IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v128y2018ipap188-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable hydrogen production by ethylene glycol steam reforming over Al2O3 supported Ni-Pt bimetallic nano-catalysts

Author

Listed:
  • Larimi, Afsanehsadat
  • Khorasheh, Farhad

Abstract

The steam reforming of ethylene glycol, a simple model compound for biomass-derived liquids, is considered to be an environmentally green process for producing renewable hydrogen. Both Pt and Ni species are known for their catalytic activity under steam reforming reaction conditions. In this investigation, alumina supported Ni-Pt bimetallic catalysts (X wt% Ni-Y wt% Pt/Al2O3 named XNi-YPt) were employed for steam reforming of ethylene glycol. The prepared catalysts were characterized by XRD, BET, H2-TPR, H₂-Chemisorption, and TEM. It was observed that Ni/Pt ratio strongly affected the redox behavior, BET surface area, and particle size of the samples that in turn affected their catalytic performance. The optimum catalyst sample was 3.75Ni-1.25 Pt which resulted in the highest ethylene glycol conversion (60%), highest H2 selectivity (45%) and yield (27%), and a minimum of 20 h of stability due to the lowest amount of coke formed the catalyst surface. The overall order of the catalytic performance of the samples was as follows: 3.75Ni-1.25 Pt > 2.5Ni-2.5 Pt > 1.25Ni-3.75 Pt > 0Ni-5Pt > 5Ni-0Pt. A kinetic model for the steam reforming of ethylene glycol in a packed bed reactor containing the 3.75Ni-1.25 Pt catalyst was employed indicating a good agreement between experimental and predicted H2 selectivity and yield. Intrinsic reaction rate data in the absence of the heat and mass transfer limitations were obtained in parametric studies (Temperature range of 823–893 K, ethylene glycol mole fraction range of 0.056–0.116 and bed density of 18–26 kg m−3). Higher temperature and bed density and lower ethylene glycol mole fraction enhanced the reactivity. The maximum ethylene glycol conversion (70%), H2 yield (36.5%) and H2 selectivity (52%) was observed for conditions of 893 K, bed density of 24 kg m−3 and ethylene glycol mole fraction of 0.056.

Suggested Citation

  • Larimi, Afsanehsadat & Khorasheh, Farhad, 2018. "Renewable hydrogen production by ethylene glycol steam reforming over Al2O3 supported Ni-Pt bimetallic nano-catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 188-199.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:128:y:2018:i:pa:p:188-199
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148118305913
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. D. Cortright & R. R. Davda & J. A. Dumesic, 2002. "Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6901), pages 964-967, August.
    2. Schwengber, Carine Aline & Alves, Helton José & Schaffner, Rodolfo Andrade & da Silva, Fernando Alves & Sequinel, Rodrigo & Bach, Vanessa Rossato & Ferracin, Ricardo José, 2016. "Overview of glycerol reforming for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 259-266.
    3. Bastan, Farzad & Kazemeini, Mohammad & Larimi, Afsaneh Sadat, 2017. "Aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol for production of alkanes over Ni/CexZr1-xO2 nano-catalyst: Effects of the support’s composition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 417-424.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruocco, Concetta & Palma, Vincenzo & Cortese, Marta & Martino, Marco, 2022. "Stability of bimetallic Ni/CeO2–SiO2 catalysts during fuel grade bioethanol reforming in a fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 913-922.
    2. Ramesh, Arumugam & Tamizhdurai, Perumal & Shanthi, Kannan, 2019. "Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of jojoba oil to the green-fuel application on Ni-MoS/Mesoporous zirconia-silica catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 161-173.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bastan, Farzad & Kazemeini, Mohammad & Larimi, Afsaneh Sadat, 2017. "Aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol for production of alkanes over Ni/CexZr1-xO2 nano-catalyst: Effects of the support’s composition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 417-424.
    2. Wang, Zhi & Li, Jian & Yan, Beibei & Zhou, Shengquan & Zhu, Xiaochao & Cheng, Zhanjun & Chen, Guanyi, 2024. "Thermochemical processing of digestate derived from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Yevheniia Ziabina & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2020. "The Green Deal Policy for Renewable Energy: A Bibliometric Analysis," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 3(4), pages 147-168, October.
    4. Jin, Gong & Iwaki, Hiroyuki & Arai, Norio & Kitagawa, Kuniyuki, 2005. "Study on the gasification of wastepaper/carbon dioxide catalyzed by molten carbonate salts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1192-1203.
    5. Feng, Junfeng & Yang, Zhongzhi & Hse, Chung-yun & Su, Qiuli & Wang, Kui & Jiang, Jianchun & Xu, Junming, 2017. "In situ catalytic hydrogenation of model compounds and biomass-derived phenolic compounds for bio-oil upgrading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 140-148.
    6. Meryemoğlu, Bahar & Hasanoğlu, Arif & Kaya, Burçak & Irmak, Sibel & Erbatur, Oktay, 2014. "Hydrogen production from aqueous-phase reforming of sorghum biomass: An application of the response surface methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 535-541.
    7. Saba, N. & Jawaid, M. & Hakeem, K.R. & Paridah, M.T. & Khalina, A. & Alothman, O.Y., 2015. "Potential of bioenergy production from industrial kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) based on Malaysian perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 446-459.
    8. Aubaid Ullah & Nur Awanis Hashim & Mohamad Fairus Rabuni & Mohd Usman Mohd Junaidi, 2023. "A Review on Methanol as a Clean Energy Carrier: Roles of Zeolite in Improving Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.
    9. He, Quan (Sophia) & McNutt, Josiah & Yang, Jie, 2017. "Utilization of the residual glycerol from biodiesel production for renewable energy generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-76.
    10. Moreira, Rui & Bimbela, Fernando & Gandía, Luis M. & Ferreira, Abel & Sánchez, Jose Luis & Portugal, António, 2021. "Oxidative steam reforming of glycerol. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Geun Ho Gu & Miriam Lee & Yousung Jung & Dionisios G. Vlachos, 2022. "Automated exploitation of the big configuration space of large adsorbates on transition metals reveals chemistry feasibility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Ane Caroline Pereira Borges & Jude Azubuike Onwudili & Heloysa Andrade & Carine Alves & Andrew Ingram & Silvio Vieira de Melo & Ednildo Torres, 2020. "Catalytic Properties and Recycling of NiFe 2 O 4 Catalyst for Hydrogen Production by Supercritical Water Gasification of Eucalyptus Wood Chips," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Wang, Jian & Wang, Yincheng & Dong, Xiaoshan & Hu, Yongjie & Tao, Junyu & Kumar, Akash & Yan, Beibei & Chen, Yuxuan & Su, Hong & Chen, Guanyi, 2024. "Insights into behaviors of functional groups in biomass derived products during aqueous phase reforming over Ni/α-MoO3 catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Yi Zhang & Mingting Kou & Kaihua Chen & Jiancheng Guan & Yuchen Li, 2016. "Modelling the Basic Research Competitiveness Index (BR-CI) with an application to the biomass energy field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1221-1241, September.
    15. He, Chao & Chen, Chia-Lung & Giannis, Apostolos & Yang, Yanhui & Wang, Jing-Yuan, 2014. "Hydrothermal gasification of sewage sludge and model compounds for renewable hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1127-1142.
    16. Su, Hongcai & Yan, Mi & Wang, Shurong, 2022. "Recent advances in supercritical water gasification of biowaste catalyzed by transition metal-based catalysts for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Zoppi, Giulia & Tito, Edoardo & Bianco, Isabella & Pipitone, Giuseppe & Pirone, Raffaele & Bensaid, Samir, 2023. "Life cycle assessment of the biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass in a hydrothermal liquefaction – aqueous phase reforming integrated biorefinery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 375-385.
    18. Ayoub, Muhammad & Abdullah, Ahmad Zuhairi, 2012. "Critical review on the current scenario and significance of crude glycerol resulting from biodiesel industry towards more sustainable renewable energy industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2671-2686.
    19. Guo, Y. & Wang, S.Z. & Xu, D.H. & Gong, Y.M. & Ma, H.H. & Tang, X.Y., 2010. "Review of catalytic supercritical water gasification for hydrogen production from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 334-343, January.
    20. Khatun, Rahima & Reza, Mohammad Imam Hasan & Moniruzzaman, M. & Yaakob, Zahira, 2017. "Sustainable oil palm industry: The possibilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 608-619.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:128:y:2018:i:pa:p:188-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.