IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v250y2024ics0951832024003880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed-collaborative surrogate modeling approach for creep-fatigue reliability assessment of turbine blades considering multi-source uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Hai-Feng
  • Wang, Yu-Hang
  • Li, Yang
  • Zio, Enrico

Abstract

This paper proposes a substructure-based distributed-collaborative surrogate modeling approach for improving the accuracy and efficiency in the estimation of the creep-fatigue reliability of gas turbine blades with the integration of the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), kriging, Distributed Collaborative (DC) strategy and substructure simulation method, called as the substructure-based DCLKM. Further, the creep-fatigue reliability assessment framework is set by combining the proposed substructure-based DCLKM with some theoretical models, which takes into account the uncertainties of structural sizes, applied loads and material properties and the nonlinearity of creep/fatigue damage interaction. Firstly, the total strain range, mean stress, absolute temperature and maximum stress at the critical location are regarded as the first-level output responses, and their required samples are predicted through the fitted surrogate models. Secondly, the creep life and Low-Cycle Fatigue (LCF) life are regarded as the second-level output responses and predicted. Finally, the creep-fatigue damage and reliability assessment are performed for several given applied cycles, respectively. The proposed substructure-based DCLKM is validated on a case study. The results show that the proposed substructure-based DCLKM is feasible with high accuracy and efficiency in the creep-fatigue reliability assessment of turbine blades.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Hai-Feng & Wang, Yu-Hang & Li, Yang & Zio, Enrico, 2024. "Distributed-collaborative surrogate modeling approach for creep-fatigue reliability assessment of turbine blades considering multi-source uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003880
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024003880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.