IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v179y2021icp584-592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Novel low-cost pre-treatment material for enhancing the methane yield during anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks: Experimental and kinetic study

Author

Listed:
  • Egwu, Uchenna
  • Oko, Eni
  • Ndukwu, Macmanus Chinenye
  • Sallis, Paul

Abstract

Trona, a low-cost and commonly available evaporite mineral was investigated as a novel pre-treatment material for enhancing the methane yield during the anaerobic digestion (AD) of grass silages. The results from BMP tests indicated that reactors fed with hot water pretreated Guinea grass and reactors fed with the grass pretreated with 5 mg/L and 10 mg/L Trona achieved maximum methane production rates (Umax) of 28.0, 56.4 and 58 N mL CH4/d, respectively, signifying an increase in Umax from Trona-pretreated grass by 201% and 207%, compared to the control reactors. The degradation yields in the three pairs of reactors were 68%, 79% and 75%, respectively. Kinetic modelling showed that the substrate hydrolysis rates (kh-values) were 0.32, 0.35 and 0.34 d−1, respectively, indicating that Trona-pretreatment enhanced the hydrolysis of Guinea grass. A step-change in temperature significantly affected methane yield. Kinetic models also satisfactorily predicted methane productivity in the reactors with >92% prediction accuracy. These results demonstrate that Trona pretreatment and mesophilic temperatures provided accelerated hydrolysis of biomass contents which enhanced methane production.

Suggested Citation

  • Egwu, Uchenna & Oko, Eni & Ndukwu, Macmanus Chinenye & Sallis, Paul, 2021. "Novel low-cost pre-treatment material for enhancing the methane yield during anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks: Experimental and kinetic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 584-592.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:179:y:2021:i:c:p:584-592
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148121010697
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. do Carmo Precci Lopes, Alice & Mudadu Silva, Cláudio & Pereira Rosa, André & de Ávila Rodrigues, Fábio, 2018. "Biogas production from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of kraft pulp mill sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 40-49.
    2. Elagroudy, S. & Radwan, A.G. & Banadda, N. & Mostafa, Nagwan G. & Owusu, P.A. & Janajreh, I., 2020. "Mathematical models comparison of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of microwave pretreated mixed sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1009-1020.
    3. Akbi, Amine & Saber, Meryem & Aziza, Majda & Yassaa, Noureddine, 2017. "An overview of sustainable bioenergy potential in Algeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 240-245.
    4. FitzGerald, Jamie A. & Wall, David M. & Jackson, Stephen A. & Murphy, Jerry D. & Dobson, Alan D.W., 2019. "Trace element supplementation is associated with increases in fermenting bacteria in biogas mono-digestion of grass silage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 980-986.
    5. Wei-Hsin Chen & Keat Teong Lee & Hwai Chyuan Ong, 2019. "Biofuel and Bioenergy Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Abbasi, Tasneem & Tauseef, S.M. & Abbasi, S.A., 2012. "Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation—An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3228-3242.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michele Ponzelli & Hiep Nguyen & Jörg E. Drewes & Konrad Koch, 2023. "Improved Recovery of Overloaded Anaerobic Batch Reactors by Graphene Oxide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Egwu, Uchenna & Onyelowe, Kennedy & Tabraiz, Shamas & Johnson, Emmanuel & Mutshow, Alexander D., 2022. "Investigation of the effect of equal and unequal feeding time intervals on process stability and methane yield during anaerobic digestion grass silage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arshad, Muhammad & Bano, Ijaz & Khan, Nasrullah & Shahzad, Mirza Imran & Younus, Muhammad & Abbas, Mazhar & Iqbal, Munawar, 2018. "Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1241-1246.
    2. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    3. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Mohammed Bouznit & María del P. Pablo-Romero & Antonio Sánchez-Braza, 2020. "Measures to Promote Renewable Energy for Electricity Generation in Algeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:75 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. José Rodríguez-Fernández & Juan José Hernández & Alejandro Calle-Asensio & Ángel Ramos & Javier Barba, 2019. "Selection of Blends of Diesel Fuel and Advanced Biofuels Based on Their Physical and Thermochemical Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Coultry, James & Walsh, Eilín & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Energy and economic implications of anaerobic digestion pasteurisation regulations in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 125-128.
    8. Kamel, Salah & El-Sattar, Hoda Abd & Vera, David & Jurado, Francisco, 2018. "Bioenergy potential from agriculture residues for energy generation in Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 28-37.
    9. Alessandro Casasso & Marta Puleo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2021. "Economic Viability and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Budget of the Biomethane Retrofit of Manure-Operated Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Piedmont, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul & Aghili, Nasim, 2013. "The scenario of greenhouse gases reduction in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 400-409.
    11. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Mehta, Neha & Anderson, Aine & Johnston, Christopher R. & Rooney, David W., 2022. "Evaluating the opportunity for utilising anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis of livestock manure and grass silage to decarbonise gas infrastructure: A Northern Ireland case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 343-357.
    13. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Iglińska, Anna & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz & Kujawski, Wojciech, 2012. "Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4890-4900.
    14. Tauseef, S.M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2013. "Energy recovery from wastewaters with high-rate anaerobic digesters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 704-741.
    15. Héctor Alfredo López-Aguilar & Bryan Morales-Durán & David Quiroz-Cardoza & Antonino Pérez-Hernández, 2023. "Lag Phase in the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sargassum spp. and Organic Domestic Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Mavrotas, George & Gakis, Nikos & Skoulaxinou, Sotiria & Katsouros, Vassilis & Georgopoulou, Elena, 2015. "Municipal solid waste management and energy production: Consideration of external cost through multi-objective optimization and its effect on waste-to-energy solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1205-1222.
    17. Youcef Redjeb & Khatima Kaabeche-Djerafi & Anna Stoppato & Alberto Benato, 2021. "The IRC-PD Tool: A Code to Design Steam and Organic Waste Heat Recovery Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-37, September.
    18. Matheri, Anthony Njuguna & Sethunya, Vuiswa Lucia & Belaid, Mohamed & Muzenda, Edison, 2018. "Analysis of the biogas productivity from dry anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2328-2334.
    19. Mosleh Uddin, Md & Wen, Zhiyou & Mba Wright, Mark, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of using corn stover biochar for manure derived renewable natural gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    20. Navodita Bhatnagar & David Ryan & Richard Murphy & Anne-Marie Enright, 2020. "Trace Element Supplementation and Enzyme Addition to Enhance Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Litter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, July.
    21. Ngo Thi Thanh Truc & Tran Sy Nam & Nguyen Vo Chau Ngan & Jan Bentzen, 2017. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Small-scale Biogas Digesters in Developing Countries – Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 1-8, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:179:y:2021:i:c:p:584-592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.