IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v250y2024ics0951832024003557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding of causality and its mathematical representation in accident modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Wen, He
  • Khan, Faisal
  • AbouRizk, Simaan
  • Fu, Gui

Abstract

Accident models are a critical element of safety science as they provide a profound understanding of accident causality, which helps develop accident prevention and control strategies. The evolving accident situations and complex engineering systems offer significant challenges in understanding causality. This limits the realistic representation of causality in the accident model, impacting its usefulness. This paper presents a framework to demystify the understanding of causality and its mathematical representation in accident modeling. The framework uses the theory of causality, understanding interdependencies, constructing these elements in mathematical representations to formulate a mathematical accident model, and subsequently utilizing advanced probability theory and machine learning for accident analysis. The methodology is demonstrated in the case of the Champlain Tower South collapse. The ultimate objective of this work is that readers can use this framework for any engineering system accident modeling (i.e., construction, road, or process systems). The framework will help develop accident preventive and control strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen, He & Khan, Faisal & AbouRizk, Simaan & Fu, Gui, 2024. "Understanding of causality and its mathematical representation in accident modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003557
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024003557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.