IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v254y2025ipas095183202400601x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Team-centered IDAC: Modeling and simulation of operating crew in complex systems - Part 2: Simulation aspects and application

Author

Listed:
  • Azarkhil, Mandana
  • Mosleh, Ali
  • Ramos, Marilia

Abstract

Complex systems operations, such as Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), generally require professional operating teams. Factors associated with teamwork, such as inappropriate communication and coordination, are important contributing factors to accidents and unsafe behavior. The impact of crew interactions on team effectiveness and, consequently, on the entire system, has yet to be fully and quantitatively explored in high-risk environments such as NPPs. Since a team is an interactive social system, team-specific issues must be studied and evaluated from a “team perspective†—based on team dynamics and processes. This paper is a part of a two-papers series that presents a simulation-based Team Model for NPP control room operations. Part 1 describes the theoretical fundaments of the model and details its elements. The current paper, Part 2, describes the simulation aspects and a full application of the method to an NPP four-steam generator feedwater system pipe break. It presents how to set up the simulation elements, such as hardware and humans within a team, using MATLAB Simulink. The method is demonstrated through a case study of an NPP four-steam generator feed water system pipe break. The results are discussed and assessed against theoretical and experimental findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Azarkhil, Mandana & Mosleh, Ali & Ramos, Marilia, 2025. "Team-centered IDAC: Modeling and simulation of operating crew in complex systems - Part 2: Simulation aspects and application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:254:y:2025:i:pa:s095183202400601x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202400601X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiju Antony & V. Somasundarum & Craig Fergusson & Pavel Blecharz, 2004. "Applications of Taguchi approach to statistical design of experiments in Czech Republican industries," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 53(5), pages 447-457, July.
    2. Jo, Wooseok & Lee, Seung Jun, 2024. "Human reliability evaluation method covering operator action timing for dynamic probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Chang, Y.H.J. & Mosleh, A., 2007. "Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 2: IDAC performance influencing factors model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(8), pages 1014-1040.
    4. Chang, Y.H.J. & Mosleh, A., 2007. "Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 4: IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(8), pages 1061-1075.
    5. Qiao, Yidan & Zhang, Xian & Wang, Hanyu & Chen, Dengkai, 2024. "Dynamic assessment method for human factor risk of manned deep submergence operation system based on SPAR-H and SD," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2021. "CMS-BN: A cognitive modeling and simulation environment for human performance assessment, part 1 — methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Mary J. Waller & Naina Gupta & Robert C. Giambatista, 2004. "Effects of Adaptive Behaviors and Shared Mental Models on Control Crew Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1534-1544, November.
    8. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2021. "CMS-BN: A cognitive modeling and simulation environment for human performance assessment, part 2 — Application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiao, Yidan & Gao, Xinwei & Ma, Lin & Chen, Dengkai, 2024. "Dynamic human error risk assessment of group decision-making in extreme cooperative scenario," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2021. "CMS-BN: A cognitive modeling and simulation environment for human performance assessment, part 1 — methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Guo, Jianbin & Ma, Shuo & Zeng, Shengkui & Che, Haiyang & Pan, Xing, 2024. "A risk evaluation method for human-machine interaction in emergencies based on multiple mental models-driven situation assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    4. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2021. "CMS-BN: A cognitive modeling and simulation environment for human performance assessment, part 2 — Application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Azarkhil, Mandana & Mosleh, Ali & Ramos, Marilia, 2025. "Team-centered IDAC: Modeling and simulation of operating crew in complex systems – Part 1: Team model and fundamentals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    6. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Jung, Wondea & Park, Jinkyun & Kim, Yochan & Choi, Sun Yeong & Kim, Seunghwan, 2020. "HuREX – A framework of HRA data collection from simulators in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Di Pasquale, Valentina & Miranda, Salvatore & Iannone, Raffaele & Riemma, Stefano, 2015. "A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 17-32.
    9. Groth, Katrina M. & Smith, Reuel & Moradi, Ramin, 2019. "A hybrid algorithm for developing third generation HRA methods using simulator data, causal models, and cognitive science," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Bandeira, Michelle Carvalho Galvão Silva Pinto & Correia, Anderson Ribeiro & Martins, Marcelo Ramos, 2018. "General model analysis of aeronautical accidents involving human and organizational factors," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 137-146.
    11. Lee, Hyun-Chul & Seong, Poong-Hyun, 2009. "A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1796-1805.
    12. Hu, Lunhu & Pan, Xing & Kang, Rui & Chu, Jian & Gao, Yunfeng & Xue, Zhong & Baoyin, Hexi, 2024. "Dynamic risk assessment of Uncertain Random System considering operator's simple emergency-stop action in short time window," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    13. Schroer, Suzanne & Modarres, Mohammad, 2013. "An event classification schema for evaluating site risk in a multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 40-51.
    14. Jo, Wooseok & Lee, Seung Jun, 2024. "Human reliability evaluation method covering operator action timing for dynamic probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Parhizkar, Tarannom & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer & Vinnem, Jan Erik & Mosleh, Ali, 2021. "Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of complex systems, part 2: Application to risk-informed decision making, practice and results," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Zhang, Xiaoge & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Lau, Nathan & Weinger, Matthew B., 2020. "Multi-source information fusion to assess control room operator performance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    17. Hogenboom, Sandra & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Vinnem, Jan Erik, 2021. "Temporal decision-making factors in risk analyses of dynamic positioning operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    18. Park, Jong Woo & Lee, Seung Jun, 2022. "Simulation optimization framework for dynamic probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. Groth, Katrina M. & Mosleh, Ali, 2012. "A data-informed PIF hierarchy for model-based Human Reliability Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-174.
    20. Ekanem, Nsimah J. & Mosleh, Ali & Shen, Song-Hua, 2016. "Phoenix – A model-based Human Reliability Analysis methodology: Qualitative Analysis Procedure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 301-315.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:254:y:2025:i:pa:s095183202400601x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.