IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v190y2019ic16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value of resilience-based solutions on critical infrastructure protection: Comparing with robustness-based solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Ouyang, Min
  • Liu, Chuang
  • Xu, Min

Abstract

Additional consideration of recovery rapidity makes resilience-based solutions on critical infrastructure protection conceptually more advantageous than robustness-based solutions, but existing studies have not uncovered how large their differences could be. By considering a pre-event protection strategy frequently adopted both in practice and in the literature, i.e., protecting or retrofitting a set of weak components under a limited budget, this paper introduces four mathematical models and their solution algorithms for exactly identifying the optimal robustness-based and resilience-based protection strategies for critical infrastructure systems against worst-case malicious attacks and natural hazards, respectively. By comparing with the optimal robustness-based protection strategy, the value of resilience-based solution is then quantified by how much the system resilience can be improved and how much the system loss can be mitigated. Taking the electric power transmission system in Shelby County, USA as an example, results show that the optimal resilience-based solutions improve the worst-case system resilience by at most 1.29% and reduce the worst-case system loss by at most 13.25%, and enhance the seismic resilience by at most 0.16% and mitigate the system loss by at most 5.27% under seismic hazards at a 2% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. Other model parameters and several other systems are also investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Ouyang, Min & Liu, Chuang & Xu, Min, 2019. "Value of resilience-based solutions on critical infrastructure protection: Comparing with robustness-based solutions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:190:y:2019:i:c:16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018304927
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francis, Royce & Bekera, Behailu, 2014. "A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 90-103.
    2. Yuan, Wei & Zhao, Long & Zeng, Bo, 2014. "Optimal power grid protection through a defender–attacker–defender model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 83-89.
    3. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2016. "A review of definitions and measures of system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 47-61.
    4. Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Li, Qing, 2018. "Locating and protecting facilities from intentional attacks using secrecyAuthor-Name: Zhang, Chi," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 51-62.
    5. Chi Zhang & Jose Ramirez-Marquez, 2013. "Protecting critical infrastructures against intentional attacks: a two-stage game with incomplete information," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 244-258.
    6. Faturechi, Reza & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Travel time resilience of roadway networks under disaster," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 47-64.
    7. Nurre, Sarah G. & Cavdaroglu, Burak & Mitchell, John E. & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Wallace, William A., 2012. "Restoring infrastructure systems: An integrated network design and scheduling (INDS) problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 794-806.
    8. Mark Turnquist & Eric Vugrin, 2013. "Design for resilience in infrastructure distribution networks," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 104-120, March.
    9. Zhang, Chi & Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Wang, Jianhui, 2015. "Critical infrastructure protection using secrecy – A discrete simultaneous game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 212-221.
    10. Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel & Rocco, Claudio M., 2013. "Resilience-based network component importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 89-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2021. "Resilience-based Recovery Scheduling of Transportation Network in Mixed Traffic Environment: A Deep-Ensemble-Assisted Active Learning Approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Wei, Wei & Sun, Guobin & Zhang, Qinghui, 2024. "Large-scale robustness-oriented efficient edge addition through traversal tree-based weak edge identification," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Wandelt, Sebastian & Shi, Xing & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2021. "Estimation and improvement of transportation network robustness by exploiting communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Xu, Min & Ouyang, Min & Hong, Liu & Mao, Zijun & Xu, Xiaolin, 2022. "Resilience-driven repair sequencing decision under uncertainty for critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Li, Qing & Li, Mingchu & Tian, Yuan & Gan, Jianyuan, 2023. "A risk-averse tri-level stochastic model for locating and recovering facilities against attacks in an uncertain environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Tang, Junqing & Xu, Lei & Luo, Chunling & Ng, Tsan Sheng Adam, 2021. "Multi-disruption resilience assessment of rail transit systems with optimized commuter flows," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Wang, Ke & Liu, Jinfeng & Tian, Lai & Tan, Xianfeng & Peng, Guansheng & Qin, Tianwen & Wu, Jun, 2022. "Analyzing vulnerability of optical fiber network considering recoverability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Ferrario, E. & Poulos, A. & Castro, S. & de la Llera, J.C. & Lorca, A., 2022. "Predictive capacity of topological measures in evaluating seismic risk and resilience of electric power networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Hadi Alizadeh & Ayyoob Sharifi, 2020. "Assessing Resilience of Urban Critical Infrastructure Networks: A Case Study of Ahvaz, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Wang, Shuliang & Gu, Xifeng & Luan, Shengyang & Zhao, Mingwei, 2021. "Resilience analysis of interdependent critical infrastructure systems considering deep learning and network theory," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    12. Zhang, Wangxin & Han, Qiang & Shang, Wen-Long & Xu, Chengshun, 2024. "Seismic resilience assessment of interdependent urban transportation-electric power system under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco, Claudio M. & Barker, Kash & Moronta, Jose, 2018. "Quantifying the resilience of community structures in networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 466-474.
    2. Li, Yulong & Zhang, Chi & Jia, Chuanzhou & Li, Xiaodong & Zhu, Yimin, 2019. "Joint optimization of workforce scheduling and routing for restoring a disrupted critical infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Márcio das Chagas Moura & Helder Henrique Lima Diniz & Enrique López Droguett & Beatriz Sales da Cunha & Isis Didier Lins & Vicente Ribeiro Simoni, 2017. "Embedding resilience in the design of the electricity supply for industrial clients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-33, November.
    4. Morshedlou, Nazanin & González, Andrés D. & Barker, Kash, 2018. "Work crew routing problem for infrastructure network restoration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 66-89.
    5. Zhang, Xiaoge & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Sankararaman, Shankar & Goebel, Kai, 2018. "Resilience-based network design under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 364-379.
    6. McCarter, Matthew & Barker, Kash & Johansson, Jonas & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2018. "A bi-objective formulation for robust defense strategies in multi-commodity networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 154-161.
    7. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Sachuer Bao & Chi Zhang & Min Ouyang & Lixin Miao, 2019. "An integrated tri-level model for enhancing the resilience of facilities against intentional attacks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 87-117, December.
    9. Umunnakwe, A. & Huang, H. & Oikonomou, K. & Davis, K.R., 2021. "Quantitative analysis of power systems resilience: Standardization, categorizations, and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Laiany Rodrigues Marinho & Márcio das Chagas Moura & Beatriz Sales Cunha & Isis Didier Lins, 2020. "Optimization of Investments in the Resilience of Water Distribution Systems Subject to Interruptions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(3), pages 929-954, February.
    11. Li, Yapeng & Qiao, Shun & Deng, Ye & Wu, Jun, 2019. "Stackelberg game in critical infrastructures from a network science perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 705-714.
    12. MacKenzie, Cameron A. & Hu, Chao, 2019. "Decision making under uncertainty for design of resilient engineered systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Zhang, Chao & Xu, Xin & Dui, Hongyan, 2020. "Resilience Measure of Network Systems by Node and Edge Indicators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    14. Cerqueti, Roy & Ferraro, Giovanna & Iovanella, Antonio, 2019. "Measuring network resilience through connection patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 320-329.
    15. Liu, Xing & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2021. "A Hierarchical Resilience Enhancement Framework for Interdependent Critical Infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Das, Laya & Munikoti, Sai & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam & Srinivasan, Babji, 2020. "Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    17. Ruiying Li & Qiang Dong & Wenting Ma & Rui Kang, 2023. "A test-based methodology for the probabilistic assessment of system resilience under random disturbances," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 671-685, August.
    18. Adel Mottahedi & Farhang Sereshki & Mohammad Ataei & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    19. Mao, Quan & Li, Nan & Peña-Mora, Feniosky, 2019. "Quality function deployment-based framework for improving the resilience of critical infrastructure systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    20. Uday, Payuna & Chandrahasa, Rakshit & Marais, Karen, 2019. "System Importance Measures: Definitions and Application to System-of-Systems Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:190:y:2019:i:c:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.