IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v252y2024ics0951832024005167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A risk evaluation method for human-machine interaction in emergencies based on multiple mental models-driven situation assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Jianbin
  • Ma, Shuo
  • Zeng, Shengkui
  • Che, Haiyang
  • Pan, Xing

Abstract

In the process of human-machine interaction (HMI) under abnormal situations, situation assessment (SAS) is a critical component as incorrect SAS can feed into inappropriate actions and cause severe accidents. Therefore, it is essential to model SAS for HMI risk evaluation. During emergency situations, SAS is predominantly affected by time pressure. However, current researches focus on deliberative SAS with sufficient time and have limitations in quantifying the time pressure effect on SAS during emergencies. This paper proposes a risk evaluation method for HMI in emergencies by quantitatively modeling the time pressure effect on SAS under the recognition-primed decision (RPD) model framework. Firstly, SAS process is characterized as identifying the first plausible cause of an abnormal phenomenon driven by multiple Bayesian network-based mental models, and a simulation algorithm for SAS process is proposed to evaluate HMI risk. Secondly, two effects of time pressure on SAS activities, i.e., filtration effect on information perception and impair effect on knowledge retrieval, are quantified based on the Saliency-Effort-Expectancy-Value (SEEV) model and the Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) theory. Finally, this method is applied to a Boeing 737-31S accident with high time pressure and results demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Jianbin & Ma, Shuo & Zeng, Shengkui & Che, Haiyang & Pan, Xing, 2024. "A risk evaluation method for human-machine interaction in emergencies based on multiple mental models-driven situation assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024005167
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024005167
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024005167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.