IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v127y2018icp1087-1100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sedimentary basin geothermal favourability mapping and power generation assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Palmer-Wilson, K.
  • Banks, J.
  • Walsh, W.
  • Robertson, B.

Abstract

Globally, sedimentary basin geothermal energy could prove a significant source of low-carbon electricity, but regional resource assessments require collecting high cost sub-surface data. This study applies freely available petroleum production data in a comprehensive approach to: 1) identify favourable locations for geothermal energy development and 2) to estimate electric power generation potential at those locations. A geothermal favourability map identifies favourable locations by overlaying geological and economic criteria. Power generation estimates are based on the Volume Method, which derives power capacity from the thermal energy present in a reservoir. As a method case study, the northeastern British Columbia section of the Western Canada Sedimentary basin is analyzed. Here, four favourable areas are identified (Horn River, Clarke Lake, Prophet River and Jedney) and have a total power capacity of 107.3 MW (distribution mode). Values normalized by reservoir volume range from 1.8 to 4.1 MW/km3. Geothermal brine flow rates required to produce 1 MW of electric power range from 27.5 to 60.4 kg/s. Reservoir size is derived from stratigraphic cross sections and natural gas pool outlines. Uncertainty in reservoir parameters are modeled using Monte Carlo simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Palmer-Wilson, K. & Banks, J. & Walsh, W. & Robertson, B., 2018. "Sedimentary basin geothermal favourability mapping and power generation assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1087-1100.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:127:y:2018:i:c:p:1087-1100
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148118305032
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Weides & Jacek Majorowicz, 2014. "Implications of Spatial Variability in Heat Flow for Geothermal Resource Evaluation in Large Foreland Basins: The Case of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    3. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    4. Majorowicz, Jacek & Moore, Michal, 2014. "The feasibility and potential of geothermal heat in the deep Alberta foreland basin-Canada for CO2 savings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 541-549.
    5. Trumpy, E. & Botteghi, S. & Caiozzi, F. & Donato, A. & Gola, G. & Montanari, D. & Pluymaekers, M.P.D. & Santilano, A. & van Wees, J.D. & Manzella, A., 2016. "Geothermal potential assessment for a low carbon strategy: A new systematic approach applied in southern Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 167-181.
    6. Barbier, Enrico, 2002. "Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 6(1-2), pages 3-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Menberg, Kathrin & Heberle, Florian & Bott, Christoph & Brüggemann, Dieter & Bayer, Peter, 2021. "Environmental performance of a geothermal power plant using a hydrothermal resource in the Southern German Molasse Basin," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 20-31.
    2. Schiffner, Daniel & Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Lefsrud, Lianne & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment for heating cattle feed water with low-temperature geothermal energy: A case study from central Alberta, Canada," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1105-1120.
    3. Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Nadkarni, Kabir & Renaud, Evan, 2020. "Estimating parasitic loads related to brine production from a hot sedimentary aquifer geothermal project: A case study from the Clarke Lake gas field, British Columbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 539-552.
    4. Jacek Majorowicz & Stephen E. Grasby, 2021. "Deep Geothermal Heating Potential for the Communities of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-37, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Carlo Roselli & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Energy, Environmental, and Economic Analyses of Geothermal Polygeneration System Using Dynamic Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-34, September.
    2. Moloney, Francesca & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Goswami, D.Y., 2020. "Working fluid parametric analysis for recuperative supercritical organic Rankine cycles for medium geothermal reservoir temperatures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2874-2881.
    3. Ayub, Mohammad & Mitsos, Alexander & Ghasemi, Hadi, 2015. "Thermo-economic analysis of a hybrid solar-binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 326-335.
    4. Zhang, Jianan & Qin, Kan & Li, Daijin & Luo, Kai & Dang, Jianjun, 2020. "Potential of Organic Rankine Cycles for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Nadkarni, Kabir & Renaud, Evan, 2020. "Estimating parasitic loads related to brine production from a hot sedimentary aquifer geothermal project: A case study from the Clarke Lake gas field, British Columbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 539-552.
    7. Tomislav Malvić & Uroš Barudžija & Borivoje Pašić & Josip Ivšinović, 2021. "Small Unconventional Hydrocarbon Gas Reservoirs as Challenging Energy Sources, Case Study from Northern Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Fabien Marty & Sylvain Serra & Sabine Sochard & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    10. Liya Ren & Jianyu Liu & Huaixin Wang, 2020. "Thermodynamic Optimization of a Waste Heat Power System under Economic Constraint," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Maria Alessandra Ancona & Michele Bianchi & Lisa Branchini & Andrea De Pascale & Francesco Melino & Antonio Peretto & Noemi Torricelli, 2021. "Systematic Comparison of ORC and s-CO 2 Combined Heat and Power Plants for Energy Harvesting in Industrial Gas Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    13. Amini, Ali & Mirkhani, Nima & Pakjesm Pourfard, Pedram & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Khodkar, Mohammad Amin, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by a CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 74-84.
    14. Li, Chengyu & Wang, Huaixin, 2016. "Power cycles for waste heat recovery from medium to high temperature flue gas sources – from a view of thermodynamic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 707-721.
    15. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    16. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D’haeseleer, William, 2019. "Design and off-design optimization procedure for low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 716-731.
    17. Astolfi, Marco & Alfani, Dario & Lasala, Silvia & Macchi, Ennio, 2018. "Comparison between ORC and CO2 power systems for the exploitation of low-medium temperature heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1250-1261.
    18. Vonsée, Bram & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Liu, Wen, 2019. "Energy technology dependence - A value chain analysis of geothermal power in the EU," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 419-435.
    19. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    20. Sanne Lemmens, 2016. "Cost Engineering Techniques and Their Applicability for Cost Estimation of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:127:y:2018:i:c:p:1087-1100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.