-Based Approaches to Bioenergy and the Need for Regenerative Supply Options for Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Oleg Bazaluk & Valerii Havrysh & Mykhailo Fedorchuk & Vitalii Nitsenko, 2021. "Energy Assessment of Sorghum Cultivation in Southern Ukraine," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Ainagul T. Mamyralieva & Aziza B. Karbekova & Gulchehra B. Abdyrahmanova, 2022. "Analysis of the economic sectors? sustainability of the Kyrgyz Republic," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 185-204.
    17. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Anca-Couce, A. & Hochenauer, C. & Scharler, R., 2021. "Bioenergy technologies, uses, market and future trends with Austria as a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Magdalena Santos-Rodriguez, M. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A stochastic optimization approach for the design of organic fluid mixtures for low-temperature heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 145-159.
    5. Piotr Gradziuk & Barbara Gradziuk & Anna Trocewicz & Błażej Jendrzejewski, 2020. "Potential of Straw for Energy Purposes in Poland—Forecasts Based on Trend and Causal Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    7. Truong, Nguyen Le & Gustavsson, Leif, 2014. "Cost and primary energy efficiency of small-scale district heating systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 419-427.
    8. Valerii Havrysh & Vitalii Nitsenko & Vasyl Hruban, 2022. "Sorghum-Based Power Generation in Southern Ukraine: Energy and Environmental Assessment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Kamila Klimek & Magdalena Kapłan & Serhiy Syrotyuk & Nikolay Bakach & Nikolay Kapustin & Ryszard Konieczny & Jakub Dobrzyński & Kinga Borek & Dorota Anders & Barbara Dybek & Agnieszka Karwacka & Grzeg, 2021. "Investment Model of Agricultural Biogas Plants for Individual Farms in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, November.
    10. Andrea Baccioli & Lorenzo Ferrari & Romain Guiller & Oumayma Yousfi & Francesco Vizza & Umberto Desideri, 2019. "Feasibility Analysis of Bio-Methane Production in a Biogas Plant: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Lei Zheng & Jingang Chen & Mingyue Zhao & Shikun Cheng & Li-Pang Wang & Heinz-Peter Mang & Zifu Li, 2020. "What Could China Give to and Take from Other Countries in Terms of the Development of the Biogas Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Luis Armando Becerra-Pérez & Luis Rincón & John A. Posada-Duque, 2022. "Logistics and Costs of Agricultural Residues for Cellulosic Ethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Hamelin, Lorie & Møller, Henrik Bjarne & Jørgensen, Uffe, 2021. "Harnessing the full potential of biomethane towards tomorrow's bioeconomy: A national case study coupling sustainable agricultural intensification, emerging biogas technologies and energy system analy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Algieri, Angelo & Andiloro, Serafina & Tamburino, Vincenzo & Zema, Demetrio Antonio, 2019. "The potential of agricultural residues for energy production in Calabria (Southern Italy)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Guzović, Zvonimir & Kastrapeli, Simun & Budanko, Marina & Klun, Mario & Rašković, Predrag, 2024. "Improving the thermodynamic efficiency and turboexpander design in bottoming organic Rankine cycles: The impact of working fluid selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    16. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    17. Malico, Isabel & Nepomuceno Pereira, Ricardo & Gonçalves, Ana Cristina & Sousa, Adélia M.O., 2019. "Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 960-977.
    18. Baccioli, Andrea & Ferrari, Lorenzo & Vizza, Francesco & Desideri, Umberto, 2019. "Potential energy recovery by integrating an ORC in a biogas plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    19. González, Ruben & García-Cascallana, José & Gómez, Xiomar, 2023. "Energetic valorization of biogas. A comparison between centralized and decentralized approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. Mac Clay, Pablo & Börner, Jan & Sellare, Jorge, 2023. "Institutional and macroeconomic stability mediate the effect of auctions on renewable energy capacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7004-:d:295506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.