IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v238y2023ics0951832023003277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic risk analysis of accidents chain and system protection strategy based on complex network and node structure importance

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Jian Rui
  • Zhao, Mengke
  • Yu, Guanghui
  • Zhang, Jiaqing
  • Lu, Shouxiang

Abstract

Due to the increasing complexity and nonlinearity of complex industrial systems, traditional risk analysis methods have become inapplicable. A method of dynamic risk analysis and system protection based on complex networks and node structure importance was established. The effectiveness of this method is demonstrated through case studies, where we compare and analyze six protection strategies. In light of the topology and directivity of the accidents chain network (ACN) in the complex industrial system, a node structure importance evaluation method and an ACN evaluation method were established to measure the protection cost. An optimal protection strategy model with the protection cost constraint was proposed, and a study was carried out on the ACN of UHV converter transformer. The results show that ACN in UHV converter transformer belongs to a scale-free network. The structural importance evaluation method can identify the critical nodes in ACN, and better reflect the structural importance of nodes than the traditional degree indicator. Considering the dual objectives of the complex system, the optimal protection strategy proposed by the optimal protection model achieves better effect than other strategies, no matter how the protection cost factor and the protection cost budget coefficient change.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Jian Rui & Zhao, Mengke & Yu, Guanghui & Zhang, Jiaqing & Lu, Shouxiang, 2023. "Dynamic risk analysis of accidents chain and system protection strategy based on complex network and node structure importance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:238:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023003277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023003277
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Jintao & Chen, Keyi & Duan, Huayu & Li, Chenling, 2024. "A knowledge graph-based hazard prediction approach for preventing railway operational accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Feng, Jian Rui & Zhao, Meng-ke & Lu, Shou-xiang, 2024. "Accident spread and risk propagation mechanism in complex industrial system network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    3. Li, Haibao & Cai, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Shuai & Zhao, Jiangbin & Si, Shubin, 2024. "Time series importance measure-based reliability optimization for cellular manufacturing systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    4. Sun, Qin & Li, Hongxu & Zhong, Yuanfu & Ren, Kezhou & Zhang, Yingchao, 2024. "Deep reinforcement learning-based resilience enhancement strategy of unmanned weapon system-of-systems under inevitable interferences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Zhang, Chenwei & Wang, Ying & Zheng, Tao & Wang, Chen & Zhang, Kaifeng, 2024. "Identifying critical weak points of power-gas integrated energy system based on complex network theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:238:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023003277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.