IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v254y2025ipas0951832024006835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employing the cluster of node cut sets to improve the robustness of the network measured by connectivity

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Wei
  • Sun, Guobin
  • Li, Peng
  • Zhang, Qinghui

Abstract

Protection of critical nodes or edges can help defend networks from failures caused by natural disasters or intended attacks. Node protection becomes the only way when edge protection is not possible, where node connectivity is usually used to measure network robustness due to its effectiveness. Although simple, node connectivity-oriented node consolidation optimization is still NP-hard, especially when dealing with large numbers of nodes. To address the problem, by leveraging the mapping between nodes and traversal trees, per-node cluster of node cut sets is used to identify nominee nodes, which are then conditionally consolidated through a extended dual tree-based selection process. Experimental results show that in small graphs with tens of nodes where the optimal algorithm is applicable, an acceleration ratio of more than 105 (at most 106) is observed at the expense of about 6% extra cost. In large graphs with millions of nodes, the proposed algorithm can help promote node connectivity of more than 99.9% of node pairs, which is far better than commonly used heuristics. Its inherent ready-for-paralleling capability paves the way for more speedups.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Wei & Sun, Guobin & Li, Peng & Zhang, Qinghui, 2025. "Employing the cluster of node cut sets to improve the robustness of the network measured by connectivity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:254:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832024006835
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024006835
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:254:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832024006835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.