IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v251y2024ics0951832024004782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A case study to address the limitation of accident scenario identifications with respect to diverse manual responses

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Jinkyun
  • Kim, Hyeonmin

Abstract

Probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) is a tool for securing the operational safety of nuclear power plants. One unique benefit of PSA is to identify accident scenarios leading to undesirable consequences. Since these accident scenarios result from highly complicated combinations of automatic and manual responses, a huge number of simulations are generally required with a precise thermal-hydraulic (TH) code. Therefore, current PSA typically reduces the number of TH code runs by focusing on limited numbers of safety-critical components with reasonable engineering assumptions. Nevertheless, it has been pointed out that the current catalog of accident scenarios in PSA may be insufficient to some extent. In order to corroborate this claim, in this work, 14,348,907 simulation conditions were randomly generated after combining 79 manual responses identified from the emergency operating procedure of a steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) event in a reference nuclear power plant. Results show that about 14.7 % of the simulations correspond to an undesirable consequence pertaining to the SGTR. Accordingly, in terms of enhancing the quality of PSA results, the results of this study support that it is inevitable to develop a promising way to reduce the amount of computational resources required by large numbers of TH code runs.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Jinkyun & Kim, Hyeonmin, 2024. "A case study to address the limitation of accident scenario identifications with respect to diverse manual responses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:251:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024004782
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024004782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:251:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024004782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.