IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v252y2024ics0951832024005465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness study of hybrid hypergraphs

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hai-Feng
  • Wang, Hao-Ren
  • Xiang, Bing-Bing
  • Wang, Huan

Abstract

Recently, researchers have used the pairwise networks (lower-order) or hypergraphs (higher-order) to separately model different real systems. However, some real systems may simultaneously exist lower-order and higher-order relationships, for example, in scientist collaboration networks, there exist lower-order relationships, representing whether scientists know each other, as well as higher-order relationships, indicating shared research tasks among multiple scientists, such as co-authors of papers. In light of this, a hybrid hypergraph model that considers both lower-order and higher-order relationships is firstly considered in this work. And then, we focus on studying the robustness of hybrid hypergraphs owing to the importance of this issue. Specifically, we first introduce a collaboration efficiency (CE) metric to measure the robustness of hybrid hypergraphs. We further propose a novel edge removal strategy, termed EIHED (Edge-Included Hyperedge Efficiency Discrepancy), to study its impact on the robustness of hybrid hypergraphs. Finally, we further validate the effectiveness of our proposed strategy from both node attacking strategy and edge protection strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hai-Feng & Wang, Hao-Ren & Xiang, Bing-Bing & Wang, Huan, 2024. "Robustness study of hybrid hypergraphs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024005465
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024005465
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024005465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.